Coronary artery bypass surgery mri angiography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Esther Lee (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Coronary artery bypass surgery}} {{CMG}}; '''Associate Editors-in-Chief:''' {{CZ}}, Mohammed A. Sbeih, M.D. [mailto:msbeih@perfuse.org] ==MR angiogr...") |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-msbeih@perfuse.org +msbeih@wikidoc.org, -psingh@perfuse.org +psingh13579@gmail.com, -agovi@perfuse.org +agovi@wikidoc.org, -rgudetti@perfuse.org +ravitheja.g@gmail.com, -lbiller@perfuse.org +lbiller@wikidoc.org,...) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Coronary artery bypass surgery}} | {{Coronary artery bypass surgery}} | ||
{{CMG}}; '''Associate Editors-in-Chief:''' {{CZ}}, [[User:Mohammed Sbeih|Mohammed A. Sbeih, M.D.]] [mailto:msbeih@ | {{CMG}}; '''Associate Editors-in-Chief:''' {{CZ}}, [[User:Mohammed Sbeih|Mohammed A. Sbeih, M.D.]] [mailto:msbeih@wikidoc.org] | ||
== | ==MRI angiography== | ||
The specificity of MRI in the assessment of SVG patency is reported to be 76% to 91%. Only 66% of distal anastomoses were identified correctly.<ref> Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW, et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the noninvasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts and recipients coronary arteries. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1052–1058.</ref><ref name="pmid12537417">{{cite journal |author=Wittlinger T, Voigtländer T, Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Thelen M, Meyer J |title=Non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging of coronary bypass grafts. comparison of the haste- and navigator techniques with conventional coronary angiography |journal=[[Int J Cardiovasc Imaging]] |volume=18 |issue=6 |pages=469–77; discussion 483–4 |year=2002 |month=December |pmid=12537417 |doi= |url=http://www.kluweronline.com/art.pdf?issn=1569-5794&volume=18&page=469 |issn= |accessdate=2010-07-23}}</ref> | The specificity of MRI in the assessment of SVG patency is reported to be 76% to 91%. Only 66% of distal anastomoses were identified correctly.<ref> Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW, et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the noninvasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts and recipients coronary arteries. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1052–1058.</ref><ref name="pmid12537417">{{cite journal |author=Wittlinger T, Voigtländer T, Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Thelen M, Meyer J |title=Non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging of coronary bypass grafts. comparison of the haste- and navigator techniques with conventional coronary angiography |journal=[[Int J Cardiovasc Imaging]] |volume=18 |issue=6 |pages=469–77; discussion 483–4 |year=2002 |month=December |pmid=12537417 |doi= |url=http://www.kluweronline.com/art.pdf?issn=1569-5794&volume=18&page=469 |issn= |accessdate=2010-07-23}}</ref> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:48, 2 November 2012
|
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Microchapters | |
|
Pathophysiology | |
|---|---|
|
Diagnosis | |
|
Treatment | |
|
Perioperative Monitoring | |
|
Surgical Procedure | |
|
Special Scenarios | |
|
Coronary artery bypass surgery mri angiography On the Web | |
|
Directions to Hospitals Performing Coronary artery bypass surgery mri angiography | |
|
Risk calculators for Coronary artery bypass surgery mri angiography | |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editors-in-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2], Mohammed A. Sbeih, M.D. [3]
MRI angiography
The specificity of MRI in the assessment of SVG patency is reported to be 76% to 91%. Only 66% of distal anastomoses were identified correctly.[1][2]
References
- ↑ Langerak SE, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW, et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging for the noninvasive detection of stenosis in coronary artery bypass grafts and recipients coronary arteries. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1052–1058.
- ↑ Wittlinger T, Voigtländer T, Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Thelen M, Meyer J (2002). "Non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging of coronary bypass grafts. comparison of the haste- and navigator techniques with conventional coronary angiography" (PDF). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 18 (6): 469–77, discussion 483–4. PMID 12537417. Retrieved 2010-07-23. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help)