Cyanosis screening: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
==Screening== | ==Screening== | ||
Prenatal [[echocardiography]] and genetic testing are useful methods for early detection of [[cyanotic]] [[congenital heart disease]]. | |||
== Genetic assessment == | == Genetic assessment == |
Revision as of 17:05, 6 November 2020
Cyanosis Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Cyanosis screening On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cyanosis screening |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:
Overview
Screening
Prenatal echocardiography and genetic testing are useful methods for early detection of cyanotic congenital heart disease.
Genetic assessment
- Fetal genetic assessment is indicated because chromosome abnormalities are common in fetuses with cardiac defects, even when isolated.
- The risk of fetal aneuploidy varies depending on the malformation. [14]:
- The 22q11 deletion has been associated with several cardiac anomalies, including interrupted aortic arch, truncus arteriosus, ventricular septal defect, and tetralogy of Fallot. [14].
- The two main approaches for genetic testing are:
- G-banding of fetal cells obtained via amniocentesis, with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) to assess for microdeletions, such as 22q11, not detectable by visual banding techniques.
- Chromosomal microarray, which detects submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in 5 percent of fetuses with ultrasound-detected anomalies and a normal G-band karyotype.
- Disadvantages of chromosomal microarray are that balanced rearrangements are not detectable and variants of unknown significance may be identified.