Gynecomastia classification: Difference between revisions
Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
===Classification based on severity=== | ===Classification based on severity=== | ||
Gynecomastia can be | Gynecomastia can be classified on the basis of severity as: | ||
* Grade I: Minor enlargement | * Grade I: Minor enlargement with no skin excess | ||
* Grade II: Moderate enlargement | * Grade II: Moderate enlargement with no skin excess | ||
* Grade III: Moderate enlargement | * Grade III: Moderate enlargement with skin excess | ||
* Grade IV: Marked enlargement | * Grade IV: Marked enlargement with skin excess | ||
=== Classifcation based on | === Classifcation based on etiology === | ||
*[[Gynecomastia causes|Physiological]] | *[[Gynecomastia causes|Physiological]] | ||
*[[Gynecomastia causes|Pathological]] | *[[Gynecomastia causes|Pathological]] |
Revision as of 17:36, 29 August 2017
Gynecomastia Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Gynecomastia classification On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Gynecomastia classification |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Gynecomastia classification |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Husnain Shaukat, M.D [2], Omodamola Aje B.Sc, M.D. [3]
Overview
Gynecomastia has been classified by various systems mainly based on surgical management, the severity of gynecomastia, physical appearance, and etiology. Breast size and ptosis are the most commonly included features.
Classification
Different gynecomastia classification systems are:[1][2][3][4][5][6]
Surgical classification of gynecomastia
Author | Year | Method of classification | Classification system |
---|---|---|---|
Nydick | 1961 | Physical |
|
Tanner | 1971 | Physical |
|
Simon | 1973 | Physical | |
Deutinger and Freilinger | 1986 | Physical |
|
Cohen | 1987 | Physical | |
Rohrich | 2003 | Physical/Tissue type |
|
Gusenoff | 2008 | Physical |
|
Barros | 2012 | Physical |
|
Çi̇l | 2012 | Imaging (computed tomography) |
|
Cordova | 2008 | Physical |
|
Fruhstorfer | 2003 | Physical |
|
Mladick | 2004 | Physical |
|
Monarca | 2013 | Physical/tissue type |
|
Ratnam | 2009 | Physical |
|
Webster | 1946 | Tissue type |
|
*NAC, nipple-areola complex; IMF, inframammary fold
Classification based on severity
Gynecomastia can be classified on the basis of severity as:
- Grade I: Minor enlargement with no skin excess
- Grade II: Moderate enlargement with no skin excess
- Grade III: Moderate enlargement with skin excess
- Grade IV: Marked enlargement with skin excess
Classifcation based on etiology
References
- ↑ Waltho D, Hatchell A, Thoma A (2017). "Gynecomastia Classification for Surgical Management: A Systematic Review and Novel Classification System". Plast Reconstr Surg. 139 (3): 638e–648e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003059. PMID 28234829.
- ↑ Monarca C, Rizzo MI (2013). "Gynecomastia: tips and tricks-classification and surgical approach". Plast Reconstr Surg. 131 (5): 863e–5e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318287a18f. PMID 23629140.
- ↑ Rohrich RJ, Ha RY, Kenkel JM, Adams WP (2003). "Classification and management of gynecomastia: defining the role of ultrasound-assisted liposuction". Plast Reconstr Surg. 111 (2): 909–23, discussion 924-5. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000042146.40379.25. PMID 12560721.
- ↑ Wollina, U; Goldman, A (June 2011). "Minimally invasive esthetic procedures of the male breast". Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 10 (2): 150–155. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2011.00548.x. PMID 21649820.
- ↑ Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S (1973). "Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia". Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 51 (1): 48–52. PMID 4687568.
- ↑ Gikas P, Mokbel K (2007). "Management of gynaecomastia: an update". Int J Clin Pract. 61 (7): 1209–15. doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01095.x. PMID 17362482.