Brucellosis laboratory findings: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Bot: Removing from Primary care)
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Brucellosis}}
{{Brucellosis}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{RT}} {{DL}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{RT}} {{DL}}{{VD}}


==Overview==
==Overview==
Brucellosis is diagnosed in a laboratory by finding [[Brucella]] organisms in samples of blood or [[bone marrow]]. Also, blood tests can be done to detect antibodies against the bacteria. If this method is used, two blood samples should be collected 2 weeks apart <ref>http://www.cdc.gov/brucellosis/</ref>.
The diagnosis of brucellosis can be confirmed by either a positive [[Bacterial cultures|bacterial culture]] or a positive titer of anti-[[Brucella|b''rucella'']] [[antibodies]] on serological testing.


==Laboratory Findings==
==Laboratory Findings==
* [[Complete blood count]]:
Laboratory findings of brucellosis include the following:<ref name="g" /><ref name=":0">Brucellosis "Dennis Kasper, Anthony Fauci, Stephen Hauser, Dan Longo, J. Larry Jameson, Joseph Loscalzo"Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 19e Accessed on December 9th, 2017</ref><ref>Colmenero JD, Reguera JM, Martos F, Sánchez-De-Mora D, Delgado M, Causse M; et al. (1996). [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=8699960 "Complications associated with Brucella melitensis infection: a study of 530 cases."]. ''Medicine (Baltimore)''. '''75''' (4): 195–211. PMID [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8699960 8699960]</ref><ref name=":1">Mantur BG, Amarnath SK, Shinde RS (2007). [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=17901634 "Review of clinical and laboratory features of human brucellosis."]. ''Indian J Med Microbiol''. '''25''' (3): 188–202. PMID [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17901634 17901634]</ref><ref>Pappas G, Akritidis N, Bosilkovski M, Tsianos E (2005). [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=15930423 "Brucellosis."]. ''N Engl J Med''. '''352''' (22): 2325–36. PMID [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15930423 15930423].</ref><ref name="pmid23236528">{{cite journal| author=Dean AS, Crump L, Greter H, Hattendorf J, Schelling E, Zinsstag J| title=Clinical manifestations of human brucellosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. | journal=PLoS Negl Trop Dis | year= 2012 | volume= 6 | issue= 12 | pages= e1929 | pmid=23236528 | doi=10.1371/journal.pntd.0001929 | pmc=3516581 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=23236528  }}</ref><ref>Young EJ (1995). [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=7546364 "Brucellosis: current epidemiology, diagnosis, and management."]. ''Curr Clin Top Infect Dis''. '''15''': 115–28. PMID [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7546364 7546364]</ref><ref>Aygen B, Doganay M, Sumerkan B, et al. Clinical manifestations, complications and treatment of brucellosis: a retrospective evaluation of 480 patients. Med Malad Infect 2002; 32:485.</ref><ref name="pmid21623056">{{cite journal| author=Zamani A, Kooraki S, Mohazab RA, Zamani N, Matloob R, Hayatbakhsh MR et al.| title=Epidemiological and clinical features of Brucella arthritis in 24 children. | journal=Ann Saudi Med | year= 2011 | volume= 31 | issue= 3 | pages= 270-3 | pmid=21623056 | doi=10.4103/0256-4947.81543 | pmc=3119967 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=21623056 }}</ref><ref>Mousa AM, Bahar RH, Araj GF, Koshy TS, Muhtaseb SA, al-Mudallal DS; et al. (1990). [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=2330811 "Neurological complications of brucella spondylitis."]. ''Acta Neurol Scand''. '''81''' (1): 16–23. PMID [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2330811 2330811]</ref><ref>Pappas G, Bosilkovski M, Akritidis N, Mastora M, Krteva L, Tsianos E (2003). [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=13130417 "Brucellosis and the respiratory system."]. ''Clin Infect Dis''. '''37''' (7): e95–9. PMID [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13130417 13130417]. [[Digital object identifier|doi]]:[http://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F378125 10.1086/378125]</ref><ref>Herrick JA, Lederman RJ, Sullivan B, et al. Brucella arteritis: clinical manifestations, treatment, and prognosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2014; 14:520.</ref><ref name="pmid18162038">{{cite journal| author=Ariza J, Bosilkovski M, Cascio A, Colmenero JD, Corbel MJ, Falagas ME et al.| title=Perspectives for the treatment of brucellosis in the 21st century: the Ioannina recommendations. | journal=PLoS Med | year= 2007 | volume= 4 | issue= 12 | pages= e317 | pmid=18162038 | doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0040317 | pmc=2222927 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=18162038  }}</ref>
**Mild leukopenia
{| class="wikitable"
**Mild anemia
! colspan="3" |Laboratory findings in Brucellosis
**Relative lymphocytosis
|-
**Thrombocytopenia
| rowspan="7" |Blood
* [[Liver function tests]]:
|[[Complete blood count]]
**Mild transaminasemia<ref name="pmid15930423">{{cite journal| author=Pappas G, Akritidis N, Bosilkovski M, Tsianos E| title=Brucellosis. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 2005 | volume= 352 | issue= 22 | pages= 2325-36 | pmid=15930423 | doi=10.1056/NEJMra050570 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=15930423 }} </ref><ref name="a">Brucellosis. CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/brucellosis/transmission/index.html. Accessed on February 1, 2016</ref>  
|Complete [[Blood]] Count may reveal:
 
*Mild [[leukopenia]]
Bacterial Isolation:
*Mild [[anemia]]
*The isolation and identification of Brucella can confirm a diagnosis of brucellosis. Brucella is most commonly isolated from blood cultures.
*[[Lymphocytosis|Relative lymphocytosis]]
*[[Thrombocytopenia]]
|-
|[[Erythrocyte sedimentation rate|ESR]]
|Normal or raised
|-
|[[CRP]]
|Normal or raised
|-
|[[Liver function tests|Liver function test]]
|Liver function test may reveal:
*Mild increase in [[hepatic]] [[enzymes]] 
*Mild increase in [[bilirubin]]
|-
|Culture
|
*The isolation and identification of [[Brucella|''Brucella'']] can confirm a diagnosis of brucellosis.  
*[[Brucella|''Brucella'']] is most commonly isolated from blood cultures (blood cultures are positive between the 7th and 21st day)
*It can also, however, be isolated from:
*It can also, however, be isolated from:
**Bone marrow
**[[Bone marrow]] ([[gold standard (test)|Gold standard test]])
***Gold standard
**[[Cerebrospinal fluid]]
**Cerebrospinal fluid
**[[Wounds]]
**Wounds
**[[Purulent]] [[discharge]]
**Purulent discharge
**[[Synovial fluid|Joint fluid]]<ref name="pmid15930423">{{cite journal| author=Pappas G, Akritidis N, Bosilkovski M, Tsianos E| title=Brucellosis. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 2005 | volume= 352 | issue= 22 | pages= 2325-36 | pmid=15930423 | doi=10.1056/NEJMra050570 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=15930423  }} </ref><ref name="g">Brucellosis. CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/brucellosis/clinicians/bacterial-isolation.html. Accessed on February 4, 2016</ref>
**Joint fluid<ref name="bb">Brucellosis. CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/brucellosis/clinicians/bacterial-isolation.html. Accessed on February 4, 2016</ref><ref name="pmid15930423">{{cite journal| author=Pappas G, Akritidis N, Bosilkovski M, Tsianos E| title=Brucellosis. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 2005 | volume= 352 | issue= 22 | pages= 2325-36 | pmid=15930423 | doi=10.1056/NEJMra050570 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=15930423  }} </ref>  
|-
 
|Serological tests
Serological tests:
|Serological Tests
*There are two types of serological tests, based on:
*'''There are two types of serological tests, based on:'''
**"Antibody production against lipopolysaccharide"
**Antibody production against [[lipopolysaccharide]]
**"Antibody production against other bacterial antigens"
**Antibody production against other [[bacterial]] [[antigens]]
*Brucella microagglutination test (BMAT):
*'''For a diagnosis to be made using serology, two serum samples are required:'''
**A modified version of the serum (tube) agglutination test (SAT), that can detect antibodies to Brucella species - abortus, melitensis or suis.  
**The first [[serum]] sample should be taken when a person is acutely ill (≤7 days after symptom onset)
**There is no serological test available to detect antibodies to B. canis.
**The second serum sample should be drawn 2-4 weeks later to check for a rise in [[antibodies]] (a fourfold or greater rise in antibodies would bean an individual is positive for brucellosis).
**An agglutination titre greater than 1:160 is considered significant in nonendemic areas.
**If submission of paired sera is not possible, a probable diagnosis can be made with a single serum sample.
**An agglutination titre greater than 1:320 is considered significant in endemic areas.
*'''Brucella microagglutination test (BMAT)'''
**Due to the similarity of the O polysaccharide of Brucella to that of various other Gram-negative bacteria (e.g. Francisella tularensis, Escherichia coli, Salmonella urbana, Yersinia enterocolitica, Vibrio cholerae, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) the appearance of cross-reactions of class M immunoglobulins may occur.
**A modified version of the serum (tube) agglutination test (SAT), that can detect antibodies to [[Brucella|''Brucella'']] species: [[Brucella abortus|abortus]], [[Brucella melitensis|melitensis]] or suis.  
**False-negative SAT may be caused by the presence of blocking antibodies (the prozone phenomenon) in the α2-globulin (IgA) and in the α-globulin (IgG) fractions.
**There is no [[Serological testing|serological test]] available to detect [[antibodies]] to [[Brucella canis|''B. canis'']].
**For a diagnosis to be made using serology, two serum samples are required.
**An '''''agglutination''''' '''''titre greater than 1:160''''' is considered '''significant in nonendemic areas'''.
***The first serum sample should be taken when a person is acutely ill (≤7 days after symptom onset)
**An '''''agglutination''''' '''''titre greater than 1:320''''' is considered '''significant in endemic areas'''.
***The second serum sample should be drawn 2-4 weeks later to check for a rise in antibodies (a fourfold or greater rise in antibodies would bean an individual is positive for brucellosis).
**Due to the similarity of the O [[polysaccharide]] of [[Brucella|''Brucella'']] to that of various other [[gram-negative bacteria]] (e.g. [[Francisella tularensis]], [[Escherichia coli]], Salmonella urbana, [[Yersinia enterocolitica]], [[Vibrio cholerae]], and [[Stenotrophomonas maltophilia]]) the appearance of cross-reactions of class [[Immunoglobulin M|M immunoglobulins]] may occur.
***If submission of paired sera is not possible, a probable diagnosis can be made with a single serum sample.
**False-negative SAT may be caused by the presence of blocking [[antibodies]] (the prozone phenomenon) in the α2-globulin ([[IgA]]) and in the α-globulin ([[IgG]]) fractions.
**Serology is not currently available to monitor persons for RB51 vaccine exposure or for Brucella canis exposure.
**[[Serology]] is not currently available to monitor persons for RB51 vaccine exposure or for [[Brucella canis|''Brucella canis'']] exposure.
*Rose Bengal:
*'''Rose Bengal'''
**It's positive predictive value is approximately 99% for patients with achute and chronic brucellosis.
**Rose bengal has a positive predictive value is approximately 99% for patients with acute and chronic brucellosis.
**It measures IgM and IgG antibodies.
**Rose bengal measures [[IgM]] and [[IgG]] antibodies.
*2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME):
*'''2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME)'''
**It measures IgG antibodies.
**2-ME measures [[IgG]] [[antibodies]]
*Antihuman globulin (Coombs):
*'''Antihuman globulin (Coombs)'''
**Used in chronic brucellosis patients with negative seroagglutination because they have IgG non-agglutinating antibodies
**Used in chronic brucellosis patients with negative seroagglutination because they have [[IgG]] non-agglutinating antibodies.
*Indirect enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA):
*'''Indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)'''
**ELISA typically uses cytoplasmic proteins as antigens.  
**[[ELISA test|ELISA]] typically uses cytoplasmic [[proteins]] as [[antigens]].  
**It measures IgM, IgG, and IgA with better sensitivity and specificity than the SAT in most recent comparative studies
**[[ELISA test|ELISA]] measures [[IgM]], [[IgG]], and [[IgA]] with better [[Sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] and [[Specificity (tests)|specificity]] than the SAT in most recent comparative studies.
*Dipstick assays:
*'''Dipstick assays'''
**New and promising, based on the binding of Brucella IgM antibodies, and found to be simple, accurate, and rapid
**New and promising, based on the binding of [[Brucella|''Brucella'']] [[IgM]] [[antibodies]], and found to be simple, accurate and rapid.
*Brucellacapt test:
*'''Brucellacapt test'''
**A single-step immunocapture assay for the detection of total anti-Brucella antibodies, is an increasingly used adjunctive test when resources permit
**A single-step immunocapture assay for the detection of total anti-[[Brucella|''Brucella'']] antibodies, is an increasingly used adjunctive test when resources permit.
*PCR:
|-
**Is fast and should be specific.
|Molecular tests
**Many varieties of PCR have been developed (e.g. nested PCR, realtime PCR and PCR-ELISA) and found to have superior specificity and sensitivity in detecting both primary infection and relapse after treatment.  
|'''PCR'''
**Unfortunately, these have yet to be standardized for routine use, and some centres have reported persistent PCR positivity after clinically successful treatment, fuelling the controversy about the existence of prolonged chronic brucellosis.<ref name="pmid15930423">{{cite journal| author=Pappas G, Akritidis N, Bosilkovski M, Tsianos E| title=Brucellosis. | journal=N Engl J Med | year= 2005 | volume= 352 | issue= 22 | pages= 2325-36 | pmid=15930423 | doi=10.1056/NEJMra050570 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=15930423  }} </ref><ref name="a">Brucellosis. CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/brucellosis/transmission/index.html. Accessed on February 1, 2016</ref><ref name="b">Brucellosis. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brucellosis. Accessed on January 29, 2016</ref></ref><ref name="c">Brucelosis. Wikipedia. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brucelosis. Accessed on February 2, 2016</ref>
*[[PCR]] is a fast and specific diagnostic tool to confirm the diagnosis of brucellosis
*Many varieties of [[PCR]] have been developed (e.g. nested [[PCR]], realtime [[PCR]] and [[PCR]]-[[ELISA test|ELISA]]) and found to have superior [[Specificity (tests)|specificity]] and [[Sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] in detecting both primary infection and relapse after treatment.  
*Unfortunately, these have yet to be standardized for routine use, and some centres have reported persistent [[PCR]] positivity after clinically successful treatment, fuelling the controversy about the existence of prolonged [[Chronic (medicine)|chronic]] brucellosis.<ref name="pmid15930423" /><ref name="b">Brucellosis. CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/brucellosis/transmission/index.html. Accessed on February 1, 2016</ref><ref name="a">Brucellosis. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brucellosis. Accessed on January 29, 2016</ref><ref name="aa">Brucelosis. Wikipedia. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brucelosis. Accessed on February 2, 2016</ref>
|}


==== Tissue Biopsy ====
[[Liver]] and [[lymph node]] biopsy may reveal non-[[Caseous necrosis|caseating]] [[granuloma]].<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" />


* Demonstration of the agent: blood cultures in tryptose broth, bone marrow cultures. The growth of brucellae is extremely slow (they can take until 2 months to grow) and the culture poses a risk to laboratory personnel due to high infectivity of brucellae.
==== CSF analysis ====
* Demonstration of antibodies against the agent either with the classic Huddleson, Wright and/or Bengal Rose reactions, either with ELISA or the 2-mercaptoethanol assay for IgM antibodies associated with chronic disease
[[CSF analysis]] may reveal [[lymphocytosis]] and low glucose level.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" />


==== Synovial fluid analysis ====
[[Synovial fluid]] analysis may reveal [[lymphocytic]] predominate with [[granulocyte]] count which  does not generally exceed 15,000 cells/microL and low [[glucose]] levels.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" />


==Gallery==
==Gallery==
Line 95: Line 119:
==References==
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
[[Category:Bacterial diseases]]
[[Category:Occupational diseases]]
[[Category:Zoonoses]]
[[Category:Infectious disease]]
[[Category:Biological weapons]]
[[Category:Disease]]
{{WH}}
{{WH}}
{{WS}}
{{WS}}
[[Category:Disease]]
[[Category:Up-To-Date]]
[[Category:Pulmonology]]
[[Category:Hepatology]]
[[Category:Rheumatology]]
[[Category:Nephrology]]
[[Category:Emergency medicine]]
[[Category:Infectious disease]]

Latest revision as of 20:44, 29 July 2020

Brucellosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Brucellosis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Principles of diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

X-Ray

CT Scan

MRI

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Brucellosis laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Brucellosis laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Brucellosis laboratory findings

CDC on Brucellosis laboratory findings

Brucellosis laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Brucellosis laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Brucellosis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Brucellosis laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [2] Danitza LukacVishal Devarkonda, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

The diagnosis of brucellosis can be confirmed by either a positive bacterial culture or a positive titer of anti-brucella antibodies on serological testing.

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory findings of brucellosis include the following:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]

Laboratory findings in Brucellosis
Blood Complete blood count Complete Blood Count may reveal:
ESR Normal or raised
CRP Normal or raised
Liver function test Liver function test may reveal:
Culture
Serological tests Serological Tests
  • There are two types of serological tests, based on:
  • For a diagnosis to be made using serology, two serum samples are required:
    • The first serum sample should be taken when a person is acutely ill (≤7 days after symptom onset)
    • The second serum sample should be drawn 2-4 weeks later to check for a rise in antibodies (a fourfold or greater rise in antibodies would bean an individual is positive for brucellosis).
    • If submission of paired sera is not possible, a probable diagnosis can be made with a single serum sample.
  • Brucella microagglutination test (BMAT)
  • Rose Bengal
    • Rose bengal has a positive predictive value is approximately 99% for patients with acute and chronic brucellosis.
    • Rose bengal measures IgM and IgG antibodies.
  • 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME)
  • Antihuman globulin (Coombs)
    • Used in chronic brucellosis patients with negative seroagglutination because they have IgG non-agglutinating antibodies.
  • Indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
  • Dipstick assays
    • New and promising, based on the binding of Brucella IgM antibodies, and found to be simple, accurate and rapid.
  • Brucellacapt test
    • A single-step immunocapture assay for the detection of total anti-Brucella antibodies, is an increasingly used adjunctive test when resources permit.
Molecular tests PCR
  • PCR is a fast and specific diagnostic tool to confirm the diagnosis of brucellosis
  • Many varieties of PCR have been developed (e.g. nested PCR, realtime PCR and PCR-ELISA) and found to have superior specificity and sensitivity in detecting both primary infection and relapse after treatment.
  • Unfortunately, these have yet to be standardized for routine use, and some centres have reported persistent PCR positivity after clinically successful treatment, fuelling the controversy about the existence of prolonged chronic brucellosis.[14][15][16][17]

Tissue Biopsy

Liver and lymph node biopsy may reveal non-caseating granuloma.[2][4]

CSF analysis

CSF analysis may reveal lymphocytosis and low glucose level.[2][4]

Synovial fluid analysis

Synovial fluid analysis may reveal lymphocytic predominate with granulocyte count which does not generally exceed 15,000 cells/microL and low glucose levels.[2][4]

Gallery

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Brucellosis. CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/brucellosis/clinicians/bacterial-isolation.html. Accessed on February 4, 2016
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Brucellosis "Dennis Kasper, Anthony Fauci, Stephen Hauser, Dan Longo, J. Larry Jameson, Joseph Loscalzo"Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 19e Accessed on December 9th, 2017
  3. Colmenero JD, Reguera JM, Martos F, Sánchez-De-Mora D, Delgado M, Causse M; et al. (1996). "Complications associated with Brucella melitensis infection: a study of 530 cases."Medicine (Baltimore)75 (4): 195–211. PMID 8699960
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Mantur BG, Amarnath SK, Shinde RS (2007). "Review of clinical and laboratory features of human brucellosis."Indian J Med Microbiol25 (3): 188–202. PMID 17901634
  5. Pappas G, Akritidis N, Bosilkovski M, Tsianos E (2005). "Brucellosis."N Engl J Med352 (22): 2325–36. PMID 15930423.
  6. Dean AS, Crump L, Greter H, Hattendorf J, Schelling E, Zinsstag J (2012). "Clinical manifestations of human brucellosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis". PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 6 (12): e1929. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001929. PMC 3516581. PMID 23236528.
  7. Young EJ (1995). "Brucellosis: current epidemiology, diagnosis, and management."Curr Clin Top Infect Dis15: 115–28. PMID 7546364
  8. Aygen B, Doganay M, Sumerkan B, et al. Clinical manifestations, complications and treatment of brucellosis: a retrospective evaluation of 480 patients. Med Malad Infect 2002; 32:485.
  9. Zamani A, Kooraki S, Mohazab RA, Zamani N, Matloob R, Hayatbakhsh MR; et al. (2011). "Epidemiological and clinical features of Brucella arthritis in 24 children". Ann Saudi Med. 31 (3): 270–3. doi:10.4103/0256-4947.81543. PMC 3119967. PMID 21623056.
  10. Mousa AM, Bahar RH, Araj GF, Koshy TS, Muhtaseb SA, al-Mudallal DS; et al. (1990). "Neurological complications of brucella spondylitis."Acta Neurol Scand81 (1): 16–23. PMID 2330811
  11. Pappas G, Bosilkovski M, Akritidis N, Mastora M, Krteva L, Tsianos E (2003). "Brucellosis and the respiratory system."Clin Infect Dis37 (7): e95–9. PMID 13130417doi:10.1086/378125
  12. Herrick JA, Lederman RJ, Sullivan B, et al. Brucella arteritis: clinical manifestations, treatment, and prognosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2014; 14:520.
  13. Ariza J, Bosilkovski M, Cascio A, Colmenero JD, Corbel MJ, Falagas ME; et al. (2007). "Perspectives for the treatment of brucellosis in the 21st century: the Ioannina recommendations". PLoS Med. 4 (12): e317. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040317. PMC 2222927. PMID 18162038.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Pappas G, Akritidis N, Bosilkovski M, Tsianos E (2005). "Brucellosis". N Engl J Med. 352 (22): 2325–36. doi:10.1056/NEJMra050570. PMID 15930423.
  15. Brucellosis. CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/brucellosis/transmission/index.html. Accessed on February 1, 2016
  16. Brucellosis. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brucellosis. Accessed on January 29, 2016
  17. Brucelosis. Wikipedia. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brucelosis. Accessed on February 2, 2016
  18. 18.00 18.01 18.02 18.03 18.04 18.05 18.06 18.07 18.08 18.09 18.10 18.11 "Public Health Image Library (PHIL)".

Template:WH Template:WS