Spinal cord compression laboratory findings: Difference between revisions
Aditya Ganti (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Aditya Ganti (talk | contribs) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{CMG}} ; {{AE}} {{ADG}} | {{CMG}} ; {{AE}} {{ADG}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Spinal cord compression is diagnosed based on clinical | [[Spinal cord compression]] is diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and imaging studies. Laboratory studies play a minimal role in diagnosing [[spinal cord compression]] expect in accessing the patient's condition preoperatively and to exclude any infection. | ||
==Laboratory findings== | ==Laboratory findings== | ||
Spinal cord compression is diagnosed based on clinical | [[Spinal cord compression]] is diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and imaging studies. Laboratory studies like [[Complete blood count|CBC,]] [[CSF]], [[Clotting|clotting studies]] and electrolyte exam helpful in excluding infection as a cause and are employed preoperatively.<ref name="pmid10447289">{{cite journal |vauthors=Rigamonti D, Liem L, Sampath P, Knoller N, Namaguchi Y, Schreibman DL, Sloan MA, Wolf A, Zeidman S |title=Spinal epidural abscess: contemporary trends in etiology, evaluation, and management |journal=Surg Neurol |volume=52 |issue=2 |pages=189–96; discussion 197 |year=1999 |pmid=10447289 |doi= |url=}}</ref> | ||
*CBC shows increased neutrophil count in cases of infection. | *[[Complete blood count|CBC]] shows increased [[neutrophil]] count in cases of infection. | ||
*[[ESR]] and [[CRP]] | *[[ESR]] and [[CRP]] may be elevated. | ||
*Blood and CSF cultures are positive in case of an epidural abscess or osteomyelitis. | *[[Blood]] and [[CSF]] cultures are positive in case of an [[epidural abscess]] or [[osteomyelitis]]. | ||
*Tumor biopsy positive for malignant cells if compression of spinal cord is due to malignancy | *Tumor biopsy positive for [[Malignant|malignant cells]] if compression of spinal cord is due to [[malignancy]]. | ||
*Urodynamic studies reveal reduced bladder contractility and sphincter dysfunction. | *[[Urodynamics|Urodynamic studies]] reveal reduced bladder contractility and sphincter dysfunction. | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
Latest revision as of 12:49, 25 April 2017
|
Spinal Cord Compression Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Spinal cord compression laboratory findings On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Spinal cord compression laboratory findings |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Spinal cord compression laboratory findings |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Ganti M.B.B.S. [2]
Overview
Spinal cord compression is diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and imaging studies. Laboratory studies play a minimal role in diagnosing spinal cord compression expect in accessing the patient's condition preoperatively and to exclude any infection.
Laboratory findings
Spinal cord compression is diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and imaging studies. Laboratory studies like CBC, CSF, clotting studies and electrolyte exam helpful in excluding infection as a cause and are employed preoperatively.[1]
- CBC shows increased neutrophil count in cases of infection.
- ESR and CRP may be elevated.
- Blood and CSF cultures are positive in case of an epidural abscess or osteomyelitis.
- Tumor biopsy positive for malignant cells if compression of spinal cord is due to malignancy.
- Urodynamic studies reveal reduced bladder contractility and sphincter dysfunction.