Sacrococcygeal teratoma diagnostic study of choice: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{Sacrococcygeal teratoma}} | {{Sacrococcygeal teratoma}} | ||
{{CMG}}{{AE}}{{MGS}} | {{CMG}}{{AE}}{{MGS}}{{Sab}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
[[Ultrasound]] is the [[Diagnosis|diagnostic]] study of choice for sacrococcygeal teratoma. Findings on [[ultrasound]] include the presence of mass near the [[Anatomical terms of location|distal]] [[Vertebral column|spine]]. According to Gonzalez-Crussi System, sacrococcygeal teratoma is graded on a scale from 0 - 3 based on the [[histology]]. | |||
==Diagnostic Study of Choice== | ==Diagnostic Study of Choice== | ||
===Study of Choice=== | |||
==Grading | *[[Ultrasound]] is the [[Diagnosis|diagnostic]] study of choice for sacrococcygeal teratoma. | ||
According to Gonzalez-Crussi System, sacrococcygeal teratoma is graded on a scale from 0 - 3 | *Findings on [[ultrasound]] include the presence of mass near the [[Anatomical terms of location|distal]] [[Vertebral column|spine]]. | ||
===Grading=== | |||
According to Gonzalez-Crussi System, sacrococcygeal teratoma is graded on a scale from 0 - 3 based on the [[histology]]:<ref name="aa">{{cite journal | authors=Harms D, Zahn S, Göbel U, Schneider DT |title=Pathology and molecular biology of teratomas in childhood and adolescence |journal=Klin Padiatr |volume=218 |issue=6 |pages=296–302 |year=2006 |pmid=17080330 |doi=10.1055/s-2006-942271 |url=}}</ref> | |||
{| style="border: 0px; font-size: 90%; margin: 3px; width: 800px" | {| style="border: 0px; font-size: 90%; margin: 3px; width: 800px" |
Latest revision as of 18:33, 6 May 2019
Sacrococcygeal teratoma Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Echocardiography and Ultrasound |
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Sacrococcygeal teratoma diagnostic study of choice On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Sacrococcygeal teratoma diagnostic study of choice |
Sacrococcygeal teratoma diagnostic study of choice in the news |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Sacrococcygeal teratoma diagnostic study of choice |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mirdula Sharma, MBBS [2]Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[3]
Overview
Ultrasound is the diagnostic study of choice for sacrococcygeal teratoma. Findings on ultrasound include the presence of mass near the distal spine. According to Gonzalez-Crussi System, sacrococcygeal teratoma is graded on a scale from 0 - 3 based on the histology.
Diagnostic Study of Choice
Study of Choice
- Ultrasound is the diagnostic study of choice for sacrococcygeal teratoma.
- Findings on ultrasound include the presence of mass near the distal spine.
Grading
According to Gonzalez-Crussi System, sacrococcygeal teratoma is graded on a scale from 0 - 3 based on the histology:[1]
Grade | Microscopic Features |
---|---|
Grade 0 |
|
Grade I |
|
Grade II |
|
Grade III |
References
- ↑ Harms D, Zahn S, Göbel U, Schneider DT (2006). "Pathology and molecular biology of teratomas in childhood and adolescence". Klin Padiatr. 218 (6): 296–302. doi:10.1055/s-2006-942271. PMID 17080330.