The WikiDoc Manual of Style: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Editors-in-Chief:''' [[Brian Blank]] and [[C. Michael Gibson]], M.S., M.D. | |||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Good scientific writing is terse and efficient. It is objective and avoids the use of adjectives. | Good scientific writing is terse and efficient. It is objective and avoids the use of adjectives. | ||
Latest revision as of 21:56, 5 May 2009
Editors-in-Chief: Brian Blank and C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D.
Overview
Good scientific writing is terse and efficient. It is objective and avoids the use of adjectives.
Avoid the passive tense, use the present or past tense
Do not use of the passive tense with words ending in "ing". Use the present or past tense.
Avoid the words "causes" and "predicts"
Biology is largely phenomenology and it is hard to verify causal pathways.
Do not use the phrase ___"causes" ____ unless a causal pathway is firmly established.
Instead use the phrase “ ___ was associated with ___”.
Do not use the word “predictor” unless causality has been established and the observation has been validated in both an exploratory and validation cohort.
Avoid using the words I and we
Do not use the word “I” or “we”. These are too conversational and casual. Insert instead “This study examined …” not “We examined …”
Table to translate conversational / casual styel to WikiDoc / Scientific style
| Casual Style | Science Style |
|---|---|
| in patients | among patients |
| after | following |
| given | administered |
| use | received, administered |
| seen | observed |
| cell | cell |
| cell | cell |
| cell | cell |