Asherman's syndrome other diagnostic studies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{CMG}} '''Associate Editor-In-Chief: {{Skhan}}''' | {{CMG}} '''Associate Editor-In-Chief: {{Skhan}}''' | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Hysteroscopy remains the gold standard. MRI | Hysteroscopy remains the gold standard. There is currently no role for MRI in diagnosis of Intra Uterine Adhesions. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} |
Latest revision as of 17:44, 4 September 2022
Asherman's syndrome Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Asherman's syndrome other diagnostic studies On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Asherman's syndrome other diagnostic studies |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Asherman's syndrome other diagnostic studies |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor-In-Chief: Saud Khan M.D.
Overview
Hysteroscopy remains the gold standard. There is currently no role for MRI in diagnosis of Intra Uterine Adhesions.