Sandbox: CR: Difference between revisions
Arzu Kalayci (talk | contribs) Created page with "__NOTOC__ {{Aortic stenosis}} {{CMG}},{{AE}}{{AKK}}" |
Arzu Kalayci (talk | contribs) |
||
(52 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{CMG}},{{AE}}{{AKK}} | {{CMG}},{{AE}}{{AKK}} | ||
==ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/ STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease== | |||
==Revascularization to Improve Survival Compared With Medical Therapy (DO NOT EDIT)== | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 80%; text-align: justify;" | |||
! style="width:12%" | '''Anatomic Setting''' | |||
! style="width:80%" | ''' COR''' | |||
! style="width:8%" | '''LOE''' | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="3" | '''UPLM or complex CAD''' | |||
|- | |||
| CABG and PCI || bgcolor="LightGreen" | I—Heart Team approach recommended || bgcolor="LightBlue" | C | |||
|- | |||
| CABG and PCI || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIa—Calculation of STS and SYNTAX scores || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="3" | '''UPLM''' | |||
|- | |||
| CABG || bgcolor="LightGreen" | I || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| PCI || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIa - For SIHD when both of the following are present: | |||
'''1)''' Anatomic conditions associated with a low risk of PCI procedural complications and a high likelihood of good long-term outcome (e.g., a low SYNTAX score of ≤ 22, ostial or trunk left main CAD) '''2)''' Clinical characteristics that predict a significantly increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes (e.g., STS-predicted risk of operative mortality ≥ 5%) | |||
| bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| PCI || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIa—For UA/NSTEMI if not a CABG candidate || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| PCI || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIa—For STEMI when distal coronary flow is TIMI flow grade <3 and PCI can be performed more rapidly and safely than CABG || bgcolor="LightBlue" | C | |||
|- | |||
| PCI || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIb—For SIHD when both of the following are present:1) Anatomic conditions associated with a low to intermediate risk of PCI procedural complications and an intermediate to high likelihood of good long-term outcome (e.g., low-intermediate SYNTAX score of <33, bifurcation left main CAD) 2) Clinical characteristics that predict an increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes (e.g., moderate—severe COPD, disability from prior stroke, or prior cardiac surgery; STS-predicted operative mortality >2%) || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| PCI || bgcolor="LightCoral" | III: Harm—For SIHD in patients (versus performing CABG) with unfavorable anatomy for PCI and who are good candidates for CABG || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="3" | '''3-vessel disease with or without proximal LAD artery disease''' | |||
|- | |||
| CABG || bgcolor="LightGreen" | I || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIa—It is reasonable to choose CABG over PCI in patients with complex 3-vessel CAD (e.g., SYNTAX score >22) who are good candidates for CABG. || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| PCI || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIb—Of uncertain benefit || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="3" | '''2-vessel disease with proximal LAD artery disease''' | |||
|- | |||
| CABG || bgcolor="LightGreen" | I || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| PCI || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIb—Of uncertain benefit || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="3" | '''2-vessel disease without proximal LAD artery disease''' | |||
|- | |||
| CABG || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIa—With extensive ischemia || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| CABG || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIb—Of uncertain benefit without extensive ischemia || bgcolor="LightBlue" | C | |||
|- | |||
| CABG || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIb—Of uncertain benefit || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="3" |'''1-vessel proximal LAD artery disease''' | |||
|- | |||
| CABG || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIa—With LIMA for long-term benefit || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| PCI || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIb—With LIMA for long-term benefit || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| || 1-vessel proximal LAD artery disease || | |||
|- | |||
| CABG || bgcolor="LightCoral" | III: Harm || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| PCI || bgcolor="LightCoral" | III: Harm || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="2" | '''LV dysfunction'''|| | |||
|- | |||
| CABG || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIa—EF 35% to 50% || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| CABG || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | IIb—EF <35% without significant left main CAD || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| PCI || Insufficient data || | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="3" |'''Survivors of sudden cardiac death with presumed ischemia-mediated VT''' | |||
|- | |||
| CABG || bgcolor="LightGreen" | I || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| PCI || bgcolor="LightGreen" | I || bgcolor="LightBlue" | C | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="3" | '''No anatomic or physiological criteria for revascularization''' | |||
|- | |||
| CABG || bgcolor="LightCoral" | III: Harm || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| PCI || bgcolor="LightCoral" | III: Harm || bgcolor="LightBlue" | B | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="3" |'''CABG''' indicates coronary artery bypass graft; '''CAD''', coronary artery disease; '''COPD''', chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; '''COR''', class of recommendation; '''EF''', ejection fraction; '''LAD''', left anterior descending; '''LIMA''', left internal mammary artery; '''LOE''', level of evidence; '''LV''', left ventricular; '''N/A''', not available; '''PCI''', percutaneous coronary intervention; '''SIHD''', stable ischemic heart disease; '''STEMI''', ST-elevation myocardial infarction; '''STS''', Society of Thoracic Surgeons; '''SYNTAX''', Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with '''TAXUS''' and Cardiac Surgery; '''TIMI''', Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction; '''UA/NSTEMI''', unstable angina/non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction; '''UPLM''', unprotected left main disease; and VT, ventricular tachycardia. | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 80%; text-align: justify;" | |||
|- | |||
| '''Noninvasive Risk Stratification''' | |||
|- | |||
| '''High risk (>3% annual death or MI)''' | |||
'''1.''' Severe resting LV dysfunction (LVEF <35%) not readily explained by noncoronary causes | |||
'''2.''' Resting perfusion abnormalities ≥10% of the myocardium in patients without prior history or evidence of MI | |||
'''3.''' Stress ECG findings including ≥2 mm of ST-segment depression at low workload or persisting into recovery, exercise-induced ST-segment elevation, or | |||
exercise-induced VT/VF | |||
'''4.''' Severe stress-induced LV dysfunction (peak exercise LVEF <45% or drop in LVEF with stress ≥10%) | |||
'''5.''' Stress-induced perfusion abnormalities encumbering ≥10% myocardium or stress segmental scores indicating multiple vascular territories with | |||
abnormalities | |||
'''6.''' Stress-induced LV dilation | |||
'''7.''' Inducible wall motion abnormality (involving >2 segments or 2 coronary beds) | |||
'''8.''' Wall motion abnormality developing at low dose of dobutamine (≤ 10 mg/kg/min) or at a low heart rate (<120 beats/min) | |||
'''9.''' CAC score >400 Agatston units | |||
'''10.''' Multivessel obstructive CAD (≥70% stenosis) or left main stenosis (≥50% stenosis) on CCTA | |||
|- | |||
| '''Intermediate risk (1% to 3% annual death or MI)''' | |||
'''1.''' Mild/moderate resting LV dysfunction (LVEF 35% to 49%) not readily explained by noncoronary causes | |||
'''2'''. Resting perfusion abnormalities in 5% to 9.9% of the myocardium in patients without a history or prior evidence of MI | |||
'''3.''' ≥1 mm of ST-segment depression occurring with exertional symptoms | |||
'''4.''' Stress-induced perfusion abnormalities encumbering 5% to 9.9% of the myocardium or stress segmental scores (in multiple segments) indicating 1 vascular territory with abnormalities but without LV dilation | |||
'''5.''' Small wall motion abnormality involving 1 to 2 segments and only 1 coronary bed | |||
'''6.''' CAC score 100 to 399 Agatston units | |||
'''7.''' One vessel CAD with ≥70% stenosis or moderate CAD stenosis (50% to 69% stenosis) in ≥2 arteries on CCTA | |||
|- | |||
|'''Low risk (<1% annual death or MI)''' | |||
'''1.''' Low-risk treadmill score (score ≥5) or no new ST segment changes or exercise-induced chest pain symptoms; when achieving maximal levels of exercise | |||
'''2.''' Normal or small myocardial perfusion defect at rest or with stress encumbering <5% of the myocardium* | |||
'''3.''' Normal stress or no change of limited resting wall motion abnormalities during stress | |||
'''4.''' CAC score <100 Agaston units | |||
5. No coronary stenosis >50% on CCTA | |||
|- | |||
|CAC indicates coronary artery calcium; CAD, coronary artery disease; CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; and MI, myocardial infarction. | |||
|} | |||
== One Vessel Disease== | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 80%; text-align: justify;" | |||
! colspan="9" style="width:52%" | '''Appropriate Use Score (1-9)''' | |||
|- | |||
|'''One-Vessel Disease''' || colspan="2" | '''Asymptomatic''' || colspan="6" | '''Ischemic Symptoms''' | |||
|- | |||
|One-Vessel Disease || colspan="2" |Not on AA Therapy or With AA Therapy|| colspan="2" | Not on AA Therapy|| colspan="2" | On 1 AA Drug (BB Preferred)|| colspan="2" | On ≥2 AA Drugs | |||
|- | |||
|Indication ||PCI || CABG ||PCI || CABG ||PCI ||CABG ||PCI || CABG | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | '''No Proximal LAD or Proximal Left Dominant LCX Involvement''' | |||
|- | |||
| Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (2) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (1) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (2) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) | |||
|- | |||
| Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) | |||
|- | |||
| No stress test performed or, if performed, results are indeterminate - FFR ≤0.80 || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (2) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | '''Proximal LAD or Proximal Left Dominant LCX Involvement Present''' | |||
|- | |||
| Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) | |||
|- | |||
| Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) | |||
|- | |||
| No stress test performed or, if performed, results are indeterminate - FFR ≤0.80 || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | A indicates appropriate; AA, antianginal; BB, beta blockers; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; FFR, fractional flow reserve; iFR, instant wave-free ratio; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; LCX, left circumflex artery; M, may be appropriate; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and R, rarely appropriate. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range of 4 to 6 indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario. | |||
|} | |||
==Two-Vessel Disease== | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 80%; text-align: justify;" | |||
! colspan="9" style="width:52%" | '''Appropriate Use Score (1-9)''' | |||
|- | |||
|'''Two-Vessel Disease''' || colspan="2" | '''Asymptomatic''' || colspan="6" | '''Ischemic Symptoms''' | |||
|- | |||
|Two-Vessel Disease || colspan="2" |Not on AA Therapy or With AA Therapy|| colspan="2" | Not on AA Therapy|| colspan="2" | On 1 AA Drug (BB Preferred)|| colspan="2" | On ≥2 AA Drugs | |||
|- | |||
|Indication ||PCI || CABG ||PCI || CABG ||PCI ||CABG ||PCI || CABG | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | No Proximal LAD Involvement | |||
|- | |||
| Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (2) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) | |||
|- | |||
| Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) | |||
|- | |||
| No stress test performed or, if performed, results are indeterminate - FFR ≤0.80 in both vessels || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | '''Proximal LAD Involvement and No Diabetes Present''' | |||
|- | |||
| Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) | |||
|- | |||
| Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) | |||
|- | |||
| No stress test performed or, if performed, results are indeterminate - FFR ≤0.80 in both vessels || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | '''Proximal LAD Involvement With Diabetes Present''' | |||
|- | |||
| Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) | |||
|- | |||
| Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) | |||
|- | |||
| No stress test performed or, if performed, results are indeterminate - FFR ≤0.80 in both vessels || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | A indicates appropriate; AA, antianginal; BB, beta blockers; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; FFR, fractional flow reserve; iFR, instant wave-free ratio; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; M, may be appropriate; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and R, rarely appropriate. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range of 4 to 6 indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario. | |||
|} | |||
==Three-Vessel Disease== | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 80%; text-align: justify;" | |||
! colspan="9" style="width:52%" | '''Appropriate Use Score (1-9)''' | |||
|- | |||
|'''Three-Vessel Disease''' || colspan="2" | '''Asymptomatic''' || colspan="6" | '''Ischemic Symptoms''' | |||
|- | |||
|Three-Vessel Disease || colspan="2" |Not on AA Therapy or With AA Therapy|| colspan="2" | Not on AA Therapy|| colspan="2" | On 1 AA Drug (BB Preferred)|| colspan="2" | On ≥2 AA Drugs | |||
|- | |||
|Indication ||PCI || CABG ||PCI || CABG ||PCI ||CABG ||PCI || CABG | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | '''Low Disease Complexity (e.g., Focal Stenoses, SYNTAX ≤22)''' | |||
|- | |||
| Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) | |||
|- | |||
| Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing - No diabetes || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) | |||
|- | |||
| Low-risk findings on non-invasive testing - Diabetes present || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) | |||
|- | |||
| Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing - Diabetes present|| bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | '''Intermediate or High Disease Complexity (e.g. Multiple Features of Complexity as Noted Previously, SYNTAX >22)''' | |||
|- | |||
| Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing - No diabetes || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) | |||
|- | |||
| Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing - No diabetes || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) | |||
|- | |||
|Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing - Diabetes present || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) | |||
|- | |||
|Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing - Diabetes present || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | A indicates appropriate; AA, antianginal; BB, beta blockers; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; M, may be appropriate; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and SYNTAX, Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery trial. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range of 4 to 6 indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario. | |||
|} | |||
==Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis== | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 80%; text-align: justify;" | |||
! colspan="9" style="width:52%" | '''Appropriate Use Score (1-9)''' | |||
|- | |||
|'''Left Main Disease''' || colspan="2" | '''Asymptomatic''' || colspan="6" | '''Ischemic Symptoms''' | |||
|- | |||
| Left Main Disease || colspan="2" |Not on AA Therapy or With AA Therapy|| colspan="2" | Not on AA Therapy|| colspan="2" | On 1 AA Drug (BB Preferred)|| colspan="2" | On ≥2 AA Drugs | |||
|- | |||
|Indication ||PCI || CABG ||PCI || CABG ||PCI ||CABG ||PCI || CABG | |||
|- | |||
| Isolated LMCA disease - Ostial or midshaft stenosis || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) | |||
|- | |||
| Isolated LMCA disease - Bifurcation involvement || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) | |||
|- | |||
|LMCA disease - Ostial or mid shaft stenosis - Concurrent multi vessel disease - Low disease burden (e.g., 1–2 additional focal stenoses, SYNTAX score ≤22) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) | |||
|- | |||
|Ostial or mid shaft stenosis - Concurrent multi vessel disease - Intermediate or high disease burden (e.g., 1–2 additional bifurcation stenosis, long stenoses, SYNTAX score >22) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) | |||
|- | |||
|Ostial or mid shaft stenosis - Concurrent multi vessel disease - Intermediate or high disease burden (e.g., 1–2 additional bifurcation stenosis, long stenoses, SYNTAX score >22) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) | |||
|- | |||
|LMCA disease - Bifurcation involvement - Low disease burden in other vessels (e.g., 1–2 additional focal stenosis, SYNTAX score ≤22) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) | |||
|- | |||
|LMCA disease - Bifurcation involvement - Intermediate or high disease burden in other vessels (e.g., 1–2 additional bifurcation stenosis, long stenoses, SYNTAX score >22) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (9) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | A indicates appropriate; AA, antianginal; BB, beta blockers; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; LMCA, left main coronary artery; M, may be appropriate; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; R, rarely appropriate; and SYNTAX, Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery trial. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range of 4 to 6 indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario. | |||
|} | |||
==IMA to LAD Patent and Without Significant Stenoses== | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 80%; text-align: justify;" | |||
! colspan="9" style="width:52%" | '''Appropriate Use Score (1-9)''' | |||
|- | |||
|'''IMA to LAD Patent and Without Significant Stenoses''' || colspan="2" | '''Asymptomatic''' || colspan="6" | '''Ischemic Symptoms''' | |||
|- | |||
| || colspan="2" |Not on AA Therapy or With AA Therapy|| colspan="2" | Not on AA Therapy|| colspan="2" | On 1 AA Drug (BB Preferred)|| colspan="2" | On ≥2 AA Drugs | |||
|- | |||
|Indication ||PCI || CABG ||PCI || CABG ||PCI ||CABG ||PCI || CABG | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | '''Stenosis Supplying 1 Territory Disease (Bypass Graft or Native Artery) to Territory Other Than Anterior''' | |||
|- | |||
| Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (1) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (2) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) | |||
|- | |||
| Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) | |||
| bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) | |||
|- | |||
| No stress test performed or, if performed, the results are indeterminate - FFR of stenosis ≤0.80 || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | '''Stenoses Supplying 2 Territories (Bypass Graft or Native Artery, Either 2 Separate Vessels or Sequential Graft Supplying 2 Territories) Not Including Anterior Territory''' | |||
|- | |||
| Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (2) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) | |||
|- | |||
| Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | A indicates appropriate; AA, Antianginal; BB, beta blockers; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; FFR, fractional flow reserve; iFR, instant wave-free ratio; IMA, internal mammary artery; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; M, may be appropriate; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and R, rarely appropriate. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range of 4 to 6 indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario. | |||
|} | |||
==IMA to LAD Not Patent== | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 80%; text-align: justify;" | |||
! colspan="9" style="width:52%" | '''Appropriate Use Score (1-9)''' | |||
|- | |||
|'''IMA to LAD Not Patent''' || colspan="2" | '''Asymptomatic''' || colspan="6" | '''Ischemic Symptoms''' | |||
|- | |||
| || colspan="2" |Not on AA Therapy or With AA Therapy|| colspan="2" | Not on AA Therapy|| colspan="2" | On 1 AA Drug (BB Preferred)|| colspan="2" | On ≥2 AA Drugs | |||
|- | |||
|Indication ||PCI || CABG ||PCI || CABG ||PCI ||CABG ||PCI || CABG | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | '''Stenosis Supplying 1-Territory Disease (Bypass Graft or Native Artery)–Anterior (LAD) Territory''' | |||
|- | |||
| Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing|| bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightCoral" | R (3) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) | |||
|- | |||
| Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) | |||
|- | |||
| No stress test performed or, if performed, the results are indeterminate - FFR of stenosis ≤0.80 || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | '''Stenoses Supplying 2 Territories (Bypass Graft or Native Artery, Either 2 Separate Vessels or Sequential Graft Supplying 2 Territories) LAD Plus Other Territory''' | |||
|- | |||
| Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing|| bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (4) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) | |||
|- | |||
| Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | '''Stenoses Supplying 3 Territories (Bypass Graft or Native Arteries, Separate Vessels, Sequential Grafts, or Combination Thereof) LAD Plus 2 Other Territories''' | |||
|- | |||
| Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing|| bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (5) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LemonChiffon" | M (6) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) | |||
|- | |||
| Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (7) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) || bgcolor="LightGreen" | A (8) | |||
|- | |||
| colspan="9" | A indicates appropriate; AA, Antianginal; BB, beta blockers; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; FFR, fractional flow reserve; iFR, instant wave-free ratio; IMA, internal mammary artery; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; M, may be appropriate; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and R, rarely appropriate. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range of 4 to 6 indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario. | |||
|} | |||
==Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis== |
Latest revision as of 05:12, 27 October 2017
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1],Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Arzu Kalayci, M.D. [2]
ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/ STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease
Revascularization to Improve Survival Compared With Medical Therapy (DO NOT EDIT)
Anatomic Setting | COR | LOE |
---|---|---|
UPLM or complex CAD | ||
CABG and PCI | I—Heart Team approach recommended | C |
CABG and PCI | IIa—Calculation of STS and SYNTAX scores | B |
UPLM | ||
CABG | I | B |
PCI | IIa - For SIHD when both of the following are present:
1) Anatomic conditions associated with a low risk of PCI procedural complications and a high likelihood of good long-term outcome (e.g., a low SYNTAX score of ≤ 22, ostial or trunk left main CAD) 2) Clinical characteristics that predict a significantly increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes (e.g., STS-predicted risk of operative mortality ≥ 5%) |
B |
PCI | IIa—For UA/NSTEMI if not a CABG candidate | B |
PCI | IIa—For STEMI when distal coronary flow is TIMI flow grade <3 and PCI can be performed more rapidly and safely than CABG | C |
PCI | IIb—For SIHD when both of the following are present:1) Anatomic conditions associated with a low to intermediate risk of PCI procedural complications and an intermediate to high likelihood of good long-term outcome (e.g., low-intermediate SYNTAX score of <33, bifurcation left main CAD) 2) Clinical characteristics that predict an increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes (e.g., moderate—severe COPD, disability from prior stroke, or prior cardiac surgery; STS-predicted operative mortality >2%) | B |
PCI | III: Harm—For SIHD in patients (versus performing CABG) with unfavorable anatomy for PCI and who are good candidates for CABG | B |
3-vessel disease with or without proximal LAD artery disease | ||
CABG | I | B |
IIa—It is reasonable to choose CABG over PCI in patients with complex 3-vessel CAD (e.g., SYNTAX score >22) who are good candidates for CABG. | B | |
PCI | IIb—Of uncertain benefit | B |
2-vessel disease with proximal LAD artery disease | ||
CABG | I | B |
PCI | IIb—Of uncertain benefit | B |
2-vessel disease without proximal LAD artery disease | ||
CABG | IIa—With extensive ischemia | B |
CABG | IIb—Of uncertain benefit without extensive ischemia | C |
CABG | IIb—Of uncertain benefit | B |
1-vessel proximal LAD artery disease | ||
CABG | IIa—With LIMA for long-term benefit | B |
PCI | IIb—With LIMA for long-term benefit | B |
1-vessel proximal LAD artery disease | ||
CABG | III: Harm | B |
PCI | III: Harm | B |
LV dysfunction | ||
CABG | IIa—EF 35% to 50% | B |
CABG | IIb—EF <35% without significant left main CAD | B |
PCI | Insufficient data | |
Survivors of sudden cardiac death with presumed ischemia-mediated VT | ||
CABG | I | B |
PCI | I | C |
No anatomic or physiological criteria for revascularization | ||
CABG | III: Harm | B |
PCI | III: Harm | B |
CABG indicates coronary artery bypass graft; CAD, coronary artery disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COR, class of recommendation; EF, ejection fraction; LAD, left anterior descending; LIMA, left internal mammary artery; LOE, level of evidence; LV, left ventricular; N/A, not available; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; SIHD, stable ischemic heart disease; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction; STS, Society of Thoracic Surgeons; SYNTAX, Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery; TIMI, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction; UA/NSTEMI, unstable angina/non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction; UPLM, unprotected left main disease; and VT, ventricular tachycardia. |
Noninvasive Risk Stratification |
High risk (>3% annual death or MI)
1. Severe resting LV dysfunction (LVEF <35%) not readily explained by noncoronary causes 2. Resting perfusion abnormalities ≥10% of the myocardium in patients without prior history or evidence of MI 3. Stress ECG findings including ≥2 mm of ST-segment depression at low workload or persisting into recovery, exercise-induced ST-segment elevation, or exercise-induced VT/VF 4. Severe stress-induced LV dysfunction (peak exercise LVEF <45% or drop in LVEF with stress ≥10%) 5. Stress-induced perfusion abnormalities encumbering ≥10% myocardium or stress segmental scores indicating multiple vascular territories with abnormalities 6. Stress-induced LV dilation 7. Inducible wall motion abnormality (involving >2 segments or 2 coronary beds) 8. Wall motion abnormality developing at low dose of dobutamine (≤ 10 mg/kg/min) or at a low heart rate (<120 beats/min) 9. CAC score >400 Agatston units 10. Multivessel obstructive CAD (≥70% stenosis) or left main stenosis (≥50% stenosis) on CCTA |
Intermediate risk (1% to 3% annual death or MI)
1. Mild/moderate resting LV dysfunction (LVEF 35% to 49%) not readily explained by noncoronary causes 2. Resting perfusion abnormalities in 5% to 9.9% of the myocardium in patients without a history or prior evidence of MI 3. ≥1 mm of ST-segment depression occurring with exertional symptoms 4. Stress-induced perfusion abnormalities encumbering 5% to 9.9% of the myocardium or stress segmental scores (in multiple segments) indicating 1 vascular territory with abnormalities but without LV dilation 5. Small wall motion abnormality involving 1 to 2 segments and only 1 coronary bed 6. CAC score 100 to 399 Agatston units 7. One vessel CAD with ≥70% stenosis or moderate CAD stenosis (50% to 69% stenosis) in ≥2 arteries on CCTA |
Low risk (<1% annual death or MI)
1. Low-risk treadmill score (score ≥5) or no new ST segment changes or exercise-induced chest pain symptoms; when achieving maximal levels of exercise 2. Normal or small myocardial perfusion defect at rest or with stress encumbering <5% of the myocardium* 3. Normal stress or no change of limited resting wall motion abnormalities during stress 4. CAC score <100 Agaston units 5. No coronary stenosis >50% on CCTA |
CAC indicates coronary artery calcium; CAD, coronary artery disease; CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; and MI, myocardial infarction. |
One Vessel Disease
Appropriate Use Score (1-9) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
One-Vessel Disease | Asymptomatic | Ischemic Symptoms | ||||||
One-Vessel Disease | Not on AA Therapy or With AA Therapy | Not on AA Therapy | On 1 AA Drug (BB Preferred) | On ≥2 AA Drugs | ||||
Indication | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG |
No Proximal LAD or Proximal Left Dominant LCX Involvement | ||||||||
Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing | R (2) | R (1) | R (3) | R (2) | M (4) | R (3) | A (7) | M (5) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (4) | R (3) | M (5) | M (4) | M (6) | M (4) | A (8) | M (6) |
No stress test performed or, if performed, results are indeterminate - FFR ≤0.80 | M (4) | R (2) | M (5) | R (3) | M (6) | M (4) | A (8) | M (6) |
Proximal LAD or Proximal Left Dominant LCX Involvement Present | ||||||||
Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (4) | R (3) | M (4) | M (4) | M (5) | M (5) | A (7) | A (7) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (5) | M (5) | M (6) | M (6) | A (7) | A (7) | A (8) | A (8) |
No stress test performed or, if performed, results are indeterminate - FFR ≤0.80 | M (5) | M (5) | M (6) | M (6) | M (6) | M (6) | A (8) | A (7) |
A indicates appropriate; AA, antianginal; BB, beta blockers; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; FFR, fractional flow reserve; iFR, instant wave-free ratio; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; LCX, left circumflex artery; M, may be appropriate; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and R, rarely appropriate. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range of 4 to 6 indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario. |
Two-Vessel Disease
Appropriate Use Score (1-9) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Two-Vessel Disease | Asymptomatic | Ischemic Symptoms | ||||||
Two-Vessel Disease | Not on AA Therapy or With AA Therapy | Not on AA Therapy | On 1 AA Drug (BB Preferred) | On ≥2 AA Drugs | ||||
Indication | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG |
No Proximal LAD Involvement | ||||||||
Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing | R (3) | R (2) | M (4) | R (3) | M (5) | M (4) | A (7) | M (6) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (5) | M (4) | M (6) | M (5) | M (6) | M (4) | A (7) | M (6) |
No stress test performed or, if performed, results are indeterminate - FFR ≤0.80 in both vessels | M (5) | M (4) | M (6) | M (4) | A (7) | M (5) | A (8) | A (8) |
Proximal LAD Involvement and No Diabetes Present | ||||||||
Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (4) | M (4) | M (5) | M (5) | M (6) | M (6) | A (7) | A (7) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (6) | M (6) | A (7) | A (7) | A (7) | A (7) | A (8) | A (8) |
No stress test performed or, if performed, results are indeterminate - FFR ≤0.80 in both vessels | M (6) | M (6) | M (6) | M (6) | A (7) | A (7) | A (8) | A (8) |
Proximal LAD Involvement With Diabetes Present | ||||||||
Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (4) | M (5) | M (4) | M (6) | M (6) | A (7) | A (7) | A (8) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (5) | A (7) | M (6) | A (7) | A (7) | A (8) | A (8) | A (9) |
No stress test performed or, if performed, results are indeterminate - FFR ≤0.80 in both vessels | M (5) | M (6) | M (6) | A (7) | A (7) | A (8) | A (7) | A (8) |
A indicates appropriate; AA, antianginal; BB, beta blockers; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; FFR, fractional flow reserve; iFR, instant wave-free ratio; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; M, may be appropriate; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and R, rarely appropriate. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range of 4 to 6 indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario. |
Three-Vessel Disease
Appropriate Use Score (1-9) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Three-Vessel Disease | Asymptomatic | Ischemic Symptoms | ||||||
Three-Vessel Disease | Not on AA Therapy or With AA Therapy | Not on AA Therapy | On 1 AA Drug (BB Preferred) | On ≥2 AA Drugs | ||||
Indication | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG |
Low Disease Complexity (e.g., Focal Stenoses, SYNTAX ≤22) | ||||||||
Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (4) | M (5) | M (5) | M (6) | M (6) | M (6) | A (7) | A (7) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing - No diabetes | M (6) | A (7) | A (7) | A (7) | A (7) | A (8) | A (8) | A (8) |
Low-risk findings on non-invasive testing - Diabetes present | M (4) | M (6) | M (5) | M (6) | A (6) | A (7) | A (7) | A (8) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing - Diabetes present | M (6) | A (7) | M (6) | A (8) | A (7) | A (8) | A (7) | A (9) |
Intermediate or High Disease Complexity (e.g. Multiple Features of Complexity as Noted Previously, SYNTAX >22) | ||||||||
Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing - No diabetes | M (4) | M (6) | M (4) | A (7) | M (5) | A (7) | M (6) | A (8) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing - No diabetes | M (5) | A (7) | M (6) | A (7) | M (6) | A (8) | M (6) | A (9) |
Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing - Diabetes present | M (4) | A (7) | M (4) | A (7) | M (5) | A (8) | M (6) | A (9) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing - Diabetes present | M (4) | A (8) | M (5) | A (8) | M (5) | A (8) | M (6) | A (9) |
A indicates appropriate; AA, antianginal; BB, beta blockers; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; M, may be appropriate; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and SYNTAX, Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery trial. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range of 4 to 6 indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario. |
Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis
Appropriate Use Score (1-9) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Left Main Disease | Asymptomatic | Ischemic Symptoms | ||||||
Left Main Disease | Not on AA Therapy or With AA Therapy | Not on AA Therapy | On 1 AA Drug (BB Preferred) | On ≥2 AA Drugs | ||||
Indication | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG |
Isolated LMCA disease - Ostial or midshaft stenosis | M (6) | A (8) | A (7) | A (8) | A (7) | A (9) | A (7) | A (9) |
Isolated LMCA disease - Bifurcation involvement | M (5) | A (8) | M (5) | A (8) | M (5) | A (9) | M (6) | A (9) |
LMCA disease - Ostial or mid shaft stenosis - Concurrent multi vessel disease - Low disease burden (e.g., 1–2 additional focal stenoses, SYNTAX score ≤22) | M (6) | A (8) | M (6) | A (9) | A (7) | A (9) | A (7) | A (9) |
Ostial or mid shaft stenosis - Concurrent multi vessel disease - Intermediate or high disease burden (e.g., 1–2 additional bifurcation stenosis, long stenoses, SYNTAX score >22) | M (4) | A (9) | M (4) | A (9) | M (4) | A (9) | M (4) | A (9) |
Ostial or mid shaft stenosis - Concurrent multi vessel disease - Intermediate or high disease burden (e.g., 1–2 additional bifurcation stenosis, long stenoses, SYNTAX score >22) | M (4) | A (9) | M (4) | A (9) | M (4) | A (9) | M (4) | A (9) |
LMCA disease - Bifurcation involvement - Low disease burden in other vessels (e.g., 1–2 additional focal stenosis, SYNTAX score ≤22) | M (4) | A (8) | M (5) | A (8) | M (5) | A (9) | M (6) | A (9) |
LMCA disease - Bifurcation involvement - Intermediate or high disease burden in other vessels (e.g., 1–2 additional bifurcation stenosis, long stenoses, SYNTAX score >22) | R (3) | A (8) | R (3) | A (9) | R (3) | A (9) | R (3) | A (9) |
A indicates appropriate; AA, antianginal; BB, beta blockers; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; LMCA, left main coronary artery; M, may be appropriate; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; R, rarely appropriate; and SYNTAX, Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery trial. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range of 4 to 6 indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario. |
IMA to LAD Patent and Without Significant Stenoses
Appropriate Use Score (1-9) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMA to LAD Patent and Without Significant Stenoses | Asymptomatic | Ischemic Symptoms | ||||||
Not on AA Therapy or With AA Therapy | Not on AA Therapy | On 1 AA Drug (BB Preferred) | On ≥2 AA Drugs | |||||
Indication | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG |
Stenosis Supplying 1 Territory Disease (Bypass Graft or Native Artery) to Territory Other Than Anterior | ||||||||
Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing | R (3) | R (1) | R (3) | R (2) | M (6) | R (3) | A (7) | M (4) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (5) | R (3) | M (5) | R (3) | A (7) | M (4) | A (8) | M (5) |
No stress test performed or, if performed, the results are indeterminate - FFR of stenosis ≤0.80 | M (4) | R (3) | M (4) | R (3) | M (6) | M (4) | A (8) | M (5) |
Stenoses Supplying 2 Territories (Bypass Graft or Native Artery, Either 2 Separate Vessels or Sequential Graft Supplying 2 Territories) Not Including Anterior Territory | ||||||||
Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing | R (3) | R (2) | M (4) | R (3) | M (6) | R (3) | A (7) | M (5) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (5) | R (3) | M (5) | M (4) | A (7) | M (5) | A (8) | M (6) |
A indicates appropriate; AA, Antianginal; BB, beta blockers; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; FFR, fractional flow reserve; iFR, instant wave-free ratio; IMA, internal mammary artery; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; M, may be appropriate; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and R, rarely appropriate. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range of 4 to 6 indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario. |
IMA to LAD Not Patent
Appropriate Use Score (1-9) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMA to LAD Not Patent | Asymptomatic | Ischemic Symptoms | ||||||
Not on AA Therapy or With AA Therapy | Not on AA Therapy | On 1 AA Drug (BB Preferred) | On ≥2 AA Drugs | |||||
Indication | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG | PCI | CABG |
Stenosis Supplying 1-Territory Disease (Bypass Graft or Native Artery)–Anterior (LAD) Territory | ||||||||
Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (4) | R (3) | M (5) | R (3) | M (6) | M (4) | A (7) | M (5) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (6) | M (4) | M (6) | M (4) | A (7) | M (5) | A (8) | M (6) |
No stress test performed or, if performed, the results are indeterminate - FFR of stenosis ≤0.80 | M (5) | M (4) | M (6) | M (4) | A (7) | M (5) | A (7) | M (6) |
Stenoses Supplying 2 Territories (Bypass Graft or Native Artery, Either 2 Separate Vessels or Sequential Graft Supplying 2 Territories) LAD Plus Other Territory | ||||||||
Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (5) | M (4) | M (6) | M (4) | A (7) | M (5) | A (7) | M (6) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (6) | M (5) | A (7) | M (6) | A (7) | A (7) | A (8) | A (8) |
Stenoses Supplying 3 Territories (Bypass Graft or Native Arteries, Separate Vessels, Sequential Grafts, or Combination Thereof) LAD Plus 2 Other Territories | ||||||||
Low-risk findings on noninvasive testing | M (5) | M (5) | M (6) | M (5) | M (6) | M (6) | A (7) | A (7) |
Intermediate- or high-risk findings on noninvasive testing | A (7) | A (7) | A (7) | A (7) | A (7) | A (7) | A (8) | A (8) |
A indicates appropriate; AA, Antianginal; BB, beta blockers; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; FFR, fractional flow reserve; iFR, instant wave-free ratio; IMA, internal mammary artery; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; M, may be appropriate; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and R, rarely appropriate. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range of 4 to 6 indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario. |