Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia MRI: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Categories)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia}}
{{Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia}}
{{CMG}};  
{{CMG}}; {{shyam}}


==Overview==
==Overview==
 
There is no specific role for MRI in diagnosis of HIT. However, MRI can be useful to help delineate a bleeding or thrombotic complication of HIT in a specific anatomical area, similar to the role of a CT scan. MRI offers better anatomical detail and is thus more sensitive that CT scan. However, the test is more expensive, so one must weigh the cost-benefit ratio. MRI is particularly useful for suspected [[dural venous sinus]] thrombosis.


==MRI==
==MRI==
There is no specific role for MRI in diagnosis of HIT. However, MRI of a particular anatomic area can help better delineate thrombosis or bleeding if a CT with contrast (CT angiography) cannot be performed. For example, if a patient has renal dysfunction that precludes use of iodinated contrast with CT scan, MRI may be useful.
* '''MRI brain with venography''': This can help diagnose a [[cerebral venous thrombosis]]. MRI is the gold standard test for diagnosis of [[cerebral venous thrombosis]] or [[dural venous sinus thrombosis]].<ref name="pmid22368772">{{cite journal| author=Chiewvit P, Piyapittayanan S, Poungvarin N| title=Cerebral venous thrombosis: diagnosis dilemma. | journal=Neurol Int | year= 2011 | volume= 3 | issue= 3 | pages= e13 | pmid=22368772 | doi=10.4081/ni.2011.e13 | pmc=3286153 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=22368772  }} </ref> CT scan will not reveal a thrombosis with as great anatomical detail.
* '''MRI abdomen or pelvis''': This can help reveal intra-abdominal or intrapelvic bleeding or thrombosis. However, a CT scan is able to reveal these conditions at a much lower cost.
* '''MRI of the extremities''': MRI is particularly useful for delineating soft tissue abnormalities, such as bleeding into musculature or nerves.


==Reference==
==Reference==

Latest revision as of 21:16, 1 August 2017

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia MRI On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia MRI

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia MRI

CDC on Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia MRI

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia MRI in the news

Blogs on Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia MRI

Directions to Hospitals Treating Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Risk calculators and risk factors for Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia MRI

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Shyam Patel [2]

Overview

There is no specific role for MRI in diagnosis of HIT. However, MRI can be useful to help delineate a bleeding or thrombotic complication of HIT in a specific anatomical area, similar to the role of a CT scan. MRI offers better anatomical detail and is thus more sensitive that CT scan. However, the test is more expensive, so one must weigh the cost-benefit ratio. MRI is particularly useful for suspected dural venous sinus thrombosis.

MRI

There is no specific role for MRI in diagnosis of HIT. However, MRI of a particular anatomic area can help better delineate thrombosis or bleeding if a CT with contrast (CT angiography) cannot be performed. For example, if a patient has renal dysfunction that precludes use of iodinated contrast with CT scan, MRI may be useful.

  • MRI brain with venography: This can help diagnose a cerebral venous thrombosis. MRI is the gold standard test for diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis or dural venous sinus thrombosis.[1] CT scan will not reveal a thrombosis with as great anatomical detail.
  • MRI abdomen or pelvis: This can help reveal intra-abdominal or intrapelvic bleeding or thrombosis. However, a CT scan is able to reveal these conditions at a much lower cost.
  • MRI of the extremities: MRI is particularly useful for delineating soft tissue abnormalities, such as bleeding into musculature or nerves.

Reference

  1. Chiewvit P, Piyapittayanan S, Poungvarin N (2011). "Cerebral venous thrombosis: diagnosis dilemma". Neurol Int. 3 (3): e13. doi:10.4081/ni.2011.e13. PMC 3286153. PMID 22368772.

Template:WS Template:WH