Trigeminal neuralgia other imaging findings: Difference between revisions
Kiran Singh (talk | contribs) |
m (Bot: Removing from Primary care) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Trigeminal neuralgia}} | {{Trigeminal neuralgia}} | ||
MRI/MRA are the main imaging modalities used to distinguish between classic, secondary and idiopathic forms of trigeminal neuralgia. Some other tests performed include: | |||
== Histology == | |||
Although not a diagnostic test histology reveals focal [[demyelination]] as the ultimate lesion in all cases of trigeminal neuralgia.<ref name="urlTrigeminal Neuralgia Workup: Approach Considerations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Angiography">{{cite web |url=https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1145144-workup?pa=GDmJM7UX%2BuuGPH9fJK9a%2F4Mq6un1WAyPdDn2KlKlB8Fp27sPlr12Q51yfCRGpwZ%2BX8MwC0EECwzp432Skuf9qw%3D%3D#c9 |title=Trigeminal Neuralgia Workup: Approach Considerations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Angiography |format= |work= |accessdate=}}</ref> | |||
== Clinical Neurophysiology testing == | |||
Clinical neurophysiology testing with a blink reflex study may be helpful to demonstrate a lesion of the trigeminus in which a bilateral delay occurs in response to the stimulation on the pathologic side. The blink reflex can clearly help to distinguish [[idiopathic]] form of trigeminal neuralgia from other causes. The [[Sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] of this test across studies has been reported as 59-100%, and the [[Specificity (tests)|specificity]] has been noted as 93-100%.<ref name="urlTrigeminal Neuralgia Workup: Approach Considerations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Angiography">{{cite web |url=https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1145144-workup?pa=GDmJM7UX%2BuuGPH9fJK9a%2F4Mq6un1WAyPdDn2KlKlB8Fp27sPlr12Q51yfCRGpwZ%2BX8MwC0EECwzp432Skuf9qw%3D%3D#c9 |title=Trigeminal Neuralgia Workup: Approach Considerations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Angiography |format= |work= |accessdate=}}</ref><ref>Cruccu G, Biasiotta A, Galeotti F, Iannetti GD, Truini A, Gronseth G. Diagnostic accuracy of trigeminal reflex testing in trigeminal neuralgia. Neurology. 2006 Jan 10. 66(1):139-41</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
{{WH}} | |||
{{WS}} | |||
[[Category:Needs content]] | [[Category:Needs content]] | ||
[[Category:Neurosurgery]] | [[Category:Neurosurgery]] | ||
[[Category:Pain]] | [[Category:Pain]] | ||
Line 14: | Line 21: | ||
[[Category:Rare diseases]] | [[Category:Rare diseases]] | ||
[[Category:Neurology]] | [[Category:Neurology]] | ||
Latest revision as of 00:29, 30 July 2020
Trigeminal neuralgia Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Trigeminal neuralgia other imaging findings On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Trigeminal neuralgia other imaging findings |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Trigeminal neuralgia other imaging findings |
MRI/MRA are the main imaging modalities used to distinguish between classic, secondary and idiopathic forms of trigeminal neuralgia. Some other tests performed include:
Histology
Although not a diagnostic test histology reveals focal demyelination as the ultimate lesion in all cases of trigeminal neuralgia.[1]
Clinical Neurophysiology testing
Clinical neurophysiology testing with a blink reflex study may be helpful to demonstrate a lesion of the trigeminus in which a bilateral delay occurs in response to the stimulation on the pathologic side. The blink reflex can clearly help to distinguish idiopathic form of trigeminal neuralgia from other causes. The sensitivity of this test across studies has been reported as 59-100%, and the specificity has been noted as 93-100%.[1][2]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 "Trigeminal Neuralgia Workup: Approach Considerations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Angiography".
- ↑ Cruccu G, Biasiotta A, Galeotti F, Iannetti GD, Truini A, Gronseth G. Diagnostic accuracy of trigeminal reflex testing in trigeminal neuralgia. Neurology. 2006 Jan 10. 66(1):139-41