Clostridium difficile infection laboratory findings

	C. difficile Infection Microchapters
Home
Patient Information
Overview
Historical Perspective
Pathophysiology
Causes
Classification
Differentiating Clostridium difficile infectionfrom other Diseases
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Factors
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms
Physical Examination
Laboratory Findings
Abdominal X Ray
Abdominal CT Scan
Other Imaging Findings
Biopsy
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Surgery
Prevention
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy
Future or Investigational Therapies
Case Studies
Case #1
Clostridium difficile infection laboratory findings On the Web
Most recent articles
Most cited articles
Review articles
CME Programs
Powerpoint slides
Images
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Clostridium difficile infection laboratory findings All Images X-rays Echo & Ultrasound CT Images MRI
Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse
NICE Guidance
FDA on Clostridium difficile infection laboratory findings
CDC on Clostridium difficile infection laboratory findings
Clostridium difficile infection laboratory findings in the news
Blogs on Clostridium difficile infection laboratory findings
Directions to Hospitals Treating Clostridium difficile
Risk calculators and risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Yazan Daaboul, M.D.

Overview

Testing is generally not necessarily for patients with formed stools (no diarrhea). The gold standard for diagnosis of C. difficile infection is cell culture cytotoxic assay, but it is rarely used clinically (difficult technique and time consuming). Among patients with diarrhea,C. difficile infection is diagnosed either by enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) for toxins A and/or B in stools or by DNA-based tests (PCR) that detect bacterial toxin genes in stools. Although both ELISA and DNA-based tests may be performed sequentially, only one positive test is sufficient to diagnose C. difficile infection. Both ELISA and DNA-based tests also have a high negative predictive value > 95% among average-risk patients, and generally negative results warrants the search for alternative diagnoses. The advantage of DNA-based tests over ELISA is that it may detect the presence of BI/NAP1/027 strain, which alters the management plan. However, DNA-based tests may also detect clinically irrelevant findings that may delay the diagnosis. Stool culture requires anaerobic culture and may not be available. Although not diagnostic, additional blood testing may be necessary to monitor for possible development of complications or the success/failure of antimicrobial therapy.

Laboratory Findings

Testing is generally not necessarily for patients with formed stools (no diarrhea). Among patients with diarrhea, C. difficile infection is diagnosed either by enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) for toxins A and/or B in stools or by DNA-based tests that detect bacterial toxin genes in stools. Although not diagnostic, additional blood testing may be necessary to monitor for possible development of complications or the success/failure of antimicrobial therapy.

Blood Work-Up

Complete Blood Count With Differential

Leukocytosis with left shift. Leukocytosis > 20,000 cells/mL is suggestive of severe/complicated C. difficile infection.
Leucopenia is occasionally reported. Leukopenia < 2,000 cells/mL is suggestive of severe/complicated C. difficile infection.

Electrolytes

Inflammatory Markers

Inflammatory markers, such as CRP or ESR may be helpful for follow-up of patients with C. difficile infection or a non-specific means to monitor the success of antimicrobial therapy.

Coagulation Profile

Coagulation profile, such as PTT, PT, and INR should be ready because surgery may be required among patients with complicated disease.

Albumin

Hypoalbuminemia

Lactate

Elevated lactate concentration > 2.2 mmol/L may be suggestive of severe/complicated C. difficile infection.

Stool Work-Up

Stool Analysis

Leukocytosis
Blood in stools

Enzyme-Linked Immunoabsorbant Assay (ELISA) for Toxin

Assessment of the A and B toxins by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbant assay (ELISA) for toxin A or B (or both) is generally sensitive and specific:
- Sensitivity 63-99%
- Specificity 93-100%

Negative predictive value > 95% for patients with average risk (generally if ELISA negative, search for alternative diagnoses warranted)
Following successful antimicrobial therapy, patients may remain positive for many weeks/months. No additional treatment recommended.
ELISA and DNA-based tests (below) may be used sequentially, but one positive result is sufficient for diagnosis.

DNA-Based Tests (PCR)

Higher sensitivity and specificity than ELISA
Negative predictive value > 95% for patients with average risk (generally if DNA-based tests negative, search for alternative diagnoses warranted)
Identify microbial toxin genes and toxicogenic strains in unformed stools
Detects presence of BI/NAP1/027 strain
May detect clinically irrelevant findings.
Following successful antimicrobial therapy, patients may remain positive for many weeks/months. No additional treatment recommended.
DNA-based tests and ELISA (above) may be used sequentially, but one positive result is sufficient for diagnosis.

Cell Culture Cytotoxicity Assay

It is the gold standard for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection.
Among patients with positive results, fibroblast cell rounding will be observed when cultured cells are added to prepared stools.
Requires 24-48 hours for results to be positive and is generally not routinely performed.

Stool Culture

Anaerobic culture needed.
Not widely available.

Gallery

Blood agar, cycloserine mannitol plate culture growing colonies of Clostridium difficile for 48 hours. From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). ^[1]
Clostridium difficile colonies after 48hrs growth on a blood agar plate; Magnified 4.8X. From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). ^[1]
Gram-stain micrograph depicts Clostridium difficile after 24hrs of growth in chopped meat medium; Magnified 956X. From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). ^[1]
Clostridium difficile colonies grown on cycloserine mannitol agar after 48 hours. From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). ^[1]
Impression smear photomicrograph of Clostridium difficile bacteria grown on cycloserine mannitol blood agar. From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). ^[1]
Micrograph of the bacterium Clostridium difficile is made from an impression smear of 72hr anaerobe blood agar. From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). ^[1]
Petri dish culture plate had contained Cycloserine Cefoxitin Fructose Agar (CCFA), inoculated with a Clostridium difficile bacterial culture. From Public Health Image Library (PHIL). ^[1]