Asherman's syndrome causes: Difference between revisions
(→Causes) |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{Asherman's syndrome}} | {{Asherman's syndrome}} | ||
'''Editor(s)-in-Chief:''' | '''Editor(s)-in-Chief:''' {{CMG}}; [[User:Csinfor|Canan S Fornusek, Ph.D.]]; '''Associate Editor-In-Chief:''' {{skhan}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Asherman's syndrome is most commonly linked to obstetric procedures that cause abrasion of the basal layer of the endometrium. Other causes include caesarian sections, infections or pelvic radiation therapy. | Asherman's syndrome is most commonly linked to obstetric procedures that cause [[abrasion]] of the basal layer of the [[endometrium]]. Other causes include [[Caesarean section|caesarian]] sections, infections or pelvic [[radiation therapy]]. | ||
Intrauterine | [[Intrauterine device]]<nowiki/>s have not been linked to Asherman's syndrome. | ||
==Causes== | ==Causes== | ||
Asherman's syndrome occurs most frequently after a Dilation & Curettage is performed on a recently pregnant uterus, following a missed or incomplete miscarriage, birth, or elective termination ([[abortion]]) to remove retained products of conception/placental remains. As the same procedure is used in all three situations, Asherman's can result in all of the above circumstances. It affects women of all races and ages as there is no underlying predisposition or genetic basis to its development. According to a study on 1900 patients with Asherman’s syndrome, over 90% of the cases occurred following pregnancy-related curettage <ref name="Schenker">{{cite journal |author=Schenker JG, Margalioth EJ. |title=Intra-uterine adhesions: an updated appraisal |journal=Fertility Sterility |volume=37 |issue=5 |pages=593–610. |year=1982 |pmid=6281085 | Asherman's syndrome occurs most frequently after a [[D&C|Dilation & Curettage]] (D&C) is performed on a recently pregnant uterus, following a missed or incomplete [[miscarriage]], birth, or elective termination ([[abortion]]) to remove [[retained products of conception]]/placental remains. As the same procedure is used in all three situations, Asherman's can result in all of the above circumstances. It affects women of all races and ages as there is no underlying predisposition or genetic basis to its development. According to a study on 1900 patients with Asherman’s syndrome, over 90% of the cases occurred following pregnancy-related [[curettage]] <ref name="Schenker">{{cite journal |author=Schenker JG, Margalioth EJ. |title=Intra-uterine adhesions: an updated appraisal |journal=Fertility Sterility |volume=37 |issue=5 |pages=593–610. |year=1982 |pmid=6281085 | ||
|doi=}}</ref>. | |doi=}}</ref>. | ||
It is estimated that up to 5% of D&Cs result in Asherman's. More conservative estimates put this rate at 1%. Asherman's results from 25% of D&Cs performed 1-4 weeks post-partum <ref>Parent B, Barbot J, Dubuisson JB. Uterine synechiae (in French). Encyl Med Chir Gynecol 1988; 140A (Suppl): 10-12.</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Rochet Y, Dargent D, Bremond A, Priou G, Rudigoz RC |title=The obstetrical outcome of women with surgically treated uterine synechiae (in French) |journal=J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod |volume=8 |issue=8 |pages=723–726. |year=1979 |pmid=553931 |doi=}}</ref><ref name="Buttram">{{cite journal |author=Buttram UC, Turati G. |title=Uterine synechiae: variation in severity and some conditions which may be conductive to severe adhesions |journal=Int J Fertil |volume=22 |issue=2 |pages=98–103. |year=1977 |pmid=20418 |doi=}}</ref>, 30.9% of D&Cs performed for missed miscarriages and 6.4% of D&Cs performed for incomplete miscarriages. <ref name="Adoni">{{cite journal |author=Adoni A, Palti Z, Milwidsky A, Dolberg M. |title=The incidence of intrauterine adhesions following spontaneous abortion |journal=Int J Fertil. |volume=27 |issue=2 |pages=117–118. |year=1982 |pmid=6126446 | It is estimated that up to 5% of D&Cs result in Asherman's. More conservative estimates put this rate at 1%. Asherman's results from 25% of D&Cs performed 1-4 weeks post-partum <ref>Parent B, Barbot J, Dubuisson JB. Uterine synechiae (in French). Encyl Med Chir Gynecol 1988; 140A (Suppl): 10-12.</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author=Rochet Y, Dargent D, Bremond A, Priou G, Rudigoz RC |title=The obstetrical outcome of women with surgically treated uterine synechiae (in French) |journal=J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod |volume=8 |issue=8 |pages=723–726. |year=1979 |pmid=553931 |doi=}}</ref><ref name="Buttram">{{cite journal |author=Buttram UC, Turati G. |title=Uterine synechiae: variation in severity and some conditions which may be conductive to severe adhesions |journal=Int J Fertil |volume=22 |issue=2 |pages=98–103. |year=1977 |pmid=20418 |doi=}}</ref>, 30.9% of D&Cs performed for missed miscarriages and 6.4% of D&Cs performed for incomplete miscarriages. <ref name="Adoni">{{cite journal |author=Adoni A, Palti Z, Milwidsky A, Dolberg M. |title=The incidence of intrauterine adhesions following spontaneous abortion |journal=Int J Fertil. |volume=27 |issue=2 |pages=117–118. |year=1982 |pmid=6126446 | ||
|doi=}}</ref> In the case of missed miscarriages, the time period between fetal demise and curettage increases the likelihood of adhesion formation to over 30.9% <ref name="Schenker">{{cite journal |author=Schenker JG, Margalioth EJ. |title=Intra-uterine adhesions: an updated appraisal |journal=Fertility Sterility |volume=37 |issue=5 |pages=593–610. |year=1982 |pmid=6281085 | |doi=}}</ref> In the case of missed [[Miscarriage|miscarriages]], the time period between fetal demise and curettage increases the likelihood of adhesion formation to over 30.9% <ref name="Schenker">{{cite journal |author=Schenker JG, Margalioth EJ. |title=Intra-uterine adhesions: an updated appraisal |journal=Fertility Sterility |volume=37 |issue=5 |pages=593–610. |year=1982 |pmid=6281085 | ||
|doi=}}</ref><ref>Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G. Septums and synechiae: approaches to surgical correction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49:767-788.</ref> | |doi=}}</ref><ref>Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G. Septums and synechiae: approaches to surgical correction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49:767-788.</ref> | ||
Latest revision as of 17:32, 4 September 2022
|
Asherman's syndrome Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Asherman's syndrome causes On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Asherman's syndrome causes |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Asherman's syndrome causes |
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Canan S Fornusek, Ph.D.; Associate Editor-In-Chief: Saud Khan M.D.
Overview
Asherman's syndrome is most commonly linked to obstetric procedures that cause abrasion of the basal layer of the endometrium. Other causes include caesarian sections, infections or pelvic radiation therapy.
Intrauterine devices have not been linked to Asherman's syndrome.
Causes
Asherman's syndrome occurs most frequently after a Dilation & Curettage (D&C) is performed on a recently pregnant uterus, following a missed or incomplete miscarriage, birth, or elective termination (abortion) to remove retained products of conception/placental remains. As the same procedure is used in all three situations, Asherman's can result in all of the above circumstances. It affects women of all races and ages as there is no underlying predisposition or genetic basis to its development. According to a study on 1900 patients with Asherman’s syndrome, over 90% of the cases occurred following pregnancy-related curettage [1].
It is estimated that up to 5% of D&Cs result in Asherman's. More conservative estimates put this rate at 1%. Asherman's results from 25% of D&Cs performed 1-4 weeks post-partum [2][3][4], 30.9% of D&Cs performed for missed miscarriages and 6.4% of D&Cs performed for incomplete miscarriages. [5] In the case of missed miscarriages, the time period between fetal demise and curettage increases the likelihood of adhesion formation to over 30.9% [1][6]
Asherman's can also result from other pelvic surgeries including Cesarean section[7], removal of fibroid tumours (myomectomy) and from other causes such as IUDs, pelvic irradiation, schistosomiasis[8] and genital tuberculosis[9]. Chronic endometritis from genital tuberculosis is a significant cause of severe IUA in the developing world, often resulting in total obliteration of the uterine cavity which is difficult to treat [10].
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Schenker JG, Margalioth EJ. (1982). "Intra-uterine adhesions: an updated appraisal". Fertility Sterility. 37 (5): 593–610. PMID 6281085.
- ↑ Parent B, Barbot J, Dubuisson JB. Uterine synechiae (in French). Encyl Med Chir Gynecol 1988; 140A (Suppl): 10-12.
- ↑ Rochet Y, Dargent D, Bremond A, Priou G, Rudigoz RC (1979). "The obstetrical outcome of women with surgically treated uterine synechiae (in French)". J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 8 (8): 723–726. PMID 553931.
- ↑ Buttram UC, Turati G. (1977). "Uterine synechiae: variation in severity and some conditions which may be conductive to severe adhesions". Int J Fertil. 22 (2): 98–103. PMID 20418.
- ↑ Adoni A, Palti Z, Milwidsky A, Dolberg M. (1982). "The incidence of intrauterine adhesions following spontaneous abortion". Int J Fertil. 27 (2): 117–118. PMID 6126446.
- ↑ Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G. Septums and synechiae: approaches to surgical correction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49:767-788.
- ↑ Rochet Y, Dargent D, Bremond A, Priou G, Rudigoz RC (1979). "The obstetrical outcome of women with surgically treated uterine synechiae (in French)". J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 8 (8): 723–726. PMID 553931.
- ↑ Krolikowski A, Janowski K, Larsen JV. (1995). "Asherman syndrome caused by schistosomiasis". Obstet Gynecol. 85 (5Pt2): 898–9. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(94)00371-J. PMID 7724154.
- ↑ Netter AP, Musset R, Lambert A Salomon Y (1956). "Traumatic uterine synechiae: a common cause of menstrual insufficiency, sterility, and abortion". Am J Obstet Gynecol. 71 (2): 368–75. PMID 13283012.
- ↑ Bukulmez O, Yarali H, Gurgan T. (1999). "Total corporal synechiae due to tuberculosis carry a very poor prognosis following hysteroscopic synechialysis". Hum Reprod. 14 (8): 1960–1961. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.8.1960. PMID 10438408.