Sandbox:lipid: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
{{familytree/end}} | {{familytree/end}} | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
! colspan=" | ! colspan="4" |TAVR CT Measurement Summary | ||
|- | |||
! colspan="4" |Valve Size and Type | |||
|- | |- | ||
!Region of Interest | !Region of Interest | ||
! | !Specific | ||
Measurements | |||
!Additional Comments | !Measurement Technique | ||
!Additional | |||
Comments | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Aortic valve morphology | |Aortic valve morphology | ||
| | and function | ||
|Aortic valve | |||
| | | | ||
* | * If cine images obtained, qualitative evaluation of valve opening | ||
* | * Planimetry of aortic valve area in rare cases | ||
* | * Calcium score with Agatston technique or a volumetric technique to quantify calcification of aortic valve | ||
|Most useful in cases of LFLG AS where diagnosis is otherwise | |||
unclear. May be helpful in defining number of valve cusps. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|LV | |LV geometry and other | ||
cardiac findings | cardiac findings | ||
| | |LV outflow tract | ||
* | | | ||
* Measured with a double oblique plane at narrowest portion of the LV outflow tract | |||
* | * Perimeter | ||
* | * Area | ||
* | * Qualitative assessment of calcification | ||
|Quantification of calcification not standardized. | |||
Large eccentric calcium may predispose for paravalvular | |||
regurgitation and annular rupture during valve deployment. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Annular sizing | |Annular sizing | ||
|Aortic annulus | |||
| | | | ||
* | * Defined as double oblique plane at insertion point of all 3 coronary cusps | ||
of | |||
* Major/minor | * Major/minor diameter | ||
* | * Perimeter | ||
* | * Area | ||
|Periprocedural TEE and/or balloon sizing can confirm | |||
dimensions during case. | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Aortic root measurements | |Aortic root measurements | ||
|Sinus of Valsalva | |||
| | | | ||
* | * Height from annulus to superior aspect of each coronary cusp | ||
* | * Diameter of each coronary cusp to the opposite commissure | ||
* | * Circumference around largest dimension | ||
* Area of the largest dimension | |||
* | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Coronary | | rowspan="2" |Coronary and thoracic | ||
anatomy | |||
|Coronary arteries | |||
| | | | ||
* | * Height from annulus to inferior margin of left main coronary artery and the inferior margin of the right coronary artery | ||
|Short coronary artery height increases risk of procedure. Evaluation of coronary artery and bypass graft stenosis on select studies. Estimate risk of coronary occlusion during valve deployment. | |||
|- | |||
|Aortic root | |||
angulation | |||
| | |||
* Angle of root to left ventricle | |||
* | * Three-cusp angulation to predict best fluoroscopy angle | ||
|Reduce procedure time and contrast load by reducing number of periprocedural root | |||
injections | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
! colspan="2" |TAVR Procedural Complications and Management | |||
|- | |||
!Complication | |||
!Treatment Options | |||
|- | |||
|Valve embolization | |||
* Aortic | |||
* Left ventricle | |||
| | |||
* Recapture or deploy in descending aorta if still attached to delivery system (self-expanding) | |||
* Valve-in-valve | |||
* Endovascular (snare) | |||
* SAVR and extraction | |||
|- | |||
|Central valvular aortic regurgitation | |||
| | |||
* Usually self-limited, but may require gentle probing of leaflets with a soft wire or catheter | |||
* Delivery of a second TAVR device | |||
|- | |||
|Paravalvular aortic regurgitation | |||
| | |||
* Post-deployment balloon dilation | |||
* Delivery of a second TAVR device Repositioning of valve if low (recapture, snare) | |||
* Percutaneous vascular closure devices (e.g., Amplatzer Vascular Plug) | |||
* SAVR | |||
|- | |||
|Shock or hemodynamic collapse | |||
| | | | ||
* Coronary | * Assess and treat underlying cause if feasible | ||
* Inotropic support | |||
* Mechanical circulatory support | |||
* CPB | |||
|- | |||
|Coronary occlusion | |||
| | |||
* PCI (easier if coronaries already wired before valve implantation) | |||
* CABG | |||
|- | |||
|Annular rupture | |||
| | |||
* Reverse anticoagulation | |||
* Surgical repair | |||
* Pericardial drainage | |||
|- | |||
|Ventricular perforation | |||
| | |||
* Reverse anticoagulation | |||
* Surgical repair | |||
* Pericardial drainage | |||
|- | |||
|Complete heart block | |||
|Transvenous pacing with conversion to PPM if needed | |||
|- | |||
|Stroke | |||
* Ischemic | |||
* | * Hemorrhagic | ||
| | |||
* | * Catheter-based, mechanical embolic retrieval for large ischemic CVA | ||
* Conservative | |||
* | |||
|- | |- | ||
| | |Bleeding/hemorrhage | ||
| | | | ||
* | * Treat source if feasible | ||
* Transfusion | |||
* | * Reversal of anticoagulation | ||
| | |- | ||
|Access site-related complications | |||
|Urgent endovascular or surgical repair | |||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 18:44, 16 January 2017
TAVR Imaging Evaluation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TAVR CT | ECHO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-gated Angigram of Chest, Abdomen and Pelvic arteries for vascular access selection | ECG gated CT of annulus and Aortic root for valve sizing selection | Left ventricles and other findings | Confirm severe Aortic Stenosis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfemoral Approach | Annular sizing | Aortic Root sizing | Additional Procedural Planning | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subclavian Approach | Major/Minor Dimension | Coronary Ostia height | Fluoroscopy Angulation | LVEF and LV dimension | High gradient AS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apical Approach | Area | Aortic Sinus to Commissure dimension | Bypass Grafts | Estimated Pulmonary pressure | Low gradient AS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Approaches | Circumferences | Sinotubular Junction | RV to Chest wall position | Other valvular abnormalities | Reduced EF | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carotid | Ascending Aorta dimension | Preserved EF | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Aortic | Aortic Calcification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transvenous | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TAVR CT Measurement Summary | |||
---|---|---|---|
Valve Size and Type | |||
Region of Interest | Specific
Measurements |
Measurement Technique | Additional
Comments |
Aortic valve morphology
and function |
Aortic valve |
|
Most useful in cases of LFLG AS where diagnosis is otherwise
unclear. May be helpful in defining number of valve cusps. |
LV geometry and other
cardiac findings |
LV outflow tract |
|
Quantification of calcification not standardized.
Large eccentric calcium may predispose for paravalvular regurgitation and annular rupture during valve deployment. |
Annular sizing | Aortic annulus |
|
Periprocedural TEE and/or balloon sizing can confirm
dimensions during case. |
Aortic root measurements | Sinus of Valsalva |
|
|
Coronary and thoracic
anatomy |
Coronary arteries |
|
Short coronary artery height increases risk of procedure.? Evaluation of coronary artery and bypass graft stenosis on select studies. Estimate risk of coronary occlusion during valve deployment. |
Aortic root
angulation |
|
Reduce procedure time and contrast load by reducing number of periprocedural root
injections |
TAVR Procedural Complications and Management | |
---|---|
Complication | Treatment Options |
Valve embolization
|
|
Central valvular aortic regurgitation |
|
Paravalvular aortic regurgitation |
|
Shock or hemodynamic collapse |
|
Coronary occlusion |
|
Annular rupture |
|
Ventricular perforation |
|
Complete heart block | Transvenous pacing with conversion to PPM if needed |
Stroke
|
|
Bleeding/hemorrhage |
|
Access site-related complications | Urgent endovascular or surgical repair |