Linitis plastica other diagnostic studies: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{Linitis plastica}} | {{Linitis plastica}} | ||
{{CMG}};{{AE}}{{HM}} | |||
==Overview== | |||
Brush cytology may be helpful in the diagnosis of linitis plastica and its complications. Brush cytology has the ability to increase the [[Sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] of even a single [[biopsy]] carried out by [[endoscopic ultrasound]]. If bleeding is a concern in the patient, brush cytology is able to take samples of the [[Mucous membrane|mucosa]] without causing bleeds. [[Immunohistochemistry|Immunohistochemical staining]] then confirms the diagnosis of linitis plastica by the detection of [[Signet cell|signet ring cells]]. Peritoneal cytology can also be useful in those that are negative for [[metastasis]] elsewhere. | |||
==Other Diagnostic Studies== | |||
===Brush cytology=== | |||
*Brush cytology with [[Immunohistochemistry|immunohistochemical staining]] may be helpful in the diagnosis of linitis plastica.<ref name="pmid2028694">{{cite journal |vauthors=Wang HH, Jonasson JG, Ducatman BS |title=Brushing cytology of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Obsolete or not? |journal=Acta Cytol. |volume=35 |issue=2 |pages=195–8 |year=1991 |pmid=2028694 |doi= |url=}}</ref> | |||
*Brush cytology has the following advantages: | |||
**No risk of bleeding | |||
**Increased [[Sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] of single biopsy | |||
**Sensitive to poorly differentiated linits plastica | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
| Line 10: | Line 19: | ||
[[Category:Types of cancer]] | [[Category:Types of cancer]] | ||
[[Category:Gastroenterology]] | [[Category:Gastroenterology]] | ||
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}} | {{WikiDoc Help Menu}} | ||
{{WikiDoc Sources}} | {{WikiDoc Sources}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:08, 16 January 2018
|
Linitis plastica Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Linitis plastica other diagnostic studies On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Linitis plastica other diagnostic studies |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Linitis plastica other diagnostic studies |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1];Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Hadeel Maksoud M.D.[2]
Overview
Brush cytology may be helpful in the diagnosis of linitis plastica and its complications. Brush cytology has the ability to increase the sensitivity of even a single biopsy carried out by endoscopic ultrasound. If bleeding is a concern in the patient, brush cytology is able to take samples of the mucosa without causing bleeds. Immunohistochemical staining then confirms the diagnosis of linitis plastica by the detection of signet ring cells. Peritoneal cytology can also be useful in those that are negative for metastasis elsewhere.
Other Diagnostic Studies
Brush cytology
- Brush cytology with immunohistochemical staining may be helpful in the diagnosis of linitis plastica.[1]
- Brush cytology has the following advantages:
- No risk of bleeding
- Increased sensitivity of single biopsy
- Sensitive to poorly differentiated linits plastica