Left ventriculogram quality grades: Difference between revisions

	WikiDoc Resources for Left ventriculogram quality grades
Articles
Most recent articles on Left ventriculogram quality grades Most cited articles on Left ventriculogram quality grades Review articles on Left ventriculogram quality grades Articles on Left ventriculogram quality grades in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ
Media
Powerpoint slides on Left ventriculogram quality grades Images of Left ventriculogram quality grades Photos of Left ventriculogram quality grades Podcasts & MP3s on Left ventriculogram quality grades Videos on Left ventriculogram quality grades
Evidence Based Medicine
Cochrane Collaboration on Left ventriculogram quality grades Bandolier on Left ventriculogram quality grades TRIP on Left ventriculogram quality grades
Clinical Trials
Ongoing Trials on Left ventriculogram quality grades at Clinical Trials.gov Trial results on Left ventriculogram quality grades Clinical Trials on Left ventriculogram quality grades at Google
Guidelines / Policies / Govt
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Left ventriculogram quality grades NICE Guidance on Left ventriculogram quality grades NHS PRODIGY Guidance FDA on Left ventriculogram quality grades CDC on Left ventriculogram quality grades
Books
Books on Left ventriculogram quality grades
News
Left ventriculogram quality grades in the news Be alerted to news on Left ventriculogram quality grades News trends on Left ventriculogram quality grades
Commentary
Blogs on Left ventriculogram quality grades
Definitions
Definitions of Left ventriculogram quality grades
Patient Resources / Community
Patient resources on Left ventriculogram quality grades Discussion groups on Left ventriculogram quality grades Patient Handouts on Left ventriculogram quality grades Directions to Hospitals Treating Left ventriculogram quality grades Risk calculators and risk factors for Left ventriculogram quality grades
Healthcare Provider Resources
Symptoms of Left ventriculogram quality grades Causes & Risk Factors for Left ventriculogram quality grades Diagnostic studies for Left ventriculogram quality grades Treatment of Left ventriculogram quality grades
Continuing Medical Education (CME)
CME Programs on Left ventriculogram quality grades
International
Left ventriculogram quality grades en Espanol Left ventriculogram quality grades en Francais
Business
Left ventriculogram quality grades in the Marketplace Patents on Left ventriculogram quality grades
Experimental / Informatics
List of terms related to Left ventriculogram quality grades

VisualWikitext

Latest revision as of 23:35, 23 August 2013

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hardik Patel, M.D.

Synonyms and keywords: Left ventriculogram quality; LV gram quality; LV gram quality grades

Left Ventriculogram Quality Grades

Following are the explanations for the different grades of LV gram quality:

Uninterpretable

LV gram quality is uninterpretable, if it is impossible to analyze heart-beat type, ventricular wall motion, mitral valve regurgitation, and left ventricular ejection fraction because of insufficient filling of the LV cavity, poor panning, and short film duration. So all the fields for analysis are marked as CNA (can not assess).

Poor

LV gram quality is poor, if it is difficult to analyze heart-beat type, ventricular wall motion, and mitral valve regurgitation and impossible to analyze left ventricular ejection fraction because of poor panning and short film duration. So only ejection fraction is marked as CNA (can not assess).

Fair

LV gram quality is fair, if it is difficult to analyze heart-beat type, ventricular wall motion, mitral valve regurgitation, and left ventricular ejection fraction with proper panning and enough film duration which covers at least three heart-beats. So nothing is marked as CNA (can not assess).

Good

LV gram quality is good, if it is easy to analyze heart-beat type, ventricular wall motion, mitral valve regurgitation, and left ventricular ejection fraction with good filling of the LV cavity, proper panning, and enough film duration which covers at least three heart-beats. So nothing is marked as CNA (can not assess).

Excellent

LV gram quality is excellent, if it is very easy to analyze heart-beat type, ventricular wall motion, mitral valve regurgitation, and left ventricular ejection fraction with perfect filling of the LV cavity, proper panning, and enough film duration which covers at least three heart-beats. So nothing is marked as CNA (can not assess).

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 {{SI}}
 {{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{HP}}
+{{SK}} Left ventriculogram quality; LV gram quality; LV gram quality grades
 ==Left Ventriculogram Quality Grades==
@@ Line 7: / Line 9: @@
 ===Uninterpretable===
-LV gram quality is uninterpretable if it is impossible to analyze beat-type, ventricular wall motion, mitral valve regurgitation, and left ventricular ejection fraction because of insufficient filling of the LV cavity, poor panning, and short film duration. So all the fields for analysis are marked as CNA.
+[[Left ventriculography|LV gram]] quality is uninterpretable, if it is impossible to analyze heart-beat type, ventricular wall motion, [[mitral valve regurgitation]], and [[left ventricular ejection fraction]] because of insufficient filling of the [[LV]] cavity, poor panning, and short film duration.  So all the fields for analysis are marked as CNA (can not assess).
 ===Poor===
-LV gram quality is poor if it is difficult to analyze beat-type, ventricular wall motion, and mitral valve regurgitation and impossible to analyze left ventricular ejection fraction because of poor panning and short film duration. So only ejection fraction is marked as CNA.
+[[Left ventriculography|LV gram]] quality is poor, if it is difficult to analyze heart-beat type, ventricular wall motion, and [[mitral valve regurgitation]] and impossible to analyze [[left ventricular ejection fraction]] because of poor panning and short film duration.  So only [[ejection fraction]] is marked as CNA (can not assess).
 ===Fair===
-LV gram quality is fair if it is difficult to analyze beat-type, ventricular wall motion, mitral valve regurgitation, and left ventricular ejection fraction with proper panning and enough film duration which covers at least three heart beats. So nothing is marked as CNA.
+[[Left ventriculography|LV gram]] quality is fair, if it is difficult to analyze heart-beat type, ventricular wall motion, [[mitral valve regurgitation]], and [[left ventricular ejection fraction]] with proper panning and enough film duration which covers at least three heart-beats.  So nothing is marked as CNA (can not assess).
 ===Good===
-LV gram quality is good if it is easy to analyze beat-type, ventricular wall motion, mitral valve regurgitation, and left ventricular ejection fraction with good filling of the LV cavity, proper panning, and enough film duration which covers at least three heart beats. So nothing is marked as CNA.
+[[Left ventriculography|LV gram]] quality is good, if it is easy to analyze heart-beat type, ventricular wall motion, [[mitral valve regurgitation]], and [[left ventricular ejection fraction]] with good filling of the [[LV]] cavity, proper panning, and enough film duration which covers at least three heart-beats.  So nothing is marked as CNA (can not assess).
 ===Excellent===
-LV gram quality is excellent if it is very easy to analyze beat-type, ventricular wall motion, mitral valve regurgitation, and left ventricular ejection fraction with perfect filling of the LV cavity, proper panning, and enough film duration which covers at least three heart beats. So nothing is marked as CNA.
+[[Left ventriculography|LV gram]] quality is excellent, if it is very easy to analyze heart-beat type, ventricular wall motion, [[mitral valve regurgitation]], and [[left ventricular ejection fraction]] with perfect filling of the [[LV]] cavity, proper panning, and enough film duration which covers at least three heart-beats.  So nothing is marked as CNA (can not assess).
 [[Category:Cardiology]]
 [[Category:Angiopedia]]