Peritonitis echocardiography or ultrasound: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m Formatting |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{Peritonitis}} | {{Peritonitis}} | ||
{{CMG}} | {{CMG}} {{AE}} {{SCh}} | ||
{{ | |||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
==Ultrasound== | ==Ultrasound== | ||
* Abdominal ultrasonography may be helpful in the evaluation of pathology in the right upper quadrant (eg, perihepatic abscess, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, pancreatic pseudocyst), right lower quadrant, and pelvis (eg, appendicitis, tubo-ovarian abscess, Douglas pouch abscess). | |||
* However, the examination is sometimes limited because of patient discomfort, abdominal distention, and bowel gas interference. | |||
* Ultrasonography may detect increased amounts of peritoneal fluid (ascites), but its ability to detect quantities of less than 100 mL is limited. | |||
* A diagnostic accuracy of greater than 85% has been reported in several series. | |||
* Ultrasonographically guided aspiration and placement of drains has evolved into a valuable tool in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal fluid collections. | |||
* Advantages of ultrasound include low cost, portability, and availability. | |||
* Disadvantages are that the test is operator dependent, and there is reduced visualization in the presence of overlying bowel gas and abdominal dressings. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
{{WS}} | {{WS}} | ||
{{WH}} | {{WH}} |
Latest revision as of 15:59, 30 January 2017
Peritonitis Main Page |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shivani Chaparala M.B.B.S [2]
Overview
Ultrasound
- Abdominal ultrasonography may be helpful in the evaluation of pathology in the right upper quadrant (eg, perihepatic abscess, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, pancreatic pseudocyst), right lower quadrant, and pelvis (eg, appendicitis, tubo-ovarian abscess, Douglas pouch abscess).
- However, the examination is sometimes limited because of patient discomfort, abdominal distention, and bowel gas interference.
- Ultrasonography may detect increased amounts of peritoneal fluid (ascites), but its ability to detect quantities of less than 100 mL is limited.
- A diagnostic accuracy of greater than 85% has been reported in several series.
- Ultrasonographically guided aspiration and placement of drains has evolved into a valuable tool in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal fluid collections.
- Advantages of ultrasound include low cost, portability, and availability.
- Disadvantages are that the test is operator dependent, and there is reduced visualization in the presence of overlying bowel gas and abdominal dressings.