Phimosis epidemiology and demographics: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ {{Phimosis}} Please help WikiDoc by adding more content here. It's easy! Click here to learn about editing. {{SCC}} ==Epidemiology a...")
 
m (Bot: Removing from Primary care)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
==Epidemiology and Demographics==
==Epidemiology and Demographics==
===Incidence===
===Incidence===
A number of medical reports of phimosis incidence have been published over the years. They vary widely because of the difficulties of distinguishing physiological phimosis (developmental nonretractility) from pathological phimosis, definitional differences, ascertainment problems, and the multiple additional influences on post-neonatal circumcision rates in cultures where most newborn males are circumcised.  A commonly cited incidence statistic for pathological phimosis is 1% of uncircumcised males.<ref name="Cantu" /><ref name="Shankar1999" /><sup>,</sup><ref name="Spilsbury2003" /> When phimosis is simply equated with nonretractility of the foreskin after age 3 years, considerably higher incidence rates have been reported.<ref name="Imamaura1997">Imamura E. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=97462004 Phimosis of infants and young children in Japan] Acta Paediatr Jpn 39:403-5, 1997. A study of phimosis prevalence in over 4,500 Japanese children reporting that over a third of uncircumcised had a nonretractile foreskin by age 3 years.
A number of medical reports of phimosis incidence have been published over the years. They vary widely because of the difficulties of distinguishing physiological phimosis (developmental nonretractility) from pathological phimosis, definitional differences, ascertainment problems, and the multiple additional influences on post-neonatal circumcision rates in cultures where most newborn males are circumcised.  A commonly cited incidence statistic for pathological phimosis is 1% of uncircumcised males. When phimosis is simply equated with nonretractility of the foreskin after age 3 years, considerably higher incidence rates have been reported.<ref name="Imamaura1997">Imamura E. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=97462004 Phimosis of infants and young children in Japan] Acta Paediatr Jpn 39:403-5, 1997. A study of phimosis prevalence in over 4,500 Japanese children reporting that over a third of uncircumcised had a nonretractile foreskin by age 3 years.
</ref><ref name="Oster1968">Øster J. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=68197098 Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys] Arch Dis Child 43(228):200-3,1968</ref>
</ref><ref name="Oster1968">Øster J. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=68197098 Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys] Arch Dis Child 43(228):200-3,1968</ref>
Others have described incidences in adolescents and adults as high as 50%, though it is likely that many cases of physiological phimosis or partial nonretractility were included.<ref name="Ohjimi1981">Ohjimi T, Ohjimi H. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=7240535Special surgical techniques for relief of phimosis] J Dermatol Surg Oncol 7:326-30, 1981. Almost half of Japanese adolescent and adult men suffer from some degree of phimosis.</ref>
Others have described incidences in adolescents and adults as high as 50%, though it is likely that many cases of physiological phimosis or partial nonretractility were included.<ref name="Ohjimi1981">Ohjimi T, Ohjimi H. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=7240535Special surgical techniques for relief of phimosis] J Dermatol Surg Oncol 7:326-30, 1981. Almost half of Japanese adolescent and adult men suffer from some degree of phimosis.</ref>
Line 12: Line 12:
==References==
==References==
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}}
{{WikiDoc Sources}}
[[Category:Andrology]]
[[Category:Andrology]]
[[Category:Needs content]]
[[Category:Needs content]]
Line 17: Line 20:
[[Category:Penis]]
[[Category:Penis]]
[[Category:Urology]]
[[Category:Urology]]
[[Category:Primary care]]
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}}
{{WikiDoc Sources}}

Latest revision as of 23:42, 29 July 2020

Phimosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Phimosis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Phimosis epidemiology and demographics On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Phimosis epidemiology and demographics

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Phimosis epidemiology and demographics

CDC onPhimosis epidemiology and demographics

Phimosis epidemiology and demographics in the news

Blogs on Phimosis epidemiology and demographics

Directions to Hospitals Treating Phimosis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Phimosis epidemiology and demographics

Please help WikiDoc by adding more content here. It's easy! Click here to learn about editing.

Steven C. Campbell, M.D., Ph.D.

Epidemiology and Demographics

Incidence

A number of medical reports of phimosis incidence have been published over the years. They vary widely because of the difficulties of distinguishing physiological phimosis (developmental nonretractility) from pathological phimosis, definitional differences, ascertainment problems, and the multiple additional influences on post-neonatal circumcision rates in cultures where most newborn males are circumcised. A commonly cited incidence statistic for pathological phimosis is 1% of uncircumcised males. When phimosis is simply equated with nonretractility of the foreskin after age 3 years, considerably higher incidence rates have been reported.[1][2] Others have described incidences in adolescents and adults as high as 50%, though it is likely that many cases of physiological phimosis or partial nonretractility were included.[3]

References

  1. Imamura E. Phimosis of infants and young children in Japan Acta Paediatr Jpn 39:403-5, 1997. A study of phimosis prevalence in over 4,500 Japanese children reporting that over a third of uncircumcised had a nonretractile foreskin by age 3 years.
  2. Øster J. Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys Arch Dis Child 43(228):200-3,1968
  3. Ohjimi T, Ohjimi H. surgical techniques for relief of phimosis J Dermatol Surg Oncol 7:326-30, 1981. Almost half of Japanese adolescent and adult men suffer from some degree of phimosis.

Template:WikiDoc Sources