Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

	WikiDoc Resources for Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
Articles
Most recent articles on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Most cited articles on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Review articles on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Articles on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ
Media
Powerpoint slides on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Images of Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Photos of Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Podcasts & MP3s on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Videos on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
Evidence Based Medicine
Cochrane Collaboration on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Bandolier on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification TRIP on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
Clinical Trials
Ongoing Trials on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification at Clinical Trials.gov Trial results on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Clinical Trials on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification at Google
Guidelines / Policies / Govt
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification NICE Guidance on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification NHS PRODIGY Guidance FDA on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification CDC on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
Books
Books on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
News
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in the news Be alerted to news on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification News trends on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
Commentary
Blogs on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
Definitions
Definitions of Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
Patient Resources / Community
Patient resources on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Discussion groups on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Patient Handouts on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Directions to Hospitals Treating Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Risk calculators and risk factors for Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
Healthcare Provider Resources
Symptoms of Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Causes & Risk Factors for Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Diagnostic studies for Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification Treatment of Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
Continuing Medical Education (CME)
CME Programs on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
International
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification en Espanol Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification en Francais
Business
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in the Marketplace Patents on Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
Experimental / Informatics
List of terms related to Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA)[1] is a variation of the polymerase chain reaction that permits multiple targets to be amplified with only a single primer pair^[1]. Each probe consists of a two oligonucleotides which recognise adjacent target sites on the DNA. One probe oligonuclotide contains the sequence recognised by the forward primer, the other the sequence recognised by the reverse primer. Only when both probe oligonucleotides are hybridised to their respective targets, can they be ligated into a complete probe. The advantage of splitting the probe into two parts is that only the ligated oligonucleotides, but not the unbound probe oligonucleotides, are amplified. If the probes were not split in this way, the primer sequences at either end would cause the probes to be amplified regardless of their hybridisation to the template DNA, and the amplification product would not be dependent on the number of target sites present in the sample DNA. Each complete probe has a unique length, so that its resulting amplicons can be separated and identified by (capillary) electrophoresis. This avoids the resolution limitations of multiplex PCR. Since the forward primer used for probe amplification is fluorescently labelled, each amplicon generates a fluorescent peak which can be detected by a capillary sequencer. Comparing the peak pattern obtained on a given sample with that obtained on various reference samples, the relative quantity of each amplicon can be determined. This ratio is a measure for the ratio in which the target sequence is present in the sample DNA.

Various techniques including DGGE (Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis), DHPLC (Denaturing High Performance Liquid Chromatography), and SSCA (Single Strand Conformation Analysis) effectively identify SNPs and small insertions and deletions. MLPA, however, is one of the only accurate, time-efficient techniques to detect genomic deletions and insertions (one or more entire exons), which are frequent causes of cancers such as hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), breast, and ovarian cancer. MLPA can successfully and easily determine the relative copy number of all exons within a gene simultaneously with high sensitivity.

Relative ploidy

An important use of MLPA is to determine relative ploidy. For example, probes may be designed to target various regions of chromosome 21 of a human cell. The signal strengths of the probes are compared with those obtained from a reference DNA sample known to have two copies of the chromosome. If an extra copy is present in the test sample, the signals are expected to be 1.5 times the intensities of the respective probes from the reference. If only one copy is present the proportion is expected to be 0.5. If the sample has two copies, the relative probe strengths are expected to be equal.

Dosage quotient analysis

Dosage quotient analysis is the usual method of interpreting MLPA data^[2]. If a and b are the signals from two amplicons in the patient sample, and A and B are the corresponding amplicons in the experimental control, then the dosage quotient DQ = (a/b) / (A/B). Although dosage quotients may be calculated for any pair of amplicons, it is usually the case that one of the pair is an internal reference probe.

Applications of MLPA

MLPA has a variety of applications^[3] including detection of mutations and single nucleotide polymorphisms^[4], analysis of DNA methylation^[5], relative mRNA quantification^[6], chromosomal characterisation of cell lines and tissue samples^[7], detection of duplications and deletions in human cancer predisposition genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2, hMLH1 and hMSH2^[8] and aneuploidy determination^[9]. MLPA has potential application in prenatal diagnosis both invasive^[10] and noninvasive^[11].

References

↑ Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G (2002). "Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification". Nucleic Acids Res. 30 (12): e57. doi:10.1093/nar/gnf056. PMID 12060695.
↑ Yau SC, Bobrow M, Mathew CG, Abbs SJ (1996). "Accurate diagnosis of carriers of deletions and duplications in Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy by fluorescent dosage analysis". J. Med. Genet. 33 (7): 550&ndash, 558. PMID 8818939.
↑ List of MLPA related articles
↑ Volikos E, Robinson J, Aittomaki K, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen H, Westerman AM, de Rooji FW, Vogel T, Moeslein G, Launonen V, Tomlinson IP, Silver AR, Aaltonen LA (2006). "LKB1 exonic and whole gene deletions are a common cause of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome". J. Med. Genet. 43 (5): e18. doi:10.1136/jmg.2005.039875. PMID 16648371.
↑ Procter M, Chou LS, Tang W, Jama M, Mao R (2006). "Molecular diagnosis of Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes by methylation-specific melting analysis and methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification". Clin. Chem. 52 (7): 1276&ndash, 1283. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2006.067603. PMID 16690734.
↑ Wehner M, Mangold E, Sengteller M, Friedrichs N, Aretz S, Friedl W, Propping P, Pagenstecher C (2005). "Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: pitfalls in deletion screening in MSH2 and MLH1 genes". Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 13 (8): 983&ndash, 986. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201421. PMID 15870828.
↑ Wilting SM, Snijders PJ, Meijer GA, Ylstra B, van den Ijssel PR, Snijders AM,Albertson DG, Coffa J, Schouten JP, van de Wiel MA, Meijer CJ, Steenbergen RD (2006). "Increased gene copy numbers at chromosome 20q are frequent in both squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas of the cervix". J. Pathol. 209 (2): 220&ndash, 230. doi:10.1002/path.1966. PMID 16538612.
↑ Bunyan DJ, Eccles DM, Sillibourne J, Wilkins E, Thomas NS, Shea-Simonds J, Duncan PJ, Curtis CE, Robinson DO, Harvey JF, Cross NC (2004). "Dosage analysis of cancer predisposition genes by Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification". Br. J. Cancer. 91 (6): 1155&ndash, 1159. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602121. PMID 15475941.
↑ Gerdes T, Kirchhoff M, Lind AM, Larsen GV, Schwartz M, Lundsteen C (2005). "Computer-assisted prenatal aneuploidy screening for chromosome 13, 18, 21, X and Y based on multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA)". Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 13 (2): 171&ndash, 175. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201307. PMID 15483643.
↑ Hochstenbach R, Meijer J, van de Brug J, Vossebeld-Hoff I, Jansen R, van der Luijt RB, Sinke RJ, Page-Christiaens GC, Ploos van Amstel JK, de Pater JM (2005). "Rapid detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA)". Prenat. Diagn. 25 (11): 1032–1039. doi:10.1002/pd.1247. PMID 16231311.
↑ Illanes S, Avent N, Soothill PW (2005). "Cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma: an important advance to link fetal genetics to obstetric ultrasound". Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 25 (4): 317&ndash, 322. doi:10.1002/uog.1881. PMID 15789415.

External links

Template:WH Template:WS Template:Jb1

[1] Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G (2002). "Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification". Nucleic Acids Res. 30 (12): e57. doi:10.1093/nar/gnf056. PMID 12060695.

[2] Yau SC, Bobrow M, Mathew CG, Abbs SJ (1996). "Accurate diagnosis of carriers of deletions and duplications in Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy by fluorescent dosage analysis". J. Med. Genet. 33 (7): 550&ndash, 558. PMID 8818939.

[3] List of MLPA related articles

[4] Volikos E, Robinson J, Aittomaki K, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen H, Westerman AM, de Rooji FW, Vogel T, Moeslein G, Launonen V, Tomlinson IP, Silver AR, Aaltonen LA (2006). "LKB1 exonic and whole gene deletions are a common cause of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome". J. Med. Genet. 43 (5): e18. doi:10.1136/jmg.2005.039875. PMID 16648371.

[5] Procter M, Chou LS, Tang W, Jama M, Mao R (2006). "Molecular diagnosis of Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes by methylation-specific melting analysis and methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification". Clin. Chem. 52 (7): 1276&ndash, 1283. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2006.067603. PMID 16690734.

[6] Wehner M, Mangold E, Sengteller M, Friedrichs N, Aretz S, Friedl W, Propping P, Pagenstecher C (2005). "Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: pitfalls in deletion screening in MSH2 and MLH1 genes". Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 13 (8): 983&ndash, 986. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201421. PMID 15870828.

[7] Wilting SM, Snijders PJ, Meijer GA, Ylstra B, van den Ijssel PR, Snijders AM,Albertson DG, Coffa J, Schouten JP, van de Wiel MA, Meijer CJ, Steenbergen RD (2006). "Increased gene copy numbers at chromosome 20q are frequent in both squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas of the cervix". J. Pathol. 209 (2): 220&ndash, 230. doi:10.1002/path.1966. PMID 16538612.

[8] Bunyan DJ, Eccles DM, Sillibourne J, Wilkins E, Thomas NS, Shea-Simonds J, Duncan PJ, Curtis CE, Robinson DO, Harvey JF, Cross NC (2004). "Dosage analysis of cancer predisposition genes by Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification". Br. J. Cancer. 91 (6): 1155&ndash, 1159. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602121. PMID 15475941.

[9] Gerdes T, Kirchhoff M, Lind AM, Larsen GV, Schwartz M, Lundsteen C (2005). "Computer-assisted prenatal aneuploidy screening for chromosome 13, 18, 21, X and Y based on multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA)". Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 13 (2): 171&ndash, 175. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201307. PMID 15483643.

[10] Hochstenbach R, Meijer J, van de Brug J, Vossebeld-Hoff I, Jansen R, van der Luijt RB, Sinke RJ, Page-Christiaens GC, Ploos van Amstel JK, de Pater JM (2005). "Rapid detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA)". Prenat. Diagn. 25 (11): 1032–1039. doi:10.1002/pd.1247. PMID 16231311.

[11] Illanes S, Avent N, Soothill PW (2005). "Cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma: an important advance to link fetal genetics to obstetric ultrasound". Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 25 (4): 317&ndash, 322. doi:10.1002/uog.1881. PMID 15789415.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]