Wells score for PE (modified): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (Bot: Removing from Primary care) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{CMG}} {{AE}}{{SSH}} | {{CMG}} {{AE}}{{SSH}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
== Modified Wells Score Calculator for PE == | == Modified Wells Score Calculator for PE == | ||
This handy calculator computes the pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism using modified Wells criteria. | This handy calculator computes the pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism using modified Wells criteria. | ||
| Line 21: | Line 20: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
[[Category:Medicine]] | [[Category:Medicine]] | ||
[[Category:Cardiology]] | [[Category:Cardiology]] | ||
[[Category:Hematology]] | [[Category:Hematology]] | ||
[[Category:Up-To-Date]] | [[Category:Up-To-Date]] | ||
[[Category:Calculator]] | [[Category:Calculator]] | ||
Latest revision as of 00:43, 30 July 2020
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sadaf Sharfaei M.D.[2]
Overview
Modified Wells Score Calculator for PE
This handy calculator computes the pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism using modified Wells criteria.
Check all boxes that apply to your patient:
Interpretation
Shown below is the pretest probability of PE according to modified Wells criteria:[1][2]
- Score ≤4: PE unlikely (Rate of PE: ~7.8%)
- Score >4: PE likely (Rate of PE: ~40.7%)
See also
- Wells score for DVT (original)
- Wells score for DVT (modified)
- Wells score for PE (original)
- Deep vein thrombosis assessment of clinical probability and risk scores
- Pulmonary embolism assessment of clinical probability and risk scores
References
- ↑ Stein PD, Woodard PK, Weg JG, Wakefield TW, Tapson VF, Sostman HD, Sos TA, Quinn DA, Leeper KV, Hull RD, Hales CA, Gottschalk A, Goodman LR, Fowler SE, Buckley JD (2007). "Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II Investigators". Radiology. 242 (1): 15–21. doi:10.1148/radiol.2421060971. PMID 17185658.
- ↑ van Belle A, Büller HR, Huisman MV, Huisman PM, Kaasjager K, Kamphuisen PW; et al. (2006). "Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography". JAMA. 295 (2): 172–9. doi:10.1001/jama.295.2.172. PMID 16403929.