Retinoblastoma screening: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Bot: Removing from Primary care) |
||
(31 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{Retinoblastoma}} | {{Retinoblastoma}} | ||
{{CMG}}{{AE}}{{Simrat}} | {{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{Sahar}} {{Simrat}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Early [[diagnosis]] of retinoblastoma is necessary to obtain the best outcomes for preservation of the [[vision]] and the eye. In 2018, a group of experts in clinical retinoblastoma care and [[ophthalmic]] | |||
[[pathology]] and [[genetics]] suggested a risk-stratified schedule for [[ophthalmic]] [[screening]] [[Examination|examinations]]. Estimated risk of retinoblastoma development is calculated according to the relativity of individuals to the family member with retinoblastoma. | |||
==Screening== | ==Screening== | ||
* | * In 2018, a group of experts in clinical retinoblastoma care and [[ophthalmic]] [[pathology]] and [[genetics]] suggested a risk-stratified schedule for [[ophthalmic]] [[Screening (medicine)|screening]] [[Examination|examinations]].<ref name="SkaletGombos2018">{{cite journal|last1=Skalet|first1=Alison H.|last2=Gombos|first2=Dan S.|last3=Gallie|first3=Brenda L.|last4=Kim|first4=Jonathan W.|last5=Shields|first5=Carol L.|last6=Marr|first6=Brian P.|last7=Plon|first7=Sharon E.|last8=Chévez-Barrios|first8=Patricia|title=Screening Children at Risk for Retinoblastoma|journal=Ophthalmology|volume=125|issue=3|year=2018|pages=453–458|issn=01616420|doi=10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.001}}</ref> | ||
*To schedule | * This panel of experts recommended that all [[Child|children]] with an elevated risk of retinoblastoma (above the population risk) should be [[Screening (medicine)|screened]] via regular [[Fundoscopy|fundoscopic examinations]]. | ||
*The table below is an estimate of patients risk for the development of retinoblastoma depending on the | *To schedule a [[screening]] plan, the risk of [[tumor]] development must be determined using the [[infant]] relationship to the family member with retinoblastoma. | ||
*The table below is an estimate of [[Patient|patients']] risk for the development of retinoblastoma depending on the relation of the [[patient]] to the affected individual: | |||
{| border="3" | {| border="3" | ||
|+ | |+ | ||
! Relative of patient !! Bilateral involvement (100%) !! Unilateral involvement (15%) | ! style="background: #4479BA; width: 150px;" | {{fontcolor|#FFF| Relative of patient}} !! style="background: #4479BA; width: 150px;" | {{fontcolor|#FFF| Bilateral involvement (100%)}} !! style="background: #4479BA; width: 150px;" | {{fontcolor|#FFF| Unilateral involvement (15%)}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Offspring (infant) | ! style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; " |Offspring (infant) | ||
| 50 || 7.5 | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" align="center" | 50 || style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" align="center" | 7.5 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Parent | ! style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; " | Parent | ||
|5 | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" align="center" |5 | ||
|0.8 | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" align="center" |0.8 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Sibling | ! style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; " | Sibling | ||
|2.5 | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" align="center" |2.5 | ||
|0.4 | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" align="center" |0.4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Niece/nephew | ! style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; " | Niece/nephew | ||
|1.3 | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" align="center" |1.3 | ||
|0.2 | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" align="center" |0.2 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Aunt/uncle | ! style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; " | Aunt/uncle | ||
|0.1 | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" align="center" |0.1 | ||
|0.007 | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" align="center" |0.007 | ||
|- | |- | ||
! First cousin | ! style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC; " | First cousin | ||
|0.05 | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" align="center" |0.05 | ||
|0.007 | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" align="center" |0.007 | ||
|} | |} | ||
{| | {| | ||
! colspan="2" style="background:#DCDCDC;" align="center" + |The table | ! colspan="2" style="background:#DCDCDC;" align="center" + |The above table adopted from Ophthalmology journal <ref name="SkaletGombos2018">{{cite journal|last1=Skalet|first1=Alison H.|last2=Gombos|first2=Dan S.|last3=Gallie|first3=Brenda L.|last4=Kim|first4=Jonathan W.|last5=Shields|first5=Carol L.|last6=Marr|first6=Brian P.|last7=Plon|first7=Sharon E.|last8=Chévez-Barrios|first8=Patricia|title=Screening Children at Risk for Retinoblastoma|journal=Ophthalmology|volume=125|issue=3|year=2018|pages=453–458|issn=01616420|doi=10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.001}}</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Next step in assessing the risk of these children is to estimate the approximate relative risk of | * Next step in assessing the risk of these [[Child|children]] is to estimate the approximate relative risk of retinoblastoma development according to the percentage mentioned in the above table. | ||
*Relatives are categorized into three categories: | *Relatives are categorized into three categories: | ||
**High risk: | **'''High risk:''' Those with a risk percentage > 7.5% | ||
**Intermediate risk: | **'''Intermediate risk:''' Those with a risk percentage between 1% and 7.5% (including 7.5%) | ||
**Low risk: | **'''Low risk:''' Those with a risk percentage < 1% | ||
The following table is the recommended | *American Association of [[Ophthalmic]] [[Oncologists]] and [[Pathologists]] (AAOOP) [[Medical guideline|guideline]] recommends scheduled [[eye examination]] for the [[screening]] of children at high risk of developing retinoblastoma. [[Screening (medicine)|Screening]] should be initiated at [[birth]] and continued till the age of 7 years.<ref name="SkaletGombos2018">{{cite journal|last1=Skalet|first1=Alison H.|last2=Gombos|first2=Dan S.|last3=Gallie|first3=Brenda L.|last4=Kim|first4=Jonathan W.|last5=Shields|first5=Carol L.|last6=Marr|first6=Brian P.|last7=Plon|first7=Sharon E.|last8=Chévez-Barrios|first8=Patricia|title=Screening Children at Risk for Retinoblastoma|journal=Ophthalmology|volume=125|issue=3|year=2018|pages=453–458|issn=01616420|doi=10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.001}}</ref> | ||
{| style="border: 0px; font-size: 90%; margin: 3px; width: 600px" align=center | *No further [[Eye examination|examination]] is required after the age of 7 years except for those who are known carriers of the [[RB1]] [[gene]] [[mutation]]. | ||
|valign=top| | *For those who are carries of the [[RB1]] [[gene]] [[mutation]], [[screening]] should be continued indefinitely after the age of 7 years and should be done annually or every 2 years. | ||
* The following table is the recommended [[eye examination]] schedule for unaffected [[Child|children]] of families with retinoblastoma depending on their age and risk percentage of [[tumor]] development: | |||
{| style="border: 0px; font-size: 90%; margin: 3px; width: 600px" align="center" | |||
| valign="top" | | |||
|+ | |+ | ||
! style="background: #4479BA; width: 200px;" | {{fontcolor|#FFF|Risk category or Age}} | ! style="background: #4479BA; width: 200px;" | {{fontcolor|#FFF|Risk category or Age}} | ||
Line 58: | Line 63: | ||
Birth to 8 weeks | Birth to 8 weeks | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | ||
*Every 2-4 weeks | *Every 2 - 4 weeks | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | ||
*Monthly | *Monthly | ||
Line 65: | Line 70: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | ||
>8-12 weeks | > 8 - 12 weeks | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | ||
*Monthly | *Monthly | ||
Line 74: | Line 79: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | ||
>3 | > 3 - 12 months | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | ||
*Monthly | *Monthly | ||
Line 83: | Line 88: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | ||
>12 | > 12 - 24 months | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | ||
*Every 2 months | *Every 2 months | ||
Line 92: | Line 97: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | ||
>24 | > 24 - 36 months | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | ||
*Every 3 months | *Every 3 months | ||
Line 101: | Line 106: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | ||
>36 | > 36 - 48 months | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | ||
*Every 4 months | *Every 4 months | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | ||
*Every 4-6 months | *Every 4 - 6 months | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | ||
*Every 6 months | *Every 6 months | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | ||
>48 | > 48 - 60 months | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | ||
*Every 6 months | *Every 6 months | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | ||
*Every 4-6 months | *Every 4 - 6 months | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | ||
*Annually | *Annually | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #DCDCDC;font-weight: bold" | | ||
5 | 5 - 7 years | ||
| style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | | style="padding: 5px 5px; background: #F5F5F5;" | | ||
*Every 6 months | *Every 6 months | ||
Line 127: | Line 132: | ||
*Annually | *Annually | ||
|} | |} | ||
{| | |||
! colspan="2" style="background:#DCDCDC;" align="center" + |This table is adopted from Ophthalmology journal<ref name="SkaletGombos2018">{{cite journal|last1=Skalet|first1=Alison H.|last2=Gombos|first2=Dan S.|last3=Gallie|first3=Brenda L.|last4=Kim|first4=Jonathan W.|last5=Shields|first5=Carol L.|last6=Marr|first6=Brian P.|last7=Plon|first7=Sharon E.|last8=Chévez-Barrios|first8=Patricia|title=Screening Children at Risk for Retinoblastoma|journal=Ophthalmology|volume=125|issue=3|year=2018|pages=453–458|issn=01616420|doi=10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.001}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|- | |||
|} | |} | ||
*The schedule presented above is general [[Medical guideline|guideline]] for at-risk [[Child|children]] when no [[Lesion|lesions]] of concern have been noted. Some [[Child|children]] may require more frequent [[Eye examination|examinations]]. | |||
[a]- | * The American Association of [[Ophthalmic]] [[Oncologists]] and [[Pathologists]] (AAOOP) [[Medical guideline|guideline]] also suggests a single dilated [[Fundus (eye)|fundus]] [[Physical examination|examination]] to evaluate for [[asymptomatic]] spontaneously regressed retinoblastoma or retinoma in all first-degree relatives of a [[patient]] with retinoblastoma, including older siblings if the [[RB1]] [[genetic analysis]] of the relatives is not done. | ||
[ | ===[[Genetic testing|Genetic Testing]] for Children with Retinoblastoma=== | ||
{{familytree/start}} | |||
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A01 | | | | | |A01=[[Genetic testing]] for children with Retinoblastoma}} | |||
{{familytree | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |!| | | }} | |||
{{familytree | |,|-|-|-|-|-|v|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|+|-|-|-|-|v|-|-|-|.| | }} | |||
{{familytree | |!| | | | | |!| | | | | | | |!| | | | |!| | | |!| | | }} | |||
{{familytree | D01 | | | | D02 | | | | | | D03 | | | D04 | | D05 |D01=Not available|D02=[[Blood]]: [[RB1]] [[mutation]](+)<br>([[germline mutation]])|D03=Blood: [[RB1]] [[mutation]](-)<br>[[Tumor]]: [[RB1]] [[mutation]](+)|D04=[[Blood]]: [[RB1]] [[mutation]](-)<br>[[Tumor]]: [[RB1]] [[mutation]](-)|D05=[[Blood]]: [[RB1]] [[mutation]](-)<br>[[Tumor]]: not available}} | |||
{{familytree | |!| | | | | |!| | | | | | | |!| | | | |!| | | |!| }} | |||
{{familytree | E01 | | | | E02 | | | | | | E03 | | | |`| E04 |'| |E01=Ophthalmic [[screening]] for all<br>the relatives with greater risk than the population |E02=Assessment of relatives<br>for familial retinoblastoma|E03=Ophthalmic [[screening]] and [[genetic analysis]]<br>not required for first degree relatives|E04=No need for [[genetic analysis]] of first degree relatives}} | |||
{{familytree | | | | | |,|-|^|-|.| | | | | |!| | | | | | |!| }} | |||
{{familytree | | | | | F01 | | F02 | | | | F03 | | | | | F04 |F01=Relatives with [[RB1]] [[mutation]]|F02=Relatives without [[RB1]] [[mutation]]|F03=Ophthlamic [[screening]] for future offspring unless negative for parent's [[mutation]]|F04=Future offspring of affected child require ophthalmic [[screening]]}} | |||
{{familytree | | | | | |!| | | |!| | | |}} | |||
{{familytree | | | | | G01 | | G02 | | |G01=Ophthalmic [[screening]] for children as high risk|G02=Ophthalmic [[screening]] not required}} | |||
{{familytree/end}} | |||
{| | |||
! colspan="2" style="background:#DCDCDC;" align="center" + |The above table is the recommended genetic analysis guidline for families with affected individuals and adopted from Ophthalmology journal<ref name="SkaletGombos2018">{{cite journal|last1=Skalet|first1=Alison H.|last2=Gombos|first2=Dan S.|last3=Gallie|first3=Brenda L.|last4=Kim|first4=Jonathan W.|last5=Shields|first5=Carol L.|last6=Marr|first6=Brian P.|last7=Plon|first7=Sharon E.|last8=Chévez-Barrios|first8=Patricia|title=Screening Children at Risk for Retinoblastoma|journal=Ophthalmology|volume=125|issue=3|year=2018|pages=453–458|issn=01616420|doi=10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.001}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
[[Category:Medicine]] | |||
[[Category: | |||
[[Category:Oncology]] | [[Category:Oncology]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Up-To-Date]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Surgery]] |
Latest revision as of 23:59, 29 July 2020
Retinoblastoma Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Retinoblastoma screening On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Retinoblastoma screening |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Retinoblastoma screening |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sahar Memar Montazerin, M.D.[2] Simrat Sarai, M.D. [3]
Overview
Early diagnosis of retinoblastoma is necessary to obtain the best outcomes for preservation of the vision and the eye. In 2018, a group of experts in clinical retinoblastoma care and ophthalmic pathology and genetics suggested a risk-stratified schedule for ophthalmic screening examinations. Estimated risk of retinoblastoma development is calculated according to the relativity of individuals to the family member with retinoblastoma.
Screening
- In 2018, a group of experts in clinical retinoblastoma care and ophthalmic pathology and genetics suggested a risk-stratified schedule for ophthalmic screening examinations.[1]
- This panel of experts recommended that all children with an elevated risk of retinoblastoma (above the population risk) should be screened via regular fundoscopic examinations.
- To schedule a screening plan, the risk of tumor development must be determined using the infant relationship to the family member with retinoblastoma.
- The table below is an estimate of patients' risk for the development of retinoblastoma depending on the relation of the patient to the affected individual:
Relative of patient | Bilateral involvement (100%) | Unilateral involvement (15%) |
---|---|---|
Offspring (infant) | 50 | 7.5 |
Parent | 5 | 0.8 |
Sibling | 2.5 | 0.4 |
Niece/nephew | 1.3 | 0.2 |
Aunt/uncle | 0.1 | 0.007 |
First cousin | 0.05 | 0.007 |
The above table adopted from Ophthalmology journal [1] |
---|
- Next step in assessing the risk of these children is to estimate the approximate relative risk of retinoblastoma development according to the percentage mentioned in the above table.
- Relatives are categorized into three categories:
- High risk: Those with a risk percentage > 7.5%
- Intermediate risk: Those with a risk percentage between 1% and 7.5% (including 7.5%)
- Low risk: Those with a risk percentage < 1%
- American Association of Ophthalmic Oncologists and Pathologists (AAOOP) guideline recommends scheduled eye examination for the screening of children at high risk of developing retinoblastoma. Screening should be initiated at birth and continued till the age of 7 years.[1]
- No further examination is required after the age of 7 years except for those who are known carriers of the RB1 gene mutation.
- For those who are carries of the RB1 gene mutation, screening should be continued indefinitely after the age of 7 years and should be done annually or every 2 years.
- The following table is the recommended eye examination schedule for unaffected children of families with retinoblastoma depending on their age and risk percentage of tumor development:
Risk category or Age | High risk | Intermediate risk | Low risk |
---|---|---|---|
Birth to 8 weeks |
|
|
|
> 8 - 12 weeks |
|
|
|
> 3 - 12 months |
|
|
|
> 12 - 24 months |
|
|
|
> 24 - 36 months |
|
|
|
> 36 - 48 months |
|
|
|
> 48 - 60 months |
|
|
|
5 - 7 years |
|
|
|
This table is adopted from Ophthalmology journal[1] |
---|
- The schedule presented above is general guideline for at-risk children when no lesions of concern have been noted. Some children may require more frequent examinations.
- The American Association of Ophthalmic Oncologists and Pathologists (AAOOP) guideline also suggests a single dilated fundus examination to evaluate for asymptomatic spontaneously regressed retinoblastoma or retinoma in all first-degree relatives of a patient with retinoblastoma, including older siblings if the RB1 genetic analysis of the relatives is not done.
Genetic Testing for Children with Retinoblastoma
Genetic testing for children with Retinoblastoma | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not available | Blood: RB1 mutation(+) (germline mutation) | Blood: RB1 mutation(-) Tumor: RB1 mutation(+) | Blood: RB1 mutation(-) Tumor: RB1 mutation(-) | Blood: RB1 mutation(-) Tumor: not available | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ophthalmic screening for all the relatives with greater risk than the population | Assessment of relatives for familial retinoblastoma | Ophthalmic screening and genetic analysis not required for first degree relatives | No need for genetic analysis of first degree relatives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relatives with RB1 mutation | Relatives without RB1 mutation | Ophthlamic screening for future offspring unless negative for parent's mutation | Future offspring of affected child require ophthalmic screening | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ophthalmic screening for children as high risk | Ophthalmic screening not required | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The above table is the recommended genetic analysis guidline for families with affected individuals and adopted from Ophthalmology journal[1] |
---|
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Skalet, Alison H.; Gombos, Dan S.; Gallie, Brenda L.; Kim, Jonathan W.; Shields, Carol L.; Marr, Brian P.; Plon, Sharon E.; Chévez-Barrios, Patricia (2018). "Screening Children at Risk for Retinoblastoma". Ophthalmology. 125 (3): 453–458. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.001. ISSN 0161-6420.