Atrial septal defect CT: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (Bot: Adding CME Category::Cardiology) |
||
| (19 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
{{CMG}}; '''Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief:''' [[Priyamvada Singh|Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S.]] | {{Atrial septal defect}} | ||
{{CMG}}; '''Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief:''' [[Priyamvada Singh|Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S.]] [mailto:psingh13579@gmail.com]; {{CZ}}; '''Assistant Editor(s)-In-Chief:''' [[Kristin Feeney|Kristin Feeney, B.S.]] [mailto:kfeeney@elon.edu] | |||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Computed tomography can be helpful as a diagnostic tool in conditions where the echocardiographic findings are inconclusive. | [[Computed tomography]] can be helpful as a diagnostic tool in conditions where the [[echocardiographic]] findings are inconclusive. It is not the technique of choice as it has limitations in defining [[shunt]] volume and pressure differences. | ||
==CT== | |||
== | ===Advantages=== | ||
* Provides additional anatomic details compared to [[echocardiography]]. | |||
* Helps in visualization of the aberrant pulmonary venous return (seen in sinus venosus defect). <ref name="Prokop">{{cite book| author=Prokop, M., Galanski, M., Van Der Molen, A.J., Schaefer-Prokop, C.| title=Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. | year= 2001 | city=Thieme | pages= 788-789 | }} </ref> | |||
* Done faster compared to [[MRI]]. | |||
* Provides additional anatomic details compared to echocardiography | * Avoids the need for [[general anesthesia]] in children. | ||
* | * Can identify associated [[heart]] anomalies.<ref name="Prokop">{{cite book| author=Prokop, M., Galanski, M., Van Der Molen, A.J., Schaefer-Prokop, C.| title=Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. | year= 2001 | city=Thieme | pages= 788-789 | }} </ref> | ||
===Disadvantages=== | |||
* Costly | * Costly | ||
* Radiation can have long terms side-effect on growing children. | * Radiation can have long terms side-effect on growing children. | ||
* Not a modality for detecting or quantify a defect.<ref name="Prokop">{{cite book| author=Prokop, M., Galanski, M., Van Der Molen, A.J., Schaefer-Prokop, C.| title=Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. | year= 2001 | city=Thieme | pages= 788-789 | }} </ref> | |||
* Not a modality for quantifying shunt volume and pressure differences.<ref name="Prokop">{{cite journal| author=Prokop, M., Galanski, M., Van Der Molen, A.J., Schaefer-Prokop, C.| title=Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. | year= 2001 | city=Thieme | pages= 788-789 | }} </ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}} | |||
{{WikiDoc Sources}} | |||
[[CME Category::Cardiology]] | |||
[[Category:Cardiology]] | [[Category:Cardiology]] | ||
[[Category:Congenital heart disease]] | [[Category:Congenital heart disease]] | ||
[[Category:Pediatrics]] | [[Category:Pediatrics]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Embryology]] | ||
[[Category:Disease]] | |||
Latest revision as of 01:47, 15 March 2016
|
Atrial Septal Defect Microchapters | |
|
Treatment | |
|---|---|
|
Surgery | |
|
| |
|
Special Scenarios | |
|
Case Studies | |
|
Atrial septal defect CT On the Web | |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Atrial septal defect CT | |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Atrial septal defect CT | |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S. [2]; Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3]; Assistant Editor(s)-In-Chief: Kristin Feeney, B.S. [4]
Overview
Computed tomography can be helpful as a diagnostic tool in conditions where the echocardiographic findings are inconclusive. It is not the technique of choice as it has limitations in defining shunt volume and pressure differences.
CT
Advantages
- Provides additional anatomic details compared to echocardiography.
- Helps in visualization of the aberrant pulmonary venous return (seen in sinus venosus defect). [1]
- Done faster compared to MRI.
- Avoids the need for general anesthesia in children.
- Can identify associated heart anomalies.[1]
Disadvantages
- Costly
- Radiation can have long terms side-effect on growing children.
- Not a modality for detecting or quantify a defect.[1]
- Not a modality for quantifying shunt volume and pressure differences.[1]