Paratyphoid fever laboratory findings: Difference between revisions
m Changes made per Mahshid's request |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:Disease]] | [[Category:Disease]] | ||
[[Category:Bacterial diseases]] | [[Category:Bacterial diseases]] | ||
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}} | {{WikiDoc Help Menu}} | ||
{{WikiDoc Sources}} | {{WikiDoc Sources}} |
Latest revision as of 18:38, 18 September 2017
Paratyphoid fever Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Paratyphoid fever laboratory findings On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Paratyphoid fever laboratory findings |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Paratyphoid fever laboratory findings |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Please help WikiDoc by adding more content here. It's easy! Click here to learn about editing.
Overview
A single blood culture is positive in only half the cases. Stool culture is not usually positive during the acute phase of the disease. Bone marrow culture increases the diagnostic yield to about 80% of cases. The Widal test is an old serologic assay for detecting IgM and IgG to the O and H antigens of salmonella. The test is unreliable but is widely used in developing countries because of its low cost. Newer serologic assays are somewhat more sensitive and specific than the Widal test but are infrequently available. Because there is no definitive serologic test for typhoid or paratyphoid fever, the diagnosis often has to be made clinically. Paratyphoid B is diagnosed by the isolation of the agent in blood or stool and demonstration of antibodies anti BH in the Widal test. Antibodies to paratyphoid C are not usually tested and the diagnosis is made with blood cultures.
References