Diffuse large B cell lymphoma historical perspective: Difference between revisions
Mahshid |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Diffuse large B cell lymphoma}} | {{Diffuse large B cell lymphoma}} | ||
In 1865, Samuel Wilks used the term "Hodgkin's disease" in Annals of medicine on the name of "Thomas Hodgkin" who published a paper on some morbid appearances of absorbent glands and spleen in 1832<ref>Wilks S. Cases with enlargement of the lymphatic glands and spleen (or Hodgkin’s disease) with remarks. Guy’s Hosp Rep. 1865;11:57–67</ref>. Consequently, the other heterogeneous lymph node neoplastic disorder was later named as Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL). Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is now one of the leading malignancies worldwide and Diffuse Large b cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is one of the most common types of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 02:09, 13 July 2018
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma historical perspective On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Diffuse large B cell lymphoma historical perspective |
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma historical perspective in the news |
Blogs on Diffuse large B cell lymphoma historical perspective |
Directions to Hospitals Treating Diffuse large B cell lymphoma |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Diffuse large B cell lymphoma historical perspective |
In 1865, Samuel Wilks used the term "Hodgkin's disease" in Annals of medicine on the name of "Thomas Hodgkin" who published a paper on some morbid appearances of absorbent glands and spleen in 1832[1]. Consequently, the other heterogeneous lymph node neoplastic disorder was later named as Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL). Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is now one of the leading malignancies worldwide and Diffuse Large b cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is one of the most common types of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
References
- ↑ Wilks S. Cases with enlargement of the lymphatic glands and spleen (or Hodgkin’s disease) with remarks. Guy’s Hosp Rep. 1865;11:57–67