Spontaneous coronary artery dissection surgery: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is an important reperfusion therapy in selected group of SCAD patients and also a rescue strategy in the management of failed PCI. | [[Coronary artery bypass graft]] ([[CABG]]) is an important [[reperfusion]] therapy in a selected group of [[SCAD]] [[ patients]] and also a rescue strategy in the management of failed [[PCI]].Indications for [[surgical revascularization]] include [[multivessel]] involvement, [[Left main coronary artery]] involvement, progression/worsening of [[dissection]] | ||
, significant narrowing of the [[arterial]] lumen, refractory or recurrent [[myocardial ischemia]]. In the event of severe refractory [[heart failure]], [[heart transplantation]] may be considered. | |||
==Surgery == | ==Surgery == | ||
*Emergent [[CABG]] should be considered for patients with [[left main dissections]], [[extensive dissections]] involving [[proximal arteries]], or in patients in whom [[PCI]] failed or who are not anatomically suitable for [[PCI]]. | *Emergent [[CABG]] should be considered for patients with [[left main dissections]], [[extensive dissections]] involving [[proximal arteries]], or in patients in whom [[PCI]] failed or who are not anatomically suitable for [[PCI]]. | ||
* | *Good early outcomes following [[CABG]] have been reported in small observational studies.<ref name="pmid25294399">{{cite journal| author=Saw J, Aymong E, Sedlak T, Buller CE, Starovoytov A, Ricci D et al.| title=Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: association with predisposing arteriopathies and precipitating stressors and cardiovascular outcomes. | journal=Circ Cardiovasc Interv | year= 2014 | volume= 7 | issue= 5 | pages= 645-55 | pmid=25294399 | doi=10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001760 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25294399 }} </ref> <ref name="pmid25406203">{{cite journal| author=Tweet MS, Eleid MF, Best PJ, Lennon RJ, Lerman A, Rihal CS et al.| title=Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: revascularization versus conservative therapy. | journal=Circ Cardiovasc Interv | year= 2014 | volume= 7 | issue= 6 | pages= 777-86 | pmid=25406203 | doi=10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001659 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25406203 }} </ref> <ref name="pmid25937347">{{cite journal| author=Lettieri C, Zavalloni D, Rossini R, Morici N, Ettori F, Leonzi O et al.| title=Management and Long-Term Prognosis of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection. | journal=Am J Cardiol | year= 2015 | volume= 116 | issue= 1 | pages= 66-73 | pmid=25937347 | doi=10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.039 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25937347 }} </ref> | ||
*Early [[graft]] failure was reported as 6% in a 20 patients series. <ref name="pmid25406203">{{cite journal| author=Tweet MS, Eleid MF, Best PJ, Lennon RJ, Lerman A, Rihal CS et al.| title=Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: revascularization versus conservative therapy. | journal=Circ Cardiovasc Interv | year= 2014 | volume= 7 | issue= 6 | pages= 777-86 | pmid=25406203 | doi=10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001659 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25406203 }} </ref> <ref name="pmid25937347">{{cite journal| author=Lettieri C, Zavalloni D, Rossini R, Morici N, Ettori F, Leonzi O et al.| title=Management and Long-Term Prognosis of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection. | journal=Am J Cardiol | year= 2015 | volume= 116 | issue= 1 | pages= 66-73 | pmid=25937347 | doi=10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.039 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25937347 }} </ref> | |||
* long term results of [[CABG]] showed lower [[graft]] patency (27%) because of spontaneous [[arterial]] healing which lead to competitive [[flow]] and [[graft]] [[thrombosis]]. <ref name="pmid22800851">{{cite journal| author=Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, Simari RD, Lerman A, Lennon RJ et al.| title=Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. | journal=Circulation | year= 2012 | volume= 126 | issue= 5 | pages= 579-88 | pmid=22800851 | doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105718 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=22800851 }} </ref> | |||
Latest revision as of 13:10, 3 March 2021
|
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Microchapters |
|
Differentiating Spontaneous coronary artery dissection from other Diseases |
|---|
|
Diagnosis |
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Type 1 Type 2A Type 2B Type 3 |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nate Michalak, B.A. Arzu Kalayci, M.D. [2]
Synonyms and keywords: SCAD
Overview
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is an important reperfusion therapy in a selected group of SCAD patients and also a rescue strategy in the management of failed PCI.Indications for surgical revascularization include multivessel involvement, Left main coronary artery involvement, progression/worsening of dissection , significant narrowing of the arterial lumen, refractory or recurrent myocardial ischemia. In the event of severe refractory heart failure, heart transplantation may be considered.
Surgery
- Emergent CABG should be considered for patients with left main dissections, extensive dissections involving proximal arteries, or in patients in whom PCI failed or who are not anatomically suitable for PCI.
- Good early outcomes following CABG have been reported in small observational studies.[1] [2] [3]
- Early graft failure was reported as 6% in a 20 patients series. [2] [3]
- long term results of CABG showed lower graft patency (27%) because of spontaneous arterial healing which lead to competitive flow and graft thrombosis. [4]
- Indications for surgical revascularization include: (CABG)[5] include:
- Multivessel involvement
- Left main coronary artery involvement
- Progression/worsening of dissection so long as there is a distal target
- Significant narrowing of the arterial lumen
- Refractory or recurrent myocardial ischemia
- In the event of severe refractory heart failure, heart transplantation may be considered.
References
- ↑ Saw J, Aymong E, Sedlak T, Buller CE, Starovoytov A, Ricci D; et al. (2014). "Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: association with predisposing arteriopathies and precipitating stressors and cardiovascular outcomes". Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 7 (5): 645–55. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001760. PMID 25294399.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Tweet MS, Eleid MF, Best PJ, Lennon RJ, Lerman A, Rihal CS; et al. (2014). "Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: revascularization versus conservative therapy". Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 7 (6): 777–86. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001659. PMID 25406203.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Lettieri C, Zavalloni D, Rossini R, Morici N, Ettori F, Leonzi O; et al. (2015). "Management and Long-Term Prognosis of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection". Am J Cardiol. 116 (1): 66–73. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.039. PMID 25937347.
- ↑ Tweet MS, Hayes SN, Pitta SR, Simari RD, Lerman A, Lennon RJ; et al. (2012). "Clinical features, management, and prognosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection". Circulation. 126 (5): 579–88. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105718. PMID 22800851.
- ↑ Shamloo BK, Chintala RS, Nasur A; et al. (2010). "Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: aggressive vs. conservative therapy". The Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 22 (5): 222–8. PMID 20440039.