Autoimmune pancreatitis laboratory findings: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


==Overview==
==Overview==
Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis may include increased serum IgG4 levels and hypergammaglobulinemia (>2 times the upper limit of normal in most patients), antilactoferrin antibody, anticarbonic anhydrase II antibody, other autoantibodies (ANA), rheumatoid factor (RF), IgG4-positive plasma cells, elevated serum alkaline phosphatase levels (ALP), elevated serum aminotransferases, ESR, and CA19-9.
Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis may include increased [[serum]] IgG4 levels and [[hypergammaglobulinemia]] (>2 times the upper limit of normal in most patients), antilactoferrin antibody, anticarbonic anhydrase II antibody, other [[autoantibodies]] (ANA), [[rheumatoid factor]] (RF), IgG4-positive plasma cells, elevated [[serum]] [[alkaline phosphatase]] levels (ALP), elevated [[serum]] [[aminotransferases]], [[ESR]], and [[CA19-9]].


==Laboratory Findings==
==Laboratory Findings==
*Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis include:<ref name="pmid14614606">{{cite journal |vauthors=Kamisawa T, Funata N, Hayashi Y, Eishi Y, Koike M, Tsuruta K, Okamoto A, Egawa N, Nakajima H |title=A new clinicopathological entity of IgG4-related autoimmune disease |journal=J. Gastroenterol. |volume=38 |issue=10 |pages=982–4 |year=2003 |pmid=14614606 |doi=10.1007/s00535-003-1175-y |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid15044886">{{cite journal |vauthors=Shinji A, Sano K, Hamano H, Unno H, Fukushima M, Nakamura N, Akamatsu T, Kawa S, Kiyosawa K |title=Autoimmune pancreatitis is closely associated with gastric ulcer presenting with abundant IgG4-bearing plasma cell infiltration |journal=Gastrointest. Endosc. |volume=59 |issue=4 |pages=506–11 |year=2004 |pmid=15044886 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid14736977">{{cite journal |vauthors=Takeda S, Haratake J, Kasai T, Takaeda C, Takazakura E |title=IgG4-associated idiopathic tubulointerstitial nephritis complicating autoimmune pancreatitis |journal=Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=474–6 |year=2004 |pmid=14736977 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid16508232">{{cite journal |vauthors=Saeki T, Saito A, Hiura T, Yamazaki H, Emura I, Ueno M, Miyamura S, Gejyo F |title=Lymphoplasmacytic infiltration of multiple organs with immunoreactivity for IgG4: IgG4-related systemic disease |journal=Intern. Med. |volume=45 |issue=3 |pages=163–7 |year=2006 |pmid=16508232 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid17634963">{{cite journal |vauthors=Umemura T, Zen Y, Hamano H, Kawa S, Nakanuma Y, Kiyosawa K |title=Immunoglobin G4-hepatopathy: association of immunoglobin G4-bearing plasma cells in liver with autoimmune pancreatitis |journal=Hepatology |volume=46 |issue=2 |pages=463–71 |year=2007 |pmid=17634963 |doi=10.1002/hep.21700 |url=}}</ref>
Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis include:<ref name="pmid14614606">{{cite journal |vauthors=Kamisawa T, Funata N, Hayashi Y, Eishi Y, Koike M, Tsuruta K, Okamoto A, Egawa N, Nakajima H |title=A new clinicopathological entity of IgG4-related autoimmune disease |journal=J. Gastroenterol. |volume=38 |issue=10 |pages=982–4 |year=2003 |pmid=14614606 |doi=10.1007/s00535-003-1175-y |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid15044886">{{cite journal |vauthors=Shinji A, Sano K, Hamano H, Unno H, Fukushima M, Nakamura N, Akamatsu T, Kawa S, Kiyosawa K |title=Autoimmune pancreatitis is closely associated with gastric ulcer presenting with abundant IgG4-bearing plasma cell infiltration |journal=Gastrointest. Endosc. |volume=59 |issue=4 |pages=506–11 |year=2004 |pmid=15044886 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid14736977">{{cite journal |vauthors=Takeda S, Haratake J, Kasai T, Takaeda C, Takazakura E |title=IgG4-associated idiopathic tubulointerstitial nephritis complicating autoimmune pancreatitis |journal=Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=474–6 |year=2004 |pmid=14736977 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid16508232">{{cite journal |vauthors=Saeki T, Saito A, Hiura T, Yamazaki H, Emura I, Ueno M, Miyamura S, Gejyo F |title=Lymphoplasmacytic infiltration of multiple organs with immunoreactivity for IgG4: IgG4-related systemic disease |journal=Intern. Med. |volume=45 |issue=3 |pages=163–7 |year=2006 |pmid=16508232 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid17634963">{{cite journal |vauthors=Umemura T, Zen Y, Hamano H, Kawa S, Nakanuma Y, Kiyosawa K |title=Immunoglobin G4-hepatopathy: association of immunoglobin G4-bearing plasma cells in liver with autoimmune pancreatitis |journal=Hepatology |volume=46 |issue=2 |pages=463–71 |year=2007 |pmid=17634963 |doi=10.1002/hep.21700 |url=}}</ref>
**Increased serum IgG4 levels and hypergammaglobulinemia (>2 times the upper limit of normal in most patients). Using a cutoff of 135 mg/dL, serum IgG4  has following sensitivity and specificity:
*Increased [[serum]] IgG4 levels and [[hypergammaglobulinemia]] (>2 times the upper limit of normal in most patients). Using a cutoff of 135 mg/dL, serum IgG4  has following [[sensitivity]] and [[specificity]]:
***Sensitivity 95%
**[[Sensitivity]] 95%
***Specificity 97%
**[[Specificity]] 97%
**Antilactoferrin antibody
*Antilactoferrin antibody
**Anticarbonic anhydrase II antibody
*Anticarbonic anhydrase II [[antibody]]
**Anti-plasminogen-binding protein (PBP) peptide antibodies<ref name="pmid19940298">{{cite journal |vauthors=Frulloni L, Lunardi C, Simone R, Dolcino M, Scattolini C, Falconi M, Benini L, Vantini I, Corrocher R, Puccetti A |title=Identification of a novel antibody associated with autoimmune pancreatitis |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=361 |issue=22 |pages=2135–42 |year=2009 |pmid=19940298 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa0903068 |url=}}</ref>
*Anti-plasminogen-binding protein (PBP) peptide antibodies<ref name="pmid19940298">{{cite journal |vauthors=Frulloni L, Lunardi C, Simone R, Dolcino M, Scattolini C, Falconi M, Benini L, Vantini I, Corrocher R, Puccetti A |title=Identification of a novel antibody associated with autoimmune pancreatitis |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=361 |issue=22 |pages=2135–42 |year=2009 |pmid=19940298 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa0903068 |url=}}</ref>
**Rheumatoid factor (RF)
*[[Rheumatoid factor]] (RF)
**IgG4-positive plasma cells
*IgG4-positive [[plasma cells]]
**Elevated serum alkaline phosphatase levels (ALP)
*Elevated [[serum]] [[alkaline phosphatase]] levels (ALP)
**Elevated serum aminotransferases
*Elevated [[serum]] [[aminotransferases]]
**Elevated ESR
*Elevated [[ESR]]
**Elevated CA19-9
*Elevated [[CA19-9]]
==== Fecal tests: ====
 
===== (a) Sudan staining of feces: =====
* A non-specific, qualitative test that is no longer used for the diagnosis of steatorrhea.
 
===== (b) 72-hour quantitative fecal fat (Gold standard): =====
* A quantitaive test that determines fecal fat excretion for over 24hrs.
* Fecal fat excretion of >7g/day is diagnostic of malabsorption.
* Patients with steatorrhea usually have an excretion of >10g of fat per day.
 
===== (c) Faecal elastase measurement (Test of choice): =====
*The most sensitive and specific test for pancreatic exocrine dysfunction.
*It can be done with a single random stool sample.
*The results are independent of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy.
*A value of less than 200 ug/g indicates pancreatic insufficiency.<ref name="UpTo">{{cite web |author=Freedman SD |url=http://www.uptodate.com/patients/content/topic.do?topicKey=~EzkfCtNwumVrg |title=Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis in adults |format= |work=UpToDate  |accessdate=}}</ref><ref name="pmid15285176">{{cite journal |vauthors=Keim V, Teich N, Moessner J |title=Clinical value of a new fecal elastase test for detection of chronic pancreatitis |journal=Clin. Lab. |volume=49 |issue=5-6 |pages=209–15 |year=2003 |pmid=15285176 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid12093988">{{cite journal |vauthors=Walkowiak J, Herzig KH, Strzykala K, Przyslawski J, Krawczynski M |title=Fecal elastase-1 is superior to fecal chymotrypsin in the assessment of pancreatic involvement in cystic fibrosis |journal=Pediatrics |volume=110 |issue=1 Pt 1 |pages=e7 |year=2002 |pmid=12093988 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid15343184">{{cite journal |vauthors=Borowitz D, Baker SS, Duffy L, Baker RD, Fitzpatrick L, Gyamfi J, Jarembek K |title=Use of fecal elastase-1 to classify pancreatic status in patients with cystic fibrosis |journal=J. Pediatr. |volume=145 |issue=3 |pages=322–6 |year=2004 |pmid=15343184 |doi=10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.04.049 |url=}}</ref>
=== Pancreatic function tests: ===
 
===== (a) Direct/ Invasive tests: =====
* Direct tests are used to assess pancreatic insufficiency in the early course of disease when patient has clinical symptoms but no radiology findings.
* Direct tests involve pancreatic stimulation via meal or hormonal secretagogues and assessment of pancreatic secretions in the duodenal fluid.
* Direct tests along with radiographic findings (pancreatic calcifications) are stll considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.<ref name="pmid11276375">{{cite journal |vauthors=Boeck WG, Adler G, Gress TM |title=Pancreatic function tests: when to choose, what to use |journal=Curr Gastroenterol Rep |volume=3 |issue=2 |pages=95–100 |year=2001 |pmid=11276375 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid12641496">{{cite journal |vauthors=Chowdhury RS, Forsmark CE |title=Review article: Pancreatic function testing |journal=Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. |volume=17 |issue=6 |pages=733–50 |year=2003 |pmid=12641496 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid15508057">{{cite journal |vauthors=Siegmund E, Löhr JM, Schuff-Werner P |title=[The diagnostic validity of non-invasive pancreatic function tests--a meta-analysis] |language=German |journal=Z Gastroenterol |volume=42 |issue=10 |pages=1117–28 |year=2004 |pmid=15508057 |doi=10.1055/s-2004-813604 |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid16633964">{{cite journal |vauthors=Ammann RW |title=Diagnosis and management of chronic pancreatitis: current knowledge |journal=Swiss Med Wkly |volume=136 |issue=11-12 |pages=166–74 |year=2006 |pmid=16633964 |doi=2006/11/smw-11182 |url=}}</ref>
* The limitation of direct tests is that they are costly and cumbersome.<ref name="pmid11276375">{{cite journal |vauthors=Boeck WG, Adler G, Gress TM |title=Pancreatic function tests: when to choose, what to use |journal=Curr Gastroenterol Rep |volume=3 |issue=2 |pages=95–100 |year=2001 |pmid=11276375 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid12641496">{{cite journal |vauthors=Chowdhury RS, Forsmark CE |title=Review article: Pancreatic function testing |journal=Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. |volume=17 |issue=6 |pages=733–50 |year=2003 |pmid=12641496 |doi= |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid15508057">{{cite journal |vauthors=Siegmund E, Löhr JM, Schuff-Werner P |title=[The diagnostic validity of non-invasive pancreatic function tests--a meta-analysis] |language=German |journal=Z Gastroenterol |volume=42 |issue=10 |pages=1117–28 |year=2004 |pmid=15508057 |doi=10.1055/s-2004-813604 |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid16633964">{{cite journal |vauthors=Ammann RW |title=Diagnosis and management of chronic pancreatitis: current knowledge |journal=Swiss Med Wkly |volume=136 |issue=11-12 |pages=166–74 |year=2006 |pmid=16633964 |doi=2006/11/smw-11182 |url=}}</ref>
* Direct tests include:
** [[Secretin]] stimulation test
** Pancreozymin-secretin test
[[Secretin]] stimulation test is considered the gold standard functional test for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.
 
The observation that bi-carbonate production is impaired early in chronic pancreatitis has led to the rationale of use of this test in early stages of disease:
*Sensitivity - 82%<ref name="pmid23711627">{{cite journal |vauthors=Ketwaroo G, Brown A, Young B, Kheraj R, Sawhney M, Mortele KJ, Najarian R, Tewani S, Dasilva D, Freedman S, Sheth S |title=Defining the accuracy of secretin pancreatic function testing in patients with suspected early chronic pancreatitis |journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. |volume=108 |issue=8 |pages=1360–6 |year=2013 |pmid=23711627 |pmc=5388854 |doi=10.1038/ajg.2013.148 |url=}}</ref>
*Specificity- 86%<ref name="pmid23711627">{{cite journal |vauthors=Ketwaroo G, Brown A, Young B, Kheraj R, Sawhney M, Mortele KJ, Najarian R, Tewani S, Dasilva D, Freedman S, Sheth S |title=Defining the accuracy of secretin pancreatic function testing in patients with suspected early chronic pancreatitis |journal=Am. J. Gastroenterol. |volume=108 |issue=8 |pages=1360–6 |year=2013 |pmid=23711627 |pmc=5388854 |doi=10.1038/ajg.2013.148 |url=}}</ref>
===== (b) Indirect/ Non-invasive tests: =====
Indirect tests are used to assess the complications of chronic pancreatitis.
* Indirect tests include:
** Faecal chymotrypsin, PABA, pancreolauryl
** Faecal elastase test
Indirect tests are not sensitive to assess pancreatic insufficiency in the early course of disease.<ref name="pmid16633964">{{cite journal |vauthors=Ammann RW |title=Diagnosis and management of chronic pancreatitis: current knowledge |journal=Swiss Med Wkly |volume=136 |issue=11-12 |pages=166–74 |year=2006 |pmid=16633964 |doi=2006/11/smw-11182 |url=}}</ref><ref name="pmid11179244">{{cite journal |vauthors=Etemad B, Whitcomb DC |title=Chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis, classification, and new genetic developments |journal=Gastroenterology |volume=120 |issue=3 |pages=682–707 |year=2001 |pmid=11179244 |doi= |url=}}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 14:46, 19 January 2018

Autoimmune pancreatitis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Autoimmune pancreatitis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Guidelines for Management

Case Studies

Case #1

Autoimmune pancreatitis laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Autoimmune pancreatitis laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Autoimmune pancreatitis laboratory findings

CDC on Autoimmune pancreatitis laboratory findings

Autoimmune pancreatitis laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Autoimmune pancreatitis laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Psoriasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Autoimmune pancreatitis laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Iqra Qamar M.D.[2]

Overview

Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis may include increased serum IgG4 levels and hypergammaglobulinemia (>2 times the upper limit of normal in most patients), antilactoferrin antibody, anticarbonic anhydrase II antibody, other autoantibodies (ANA), rheumatoid factor (RF), IgG4-positive plasma cells, elevated serum alkaline phosphatase levels (ALP), elevated serum aminotransferases, ESR, and CA19-9.

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis include:[1][2][3][4][5]

Fecal tests:

(a) Sudan staining of feces:
  • A non-specific, qualitative test that is no longer used for the diagnosis of steatorrhea.
(b) 72-hour quantitative fecal fat (Gold standard):
  • A quantitaive test that determines fecal fat excretion for over 24hrs.
  • Fecal fat excretion of >7g/day is diagnostic of malabsorption.
  • Patients with steatorrhea usually have an excretion of >10g of fat per day.
(c) Faecal elastase measurement (Test of choice):
  • The most sensitive and specific test for pancreatic exocrine dysfunction.
  • It can be done with a single random stool sample.
  • The results are independent of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy.
  • A value of less than 200 ug/g indicates pancreatic insufficiency.[7][8][9][10]

Pancreatic function tests:

(a) Direct/ Invasive tests:
  • Direct tests are used to assess pancreatic insufficiency in the early course of disease when patient has clinical symptoms but no radiology findings.
  • Direct tests involve pancreatic stimulation via meal or hormonal secretagogues and assessment of pancreatic secretions in the duodenal fluid.
  • Direct tests along with radiographic findings (pancreatic calcifications) are stll considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.[11][12][13][14]
  • The limitation of direct tests is that they are costly and cumbersome.[11][12][13][14]
  • Direct tests include:
    • Secretin stimulation test
    • Pancreozymin-secretin test

Secretin stimulation test is considered the gold standard functional test for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.

The observation that bi-carbonate production is impaired early in chronic pancreatitis has led to the rationale of use of this test in early stages of disease:

  • Sensitivity - 82%[15]
  • Specificity- 86%[15]
(b) Indirect/ Non-invasive tests:

Indirect tests are used to assess the complications of chronic pancreatitis.

  • Indirect tests include:
    • Faecal chymotrypsin, PABA, pancreolauryl
    • Faecal elastase test

Indirect tests are not sensitive to assess pancreatic insufficiency in the early course of disease.[14][16]

References

  1. Kamisawa T, Funata N, Hayashi Y, Eishi Y, Koike M, Tsuruta K, Okamoto A, Egawa N, Nakajima H (2003). "A new clinicopathological entity of IgG4-related autoimmune disease". J. Gastroenterol. 38 (10): 982–4. doi:10.1007/s00535-003-1175-y. PMID 14614606.
  2. Shinji A, Sano K, Hamano H, Unno H, Fukushima M, Nakamura N, Akamatsu T, Kawa S, Kiyosawa K (2004). "Autoimmune pancreatitis is closely associated with gastric ulcer presenting with abundant IgG4-bearing plasma cell infiltration". Gastrointest. Endosc. 59 (4): 506–11. PMID 15044886.
  3. Takeda S, Haratake J, Kasai T, Takaeda C, Takazakura E (2004). "IgG4-associated idiopathic tubulointerstitial nephritis complicating autoimmune pancreatitis". Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 19 (2): 474–6. PMID 14736977.
  4. Saeki T, Saito A, Hiura T, Yamazaki H, Emura I, Ueno M, Miyamura S, Gejyo F (2006). "Lymphoplasmacytic infiltration of multiple organs with immunoreactivity for IgG4: IgG4-related systemic disease". Intern. Med. 45 (3): 163–7. PMID 16508232.
  5. Umemura T, Zen Y, Hamano H, Kawa S, Nakanuma Y, Kiyosawa K (2007). "Immunoglobin G4-hepatopathy: association of immunoglobin G4-bearing plasma cells in liver with autoimmune pancreatitis". Hepatology. 46 (2): 463–71. doi:10.1002/hep.21700. PMID 17634963.
  6. Frulloni L, Lunardi C, Simone R, Dolcino M, Scattolini C, Falconi M, Benini L, Vantini I, Corrocher R, Puccetti A (2009). "Identification of a novel antibody associated with autoimmune pancreatitis". N. Engl. J. Med. 361 (22): 2135–42. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0903068. PMID 19940298.
  7. Freedman SD. "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis in adults". UpToDate.
  8. Keim V, Teich N, Moessner J (2003). "Clinical value of a new fecal elastase test for detection of chronic pancreatitis". Clin. Lab. 49 (5–6): 209–15. PMID 15285176.
  9. Walkowiak J, Herzig KH, Strzykala K, Przyslawski J, Krawczynski M (2002). "Fecal elastase-1 is superior to fecal chymotrypsin in the assessment of pancreatic involvement in cystic fibrosis". Pediatrics. 110 (1 Pt 1): e7. PMID 12093988.
  10. Borowitz D, Baker SS, Duffy L, Baker RD, Fitzpatrick L, Gyamfi J, Jarembek K (2004). "Use of fecal elastase-1 to classify pancreatic status in patients with cystic fibrosis". J. Pediatr. 145 (3): 322–6. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.04.049. PMID 15343184.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Boeck WG, Adler G, Gress TM (2001). "Pancreatic function tests: when to choose, what to use". Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 3 (2): 95–100. PMID 11276375.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Chowdhury RS, Forsmark CE (2003). "Review article: Pancreatic function testing". Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 17 (6): 733–50. PMID 12641496.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Siegmund E, Löhr JM, Schuff-Werner P (2004). "[The diagnostic validity of non-invasive pancreatic function tests--a meta-analysis]". Z Gastroenterol (in German). 42 (10): 1117–28. doi:10.1055/s-2004-813604. PMID 15508057.
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 Ammann RW (2006). "Diagnosis and management of chronic pancreatitis: current knowledge". Swiss Med Wkly. 136 (11–12): 166–74. doi:2006/11/smw-11182 Check |doi= value (help). PMID 16633964.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Ketwaroo G, Brown A, Young B, Kheraj R, Sawhney M, Mortele KJ, Najarian R, Tewani S, Dasilva D, Freedman S, Sheth S (2013). "Defining the accuracy of secretin pancreatic function testing in patients with suspected early chronic pancreatitis". Am. J. Gastroenterol. 108 (8): 1360–6. doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.148. PMC 5388854. PMID 23711627.
  16. Etemad B, Whitcomb DC (2001). "Chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis, classification, and new genetic developments". Gastroenterology. 120 (3): 682–707. PMID 11179244.

Template:WH Template:WS