Syphilis laboratory findings: Difference between revisions
Aysha Aslam (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{CMG}}{{AE}}{{AA}} | {{CMG}}{{AE}}{{AA}}; {{NRM}} | ||
{{Syphilis}} | {{Syphilis}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Labortary tests which may help diagnose syphilis include darkfield examinations and tests to detect T. pallidum in lesion exudate or tissue, PCR, nontreponemal (e.g., [[VDRL|venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL)]] and [[RPR|rapid plasma reagent test]]) and treponemal tests (e.g., [[FTA-ABS|fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) tests]], the T. pallidum passive particle agglutination (TP-PA) assay, various [[Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)|enzyme immunoassays]], and [[Chemiluminescence|chemiluminescence immunoassays]]).<ref name=CDC2016>http://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/syphilis.htm Accessed on September 28th, 2016</ref><ref name="pmid18159528">{{cite journal| author=Ratnam S| title=The laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. | journal=Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol | year= 2005 | volume= 16 | issue= 1 | pages= 45-51 | pmid=18159528 | doi= | pmc=2095002 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=18159528 }} </ref><ref name="pmid22942884">{{cite journal| author=Tsang RS, Radons SM, Morshed M| title=Laboratory diagnosis of syphilis: A survey to examine the range of tests used in Canada. | journal=Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol | year= 2011 | volume= 22 | issue= 3 | pages= 83-7 | pmid=22942884 | doi= | pmc=3200370 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=22942884 }} </ref><ref name="pmid25428245">{{cite journal| author=Morshed MG, Singh AE| title=Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis. | journal=Clin Vaccine Immunol | year= 2015 | volume= 22 | issue= 2 | pages= 137-47 | pmid=25428245 | doi=10.1128/CVI.00681-14 | pmc=4308867 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25428245 }} </ref><ref name="pmid24278076">{{cite journal| author=Pastuszczak M, Wojas-Pelc A| title=Current standards for diagnosis and treatment of syphilis: selection of some practical issues, based on the European (IUSTI) and U.S. (CDC) guidelines. | journal=Postepy Dermatol Alergol | year= 2013 | volume= 30 | issue= 4 | pages= 203-10 | pmid=24278076 | doi=10.5114/pdia.2013.37029 | pmc=3834708 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24278076 }} </ref> | Labortary tests which may help diagnose syphilis include darkfield examinations and tests to detect ''T. pallidum'' in lesion exudate or tissue, [[PCR]], nontreponemal (e.g., [[VDRL|venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL)]] and [[RPR|rapid plasma reagent test]]) and treponemal tests (e.g., [[FTA-ABS|fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) tests]], the ''T. pallidum'' passive particle agglutination (TP-PA) assay, various [[Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)|enzyme immunoassays]], and [[Chemiluminescence|chemiluminescence immunoassays]]).<ref name=CDC2016>http://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/syphilis.htm Accessed on September 28th, 2016</ref><ref name="pmid18159528">{{cite journal| author=Ratnam S| title=The laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. | journal=Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol | year= 2005 | volume= 16 | issue= 1 | pages= 45-51 | pmid=18159528 | doi= | pmc=2095002 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=18159528 }} </ref><ref name="pmid22942884">{{cite journal| author=Tsang RS, Radons SM, Morshed M| title=Laboratory diagnosis of syphilis: A survey to examine the range of tests used in Canada. | journal=Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol | year= 2011 | volume= 22 | issue= 3 | pages= 83-7 | pmid=22942884 | doi= | pmc=3200370 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=22942884 }} </ref><ref name="pmid25428245">{{cite journal| author=Morshed MG, Singh AE| title=Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis. | journal=Clin Vaccine Immunol | year= 2015 | volume= 22 | issue= 2 | pages= 137-47 | pmid=25428245 | doi=10.1128/CVI.00681-14 | pmc=4308867 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25428245 }} </ref><ref name="pmid24278076">{{cite journal| author=Pastuszczak M, Wojas-Pelc A| title=Current standards for diagnosis and treatment of syphilis: selection of some practical issues, based on the European (IUSTI) and U.S. (CDC) guidelines. | journal=Postepy Dermatol Alergol | year= 2013 | volume= 30 | issue= 4 | pages= 203-10 | pmid=24278076 | doi=10.5114/pdia.2013.37029 | pmc=3834708 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24278076 }} </ref> | ||
==Laboratory Findings== | ==Laboratory Findings== | ||
Laboratory tests which may help diagnose syphilis include the following:<ref name=CDC2016>ttp://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/syphilis.htm Accessed on September 28th, 2016</ref><ref name="pmid18159528">{{cite journal| author=Ratnam S| title=The laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. | journal=Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol | year= 2005 | volume= 16 | issue= 1 | pages= 45-51 | pmid=18159528 | doi= | pmc=2095002 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=18159528 }} </ref><ref name="pmid25428245">{{cite journal| author=Morshed MG, Singh AE| title=Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis. | journal=Clin Vaccine Immunol | year= 2015 | volume= 22 | issue= 2 | pages= 137-47 | pmid=25428245 | doi=10.1128/CVI.00681-14 | pmc=4308867 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25428245 }} </ref><ref name="pmid22942884">{{cite journal| author=Tsang RS, Radons SM, Morshed M| title=Laboratory diagnosis of syphilis: A survey to examine the range of tests used in Canada. | journal=Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol | year= 2011 | volume= 22 | issue= 3 | pages= 83-7 | pmid=22942884 | doi= | pmc=3200370 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=22942884 }} </ref><ref name="pmid25428245">{{cite journal| author=Morshed MG, Singh AE| title=Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis. | journal=Clin Vaccine Immunol | year= 2015 | volume= 22 | issue= 2 | pages= 137-47 | pmid=25428245 | doi=10.1128/CVI.00681-14 | pmc=4308867 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25428245 }} </ref><ref name="pmid24278076">{{cite journal| author=Pastuszczak M, Wojas-Pelc A| title=Current standards for diagnosis and treatment of syphilis: selection of some practical issues, based on the European (IUSTI) and U.S. (CDC) guidelines. | journal=Postepy Dermatol Alergol | year= 2013 | volume= 30 | issue= 4 | pages= 203-10 | pmid=24278076 | doi=10.5114/pdia.2013.37029 | pmc=3834708 | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=24278076 }} </ref> | |||
*Darkfield examinations and tests to detect T. pallidum in lesion exudate or tissue are the definitive methods for diagnosing early syphilis. | *Darkfield examinations and tests to detect ''T. pallidum'' in lesion [[exudate]] or tissue are the definitive methods for diagnosing early syphilis. | ||
*Although no T. pallidum detection tests are commercially available, some laboratories provide locally developed PCR tests for the detection of T. pallidum. | *Although no ''T. pallidum'' detection tests are commercially available, some laboratories provide locally developed [[PCR]] tests for the detection of ''T. pallidum''. | ||
*A presumptive diagnosis of syphilis is possible with the use of two types of serologic tests: | *A presumptive diagnosis of syphilis is possible with the use of two types of serologic tests: | ||
:*Nontreponemal tests (e.g., [[VDRL|venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL)]] and [[RPR|rapid plasma reagent test]]) and | :*Nontreponemal tests (e.g., [[VDRL|venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL)]] and [[RPR|rapid plasma reagent test]]) and | ||
:*Treponemal tests (e.g., [[FTA-ABS|fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) tests]], the T. pallidum passive particle agglutination (TP-PA) assay, various [[Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)|enzyme immunoassays]], and [[Chemiluminescence|chemiluminescence immunoassays]]). | :*Treponemal tests (e.g., [[FTA-ABS|fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) tests]], the ''T. pallidum'' passive particle agglutination (TP-PA) assay, various [[Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)|enzyme immunoassays]], and [[Chemiluminescence|chemiluminescence immunoassays]]). | ||
*The use of only one type of serologic test is insufficient for diagnosis | *The use of only one type of serologic test is insufficient for diagnosis because each type of test has limitations, including the possibility of false-positive test results in persons without syphilis. | ||
*False-positive nontreponemal test results can be associated with various medical conditions unrelated to syphilis, including autoimmune conditions, older age, and injection-drug use | *False-positive nontreponemal test results can be associated with various medical conditions unrelated to syphilis, including autoimmune conditions, older age, and injection-drug use.<ref name="pmid7548285">{{cite journal |author=Nandwani R, Evans DT |title=Are you sure it's syphilis? A review of false positive serology |journal=[[International Journal of STD & AIDS]] |volume=6 |issue=4 |pages=241–8 |year=1995 |pmid=7548285 |doi= |url= |accessdate=2012-02-16}}</ref><ref name="urlwww.aphl.org">{{cite web |url=http://www.aphl.org/aphlprograms/infectious/std/Documents/LaboratoryGuidelinesTreponemapallidumMeetingReport.pdf |title=www.aphl.org |format= |work= |accessdate=2012-12-19}}</ref> Therefore, persons with a reactive nontreponemal test should receive a treponemal test to confirm the diagnosis of syphilis. | ||
===Nontreponemal test=== | ===Nontreponemal test=== | ||
*Includes VDRL and RPR tests | *Includes [[Venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) test|VDRL]] and [[Rapid plasma reagent|RPR]] tests | ||
*Antibody titers may correlate with disease activity | *Antibody titers may correlate with disease activity | ||
*May reverse following treatment | *May reverse following treatment | ||
*Used to follow treatment response | *Used to follow treatment response | ||
*A fourfold change in titer is necessary to demonstrate significant difference between two nontreponemal tests | *A fourfold change in titer is necessary to demonstrate significant difference between two nontreponemal tests | ||
*Results from two tests cannot be compared directly with | *Results from two tests cannot be compared directly with each other | ||
===Trepenomal tests === | ===Trepenomal tests === | ||
*Include [[FTA-ABS|fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) tests]], T. pallidum passive particle agglutination (TP-PA) assay, [[Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)|enzyme immunoassays]], and [[Chemiluminescence|chemiluminescence immunoassays]] | *Include [[FTA-ABS|fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) tests]], ''T. pallidum'' passive particle agglutination (TP-PA) assay, [[Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)|enzyme immunoassays]], and [[Chemiluminescence|chemiluminescence immunoassays]] | ||
*Antibody | *Antibody titers, once positive, remain positive for the rest of the patient's life, regardless of treatment or disease activity | ||
* | *Cannot be used for monitoring treatment response | ||
*Screening using trepenomal tests may help identify individuals previously treated for syphilis, those with untreated or incompletely treated syphilis, and persons with false-positive results | *Screening using trepenomal tests may help identify individuals previously treated for syphilis, those with untreated or incompletely treated syphilis, and persons with false-positive results | ||
Revision as of 19:34, 13 October 2016
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aysha Anwar, M.B.B.S[2]; Nate Michalak, B.A.
Syphilis Microchapters | |
Diagnosis | |
Treatment | |
Case Studies | |
Syphilis laboratory findings On the Web | |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Syphilis laboratory findings | |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Syphilis laboratory findings | |
Overview
Labortary tests which may help diagnose syphilis include darkfield examinations and tests to detect T. pallidum in lesion exudate or tissue, PCR, nontreponemal (e.g., venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) and rapid plasma reagent test) and treponemal tests (e.g., fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) tests, the T. pallidum passive particle agglutination (TP-PA) assay, various enzyme immunoassays, and chemiluminescence immunoassays).[1][2][3][4][5]
Laboratory Findings
Laboratory tests which may help diagnose syphilis include the following:[1][2][4][3][4][5]
- Darkfield examinations and tests to detect T. pallidum in lesion exudate or tissue are the definitive methods for diagnosing early syphilis.
- Although no T. pallidum detection tests are commercially available, some laboratories provide locally developed PCR tests for the detection of T. pallidum.
- A presumptive diagnosis of syphilis is possible with the use of two types of serologic tests:
- Nontreponemal tests (e.g., venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) and rapid plasma reagent test) and
- Treponemal tests (e.g., fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) tests, the T. pallidum passive particle agglutination (TP-PA) assay, various enzyme immunoassays, and chemiluminescence immunoassays).
- The use of only one type of serologic test is insufficient for diagnosis because each type of test has limitations, including the possibility of false-positive test results in persons without syphilis.
- False-positive nontreponemal test results can be associated with various medical conditions unrelated to syphilis, including autoimmune conditions, older age, and injection-drug use.[6][7] Therefore, persons with a reactive nontreponemal test should receive a treponemal test to confirm the diagnosis of syphilis.
Nontreponemal test
- Includes VDRL and RPR tests
- Antibody titers may correlate with disease activity
- May reverse following treatment
- Used to follow treatment response
- A fourfold change in titer is necessary to demonstrate significant difference between two nontreponemal tests
- Results from two tests cannot be compared directly with each other
Trepenomal tests
- Include fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) tests, T. pallidum passive particle agglutination (TP-PA) assay, enzyme immunoassays, and chemiluminescence immunoassays
- Antibody titers, once positive, remain positive for the rest of the patient's life, regardless of treatment or disease activity
- Cannot be used for monitoring treatment response
- Screening using trepenomal tests may help identify individuals previously treated for syphilis, those with untreated or incompletely treated syphilis, and persons with false-positive results
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 http://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/syphilis.htm Accessed on September 28th, 2016
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Ratnam S (2005). "The laboratory diagnosis of syphilis". Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 16 (1): 45–51. PMC 2095002. PMID 18159528.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Tsang RS, Radons SM, Morshed M (2011). "Laboratory diagnosis of syphilis: A survey to examine the range of tests used in Canada". Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 22 (3): 83–7. PMC 3200370. PMID 22942884.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Morshed MG, Singh AE (2015). "Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis". Clin Vaccine Immunol. 22 (2): 137–47. doi:10.1128/CVI.00681-14. PMC 4308867. PMID 25428245.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Pastuszczak M, Wojas-Pelc A (2013). "Current standards for diagnosis and treatment of syphilis: selection of some practical issues, based on the European (IUSTI) and U.S. (CDC) guidelines". Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 30 (4): 203–10. doi:10.5114/pdia.2013.37029. PMC 3834708. PMID 24278076.
- ↑ Nandwani R, Evans DT (1995). "Are you sure it's syphilis? A review of false positive serology". International Journal of STD & AIDS. 6 (4): 241–8. PMID 7548285.
|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ↑ "www.aphl.org" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-12-19.