Cellulitis cost-effectiveness of therapy: Difference between revisions
m Changes made per Mahshid's request |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Cellulitis}} | {{Cellulitis}} | ||
The use of prophylactic antibiotic therapy to prevent the recurrence of cellulitis was shown to be cost-effective. Low dose penicillin serves to prevent future attacks and offers no significant increase in cost. | |||
A study done in a pediatric population comparing intravenous antibiotic treatment at home versus in the hospital setting showed the former as the more effective and less costly option. | |||
With regard to diagnostic modalities, blood cultures have been shown to be of low yield, with minimal impact on clinical management, thereby not cost-effective for most patients. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 12:34, 20 November 2020
|
Cellulitis Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Cellulitis cost-effectiveness of therapy On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cellulitis cost-effectiveness of therapy |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Cellulitis cost-effectiveness of therapy |
The use of prophylactic antibiotic therapy to prevent the recurrence of cellulitis was shown to be cost-effective. Low dose penicillin serves to prevent future attacks and offers no significant increase in cost.
A study done in a pediatric population comparing intravenous antibiotic treatment at home versus in the hospital setting showed the former as the more effective and less costly option.
With regard to diagnostic modalities, blood cultures have been shown to be of low yield, with minimal impact on clinical management, thereby not cost-effective for most patients.