Rabies other diagnostic studies: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:


==Overview==
==Overview==
There are no other diagnostic studies associated with [disease name].


OR
[Diagnostic study] may be helpful in the diagnosis of [disease name]. Findings suggestive of/diagnostic of [disease name] include [finding 1], [finding 2], and [finding 3].
OR
Other diagnostic studies for [disease name] include [diagnostic study 1], which demonstrates [finding 1], [finding 2], and [finding 3], and [diagnostic study 2], which demonstrates [finding 1], [finding 2], and [finding 3].
==Other Diagnostic Studies==
==Other Diagnostic Studies==
*There are no other diagnostic studies associated with rabies.
*There are no other diagnostic studies associated with rabies.

Revision as of 03:35, 28 September 2017

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:

Overview

Other Diagnostic Studies

  • There are no other diagnostic studies associated with rabies.
  • The nucleic acid sequence ̶ based amplification (NASBA) technique on urine samples may be helpful in the future diagnosis of rabies.
  • The nucleic acid sequence ̶ based amplification (NASBA) technique on CSF and saliva may be used for the diagnosis of rabies after 2 days of start of symptoms.[1][2]


References

  1. Wacharapluesadee S, Hemachudha T (2001). "Nucleic-acid sequence based amplification in the rapid diagnosis of rabies". Lancet. 358 (9285): 892–3. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06041-X. PMID 11567709.
  2. Wacharapluesadee S, Hemachudha T (2002). "Urine samples for rabies RNA detection in the diagnosis of rabies in humans". Clin. Infect. Dis. 34 (6): 874–5. doi:10.1086/338872. PMID 11850870.


Template:WikiDoc Sources