Cysticercosis laboratory findings

Cysticercosis Microchapters
Home
Patient Information
Overview
Historical Perspective
Classification
Pathophysiology
Causes
Differentiating Cysticercosis from Other Diseases
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Factors
Screening
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms
Physical Examination
Laboratory Findings
CT
MRI
Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Surgery
Primary Prevention
Case Studies
Case #1
Cysticercosis laboratory findings On the Web
Most recent articles
Most cited articles
Review articles
CME Programs
Powerpoint slides
Images
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cysticercosis laboratory findings All Images X-rays Echo & Ultrasound CT Images MRI
Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse
NICE Guidance
FDA on Cysticercosis laboratory findings
CDC on Cysticercosis laboratory findings
Cysticercosis laboratory findings in the news
Blogs on Cysticercosis laboratory findings
Directions to Hospitals Treating Cysticercosis
Risk calculators and risk factors for Cysticercosis laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Diagnostic criteria

A set of diagnostic criteria were proposed by Del Brutto et al based on the laboratory and imaging tests. The criteria were modified in 2001 to be: (22)

Categories	Details
Absolute	Cystic lesions with the scolex in it on CT scan or MRI Histologic confirmation of the parasite on a biopsy from a lesion in the brain or spinal cord Visualization of subretinal parasites directly using funduscopic examination
Major	Positivity of serum anticysticercal antibodies using enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot assay (EITB) Highly suggestive lesions of neurocysticercosis on neuroimaging Resolution of small single enhancing lesions spontaneously Resolution of intracranial cystic lesions after trreatment with albendazole or praziquantel
Minor	Lesions that are compatible with neurocysticercosis on neuroimaging (CT or MRI) Clinical presentation that is suggestive of neurocysticercosis. Positive findings from cerebrospinal fluid enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of anticysticercal antibodies or cysticercal antigens Diagnosing cysticercosis remotely (outside the central nervous system)
Epidemiologic	Evidence of T.solium infection in a household contact Individuals who are staying in or coming from an area of cysticercosis endemicity Household contact with an individual infected with T solium History of travelling frequently to a disease endemic areas
Certainity of diagnosis after applying the criteria
Certainity of diagnosis	Details
Definitive	Fulfilling 1 absolute criterion Fulfilling 2 major criteria in addition to 1 minor criterion and 1 epidemiologic criterion
Probable	Fulfilling 1 major criterion in addition to 2 minor criteria Fulfilling 1 major criterion in addition to 1 minor criterion and 1 epidemiologic criterion Fulfilling 3 minor criteria in addition to 1 epidemiologic criterion

Laboratory Findings

The definitive diagnosis consists of demonstrating the cysticercus in the tissue involved. Demonstration of Taenia solium eggs and proglottids in the feces diagnoses taeniasis and not cysticercosis. While suggestive, it does not necessarily prove that cysticercosis is present. Persons who are found to have eggs or proglottids in their feces should be evaluated serologically since autoinfection, resulting in cysticercosis, can occur.

Stool Examination

Microscopic identification of eggs and proglottids in feces is diagnostic for taeniasis; however, eggs and proglottids are not released into the feces until approximately 2 to 3 months after the adult tapeworm is established in the upper jejunum. Repeated examination and concentration techniques will increase the likelihood of detecting light infections. Examination of 3 stool samples collected on different days is recommended to increase the sensitivity of microscopic methods. Eggs of Taenia spp. cannot be differentiated; a species determination may be possible if mature, gravid proglottids (or, more rarely, examination of the scolex) are present.

Cysticercosis: Antibody Detection

• CDC's immunoblot is based on detection of antibody to one or more of 7 lentil-lectin purified structural glycoprotein antigens from the larval cysts of T. solium in an immunoblot format.
• It is 100% specific and has a sensitivity superior to that of any other test yet evaluated. Serum specimens from 97% of parasitologically confirmed cases of cysticercosis have detectable antibodies. No serum samples from patients with other microbial infections react with any of the T. solium-specific antigens.
• The most important factors identified as determining positive immunoblot reactions are the numbers and stage of development of cysticerci. Cumulative clinical experience has confirmed that in patients with multiple (more than two) lesions, the test has more than 95% sensitivity. Seropositivity in biopsy-confirmed patients with single, enhancing parenchymal cysts was <50%; in clinically defined patients with a single cyst but who were not biopsied, sensitivity was 70%. Seropositivity in serum and CSF of patients with multiple but only calcified cysts was 82 and 77%, respectively.
• In all patients, regardless of their clinical presentation, the immunoblot assay is slightly more sensitive in serum than in CSF specimens: consequently, there is no need to obtain CSF solely for use in the immunoblot assay.

• CDC's immunoblot is both more specific and more sensitive than enzyme immunoassay (EIA) systems with which it has been compared. Lack of specificity has been a major problem in most EIAs because of cross-reacting components in crude antigens derived from cysticerci; these components react with antibodies specific for other helminthic infections, especially echinococcosis and filariasis. Most partially purified fractions evaluated in an EIA appear to have lower sensitivity than crude antigens and do not necessarily achieve higher specificity. Assays employing crude antigens for the detection of antibody are not reliable for the identification of this disease; all positives and any negative strongly suspected of cysticercosis should be confirmed by immunoblot. Currently available antibody detection tests for cysticercosis do not distinguish between active and inactive infections and thus have not been useful in evaluating the outcomes and prognoses of medically treated patients. Both the CDC immunoblot and an EIA are commercially available in the United States.

• CDC's immunoblot assay with purified Taenia solium antigens has been acknowledged by the World Health Organization and the Pan American Health Organization as the immunodiagnostic test of choice for confirming a clinical and radiologic presumptive diagnosis of neurocysticercosis.

Cysticercosis immunoblot

• Typical antibody reactions in CDC's immunoblot for cysticercosis. Individual sera from patients with either cysticercosis or echinococcosis were analyzed using the immunoblot for cysticercosis.

• Cysticercosis-specific antibodies react with glycoproteins derived from T. solium cysts. The positions of the seven diagnostic glycoproteins are marked and designated according to their relative mobilities in SDS-PAGE. Sera from patients with cysticercosis react with at least one of the cysticercosis-specific proteins, whereas sera from patients with echinococcosis do not react with any of the seven diagnostic proteins.

External Link

http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/taeniasis/health_professionals/index.html