Third degree AV block other diagnostic studies: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(43 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Third degree AV block}}
{{Third degree AV block}}
{{CMG}} {{AE}} {{Soroush}}
{{CMG}} {{AE}} {{Sara.Zand}} {{Soroush}}
==Overview==
==Overview==
Other diagnostic studies for third-degree AV block include diagnostic electrophysiologic studies, which may demonstrate atrioventricular (AV) conduction abnormalities and help to determine the level of the block.Ambulatory monitoring is warranted in cases of possible transient heart block, or some other bradyarrhythmias that might be mistaken with third-degree AV block. Cardiac catheterization or stress testing is warranted if ischemic heart disease is suspected.
[[Ambulatory monitoring]] is warranted in cases of possible [[transient heart block]], or some other [[bradyarrhythmias]] that might be mistaken with [[third-degree AV block]]. Worsening [[atrioventricular  block]]  with [[isoproterenol]] and [[atropine]] may be suggestive of [[infranodal  block]]. Improvement of [[atrioventricular conduction]]  with [[carotid  sinus  massage]]  may  be  observed in [[patients]] with [[infranodal]] [[atrioventricular block]].


=== Other Diagnostic Studies ===
== Other Diagnostic Studies ==
Electrophysiologic studies (EPS) are rarely done to diagnose patients with complete AV block and  may demonstrate:<ref>Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). ''Eur Heart J''. 2013;34(29):2281-2329. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht150</ref><ref>Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, et al. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.044 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society [published correction appears in J Am Coll Cardiol]. 2019 Aug 20;74(7):1016-1018]. ''J Am Coll Cardiol''. 2019;74(7):e51-e156. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.044</ref>


* Atrioventricular (AV) conduction abnormalities
* Determining the level of the block (AV nodal or infranodal)
* Mapping, and providing basic material for intervention and placement of a pacemaker
*


'''Ambulatory monitoring''' is warranted in cases of:  
{| style="cellpadding=0; cellspacing= 0; width: 600px;"
*Transient heart block
|-
*Other bradyarrhythmias that might be mistaken with third-degree AV block
| style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #4682B4; color: #FFFFFF;" align=center |'''Other diagnostic testing for bradycardia associated atrioventricular block'''
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |''' ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|Class IIa, Level of Evidence B]]):'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑'''[[Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring]]''' is recommended in the presence of first degree [[atrioventricular block]] or second degree [[atrioventricular block]] mobitz type 1  on [[ECG]] with [[symptoms]] of [[bradycardia]] ([[dizziness]], [[faint]]) and unclear [[etiology]], to establish correlation between [[symptoms]] and [[rhythm]] abnormalities.<br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |''' ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|Class IIa, Level of Evidence C]]):'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑'''[[Exercise treadmill test]]''' is recommended in the presence of [[chest pain]] or [[shortness of breath]] during [[exercise]] and first degree or second degree [[atrioventricular block]] during rest [[ECG]]<br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''  ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|Class IIb, Level of Evidence B]]):'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑'''[[EPS]]''' is reasonable in second degree [[atrioventricular block]] for determining the level of block and benefit of [[PPM]]<br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|Class IIb, Level of Evidence C]]):'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑ '''[[Carotid sinus massage]] '''or pharmacological challenge with [[atropine]] or [[isoproterenol]], [[procainamide]] can be used in [[patients]] with second degree [[atrioventricular block]] to determine the level of block and the need for [[PPM]] insertion<br>
|}
<span style="font-size:85%">'''Abbreviations:'''
'''PPM:''' [[Permanent pacemaker]];
'''EPS:''' [[Electrophysiologic study]]
</span>
<br>
{|
! colspan="2" style="background: PapayaWhip;" align="center" + |The above table adopted from 2018 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline<ref name="KusumotoSchoenfeld2019">{{cite journal|last1=Kusumoto|first1=Fred M.|last2=Schoenfeld|first2=Mark H.|last3=Barrett|first3=Coletta|last4=Edgerton|first4=James R.|last5=Ellenbogen|first5=Kenneth A.|last6=Gold|first6=Michael R.|last7=Goldschlager|first7=Nora F.|last8=Hamilton|first8=Robert M.|last9=Joglar|first9=José A.|last10=Kim|first10=Robert J.|last11=Lee|first11=Richard|last12=Marine|first12=Joseph E.|last13=McLeod|first13=Christopher J.|last14=Oken|first14=Keith R.|last15=Patton|first15=Kristen K.|last16=Pellegrini|first16=Cara N.|last17=Selzman|first17=Kimberly A.|last18=Thompson|first18=Annemarie|last19=Varosy|first19=Paul D.|title=2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society|journal=Circulation|volume=140|issue=8|year=2019|issn=0009-7322|doi=10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628}}</ref>
|-
|}


Finally, if there are concerns for ischemic heart disease the '''cardiac catheterization''' or '''stress testing''' is warranted and might show:
*Pieces of evidence of active coronary ischemia
*Filling defect in the angiogram
*Positive stress test
<br />




===Notes===
* [[Third-degree]] or [[complete atrioventricular block]] suggests no conduction at all from [[atria]] to [[ventricles]] and may be [[paroxysmal]] or [[persistent]] and is usually associated with either a [[junctional]] or [[ventricular]] escape [[rhythm]].
* [[Complete atrioventricular block]] may be identified in the setting of [[AF]] when the [[ventricular]] response is [[slow]] (<50 bpm) and [[ regular]]. Also, [[junctional rhythm]] can be seen in [[complete heart block]].
* [[Electrocardiographic monitoring]] can be used to identify the changes in [[QRS]] morphology such as alternating [[bundle branch block]].
* [[Treadmill exercise stress testing]] can be used to identify the development of [[atrioventricular block]] and presence of [[ischemia]] as a precursor of [[atrioventricular block]].<ref name="pmid11703999">{{cite journal |vauthors=Barold SS |title=Lingering misconceptions about type I second-degree atrioventricular block |journal=Am J Cardiol |volume=88 |issue=9 |pages=1018–20 |date=November 2001 |pmid=11703999 |doi=10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01980-4 |url=}}</ref>
* [[Exercise]] causes [[vagal]] withdrawal and increased [[sympathetic]] tone leading to improved [[atrioventricular nodal conduction]].
* [[Exercise]]  may worsen [[atrioventricular block]] by increased [[heart rate]] in the setting of [[infranodal]] [[atrioventricular block]].<ref name="pmid1191459">{{cite journal |vauthors=Bakst A, Goldberg B, Schamroth L |title=Significance of exercise-induced second degree atrioventricular block |journal=Br Heart J |volume=37 |issue=9 |pages=984–6 |date=September 1975 |pmid=1191459 |pmc=482908 |doi=10.1136/hrt.37.9.984 |url=}}</ref>
* In the presence of [[bundle  branch  block]] or [[hemiblock]] on resting [[ECG]], suspicion  of episodic  high-grade or complete  [[atrioventricular  block]] may raise.
* [[EPS]] can also determine the [[bradycardia]] due to [[extrasystole]] which is similar to [[atrioventricular block]] on resting [[ECG]].
* Use of [[procainamide]] in [[patients]] with [[bifascicular block]] was associated with prolonged H-V interval indicating [[infranodal atrioventricular block]]. <ref name="pmid2462213">{{cite journal |vauthors=Twidale N, Heddle WF, Tonkin AM |title=Procainamide administration during electrophysiology study--utility as a provocative test for intermittent atrioventricular block |journal=Pacing Clin Electrophysiol |volume=11 |issue=10 |pages=1388–97 |date=October 1988 |pmid=2462213 |doi= |url=}}</ref>
* [[Atropine]] may improve or have no change in [[atrioventricular conduction block]] if the block is at the level of the  [[atrioventricular node]]  but may worsen  [[atrioventricular]] conduction block in the presence of [[intra-His]] or distal conduction disease.<ref name="pmid7064840">{{cite journal |vauthors=Mangiardi LM, Bonamini R, Conte M, Gaita F, Orzan F, Presbitero P, Brusca A |title=Bedside evaluation of atrioventricular block with narrow QRS complexes: usefulness of carotid sinus massage and atropine administration |journal=Am J Cardiol |volume=49 |issue=5 |pages=1136–45 |date=April 1982 |pmid=7064840 |doi=10.1016/0002-9149(82)90037-6 |url=}}</ref>
* [[Isoproterenol]]  is useful to determine the underlying [[pathologic]] [[His-Purkinje disease]] by enhancing  [[atrioventricular]]  nodal and [[sinus conduction]] and  precipitating [[heart  block]] with faster [[heart  rates]].
* Worsening [[atrioventricular  block]]  with  [[isoproterenol]] and [[atropine]] may be suggestive of [[infranodal  block]].
* Improvement of [[atrioventricular conduction]]  with [[carotid  sinus  massage]]  may  be  observed in [[patients]] with [[infranodal]] [[atrioventricular block]].<ref name="pmid7064840">{{cite journal |vauthors=Mangiardi LM, Bonamini R, Conte M, Gaita F, Orzan F, Presbitero P, Brusca A |title=Bedside evaluation of atrioventricular block with narrow QRS complexes: usefulness of carotid sinus massage and atropine administration |journal=Am J Cardiol |volume=49 |issue=5 |pages=1136–45 |date=April 1982 |pmid=7064840 |doi=10.1016/0002-9149(82)90037-6 |url=}}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 10:36, 25 July 2021

Third degree AV block Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Third degree AV block from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Third degree AV block other diagnostic studies On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Third degree AV block other diagnostic studies

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Third degree AV block other diagnostic studies

CDC on Third degree AV block other diagnostic studies

Third degree AV block other diagnostic studies in the news

Blogs on Third degree AV block other diagnostic studies

Directions to Hospitals Treating Third degree AV block

Risk calculators and risk factors for Third degree AV block other diagnostic studies

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Zand, M.D.[2] Soroush Seifirad, M.D.[3]

Overview

Ambulatory monitoring is warranted in cases of possible transient heart block, or some other bradyarrhythmias that might be mistaken with third-degree AV block. Worsening atrioventricular block with isoproterenol and atropine may be suggestive of infranodal block. Improvement of atrioventricular conduction with carotid sinus massage may be observed in patients with infranodal atrioventricular block.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Other diagnostic testing for bradycardia associated atrioventricular block
(Class IIa, Level of Evidence B):

Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring is recommended in the presence of first degree atrioventricular block or second degree atrioventricular block mobitz type 1 on ECG with symptoms of bradycardia (dizziness, faint) and unclear etiology, to establish correlation between symptoms and rhythm abnormalities.

(Class IIa, Level of Evidence C):

Exercise treadmill test is recommended in the presence of chest pain or shortness of breath during exercise and first degree or second degree atrioventricular block during rest ECG

(Class IIb, Level of Evidence B):

EPS is reasonable in second degree atrioventricular block for determining the level of block and benefit of PPM

(Class IIb, Level of Evidence C):

Carotid sinus massage or pharmacological challenge with atropine or isoproterenol, procainamide can be used in patients with second degree atrioventricular block to determine the level of block and the need for PPM insertion

Abbreviations: PPM: Permanent pacemaker; EPS: Electrophysiologic study

The above table adopted from 2018 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline[1]


Notes

References

  1. Kusumoto, Fred M.; Schoenfeld, Mark H.; Barrett, Coletta; Edgerton, James R.; Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.; Gold, Michael R.; Goldschlager, Nora F.; Hamilton, Robert M.; Joglar, José A.; Kim, Robert J.; Lee, Richard; Marine, Joseph E.; McLeod, Christopher J.; Oken, Keith R.; Patton, Kristen K.; Pellegrini, Cara N.; Selzman, Kimberly A.; Thompson, Annemarie; Varosy, Paul D. (2019). "2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society". Circulation. 140 (8). doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628. ISSN 0009-7322.
  2. Barold SS (November 2001). "Lingering misconceptions about type I second-degree atrioventricular block". Am J Cardiol. 88 (9): 1018–20. doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01980-4. PMID 11703999.
  3. Bakst A, Goldberg B, Schamroth L (September 1975). "Significance of exercise-induced second degree atrioventricular block". Br Heart J. 37 (9): 984–6. doi:10.1136/hrt.37.9.984. PMC 482908. PMID 1191459.
  4. Twidale N, Heddle WF, Tonkin AM (October 1988). "Procainamide administration during electrophysiology study--utility as a provocative test for intermittent atrioventricular block". Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 11 (10): 1388–97. PMID 2462213.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Mangiardi LM, Bonamini R, Conte M, Gaita F, Orzan F, Presbitero P, Brusca A (April 1982). "Bedside evaluation of atrioventricular block with narrow QRS complexes: usefulness of carotid sinus massage and atropine administration". Am J Cardiol. 49 (5): 1136–45. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(82)90037-6. PMID 7064840.


Template:WikiDoc Sources