Third degree AV block surgery: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:


●'''Class III''' – Conditions in which permanent pacing is not beneficial/useful and, in some cases, maybe harmful.
●'''Class III''' – Conditions in which permanent pacing is not beneficial/useful and, in some cases, maybe harmful.
<br />
=== Class-I  ===
* Patients with symptomatic atrioventricular block as a consequence of guideline-directed management for which there is no alternative treatment and continued treatment is clinically necessary; a permanent pacemaker is recommended to improve symptoms.
* Symptomatic sinus bradycardia (usually with a heart rate below 40 beats per minute)
* Symptomatic chronotropic incompetence
* Patients with symptomatic atrioventricular block as a consequence of guideline-directed management for which there is no alternative treatment and continued treatment is clinically necessary; a permanent pacemaker is recommended to improve symptoms.
* Complete heart block with or without sysmptoms
* Symptomatic second degree AV block, Mobitz type II
* Symptomatic second degree AV block, Mobitz type I
* Exercise induced second or third degree AV block in absence of myocardial ischemia
* Advanced second degree AV block (block of two or more consecutive P waves)
=== Class-II ===
<br />
<br />


Line 23: Line 39:
:** Myotonic dystrophy type 1
:** Myotonic dystrophy type 1
:**Kearns-Sayre Syndrome
:**Kearns-Sayre Syndrome
:*Patients with symptomatic atrioventricular block as a consequence of guideline-directed management for which there is no alternative treatment and continued treatment is clinically necessary; a permanent pacemaker is recommended to improve symptoms.
:*.
:* Patients with infiltrative cardiomyopathies, such as cardiac sarcoidosis or amyloidosis, and second-degree Mobitz type II atrioventricular block, high-grade atrioventricular block, or third-degree atrioventricular block with a life expectancy of greater than one years; permanent pacemaker is reasonable.
:* Patients with infiltrative cardiomyopathies, such as cardiac sarcoidosis or amyloidosis, and second-degree Mobitz type II atrioventricular block, high-grade atrioventricular block, or third-degree atrioventricular block with a life expectancy of greater than one years; permanent pacemaker is reasonable.
:* Patients with marked first-degree or second-degree Mobitz type 1 AV block with symptoms that are attributable to the atrioventricular block, permanent pacing is reasonable.
:* Patients with marked first-degree or second-degree Mobitz type 1 AV block with symptoms that are attributable to the atrioventricular block, permanent pacing is reasonable.

Revision as of 13:08, 13 June 2020

Third degree AV block Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Third degree AV block from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Third degree AV block surgery On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Third degree AV block surgery

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Third degree AV block surgery

CDC on Third degree AV block surgery

Third degree AV block surgery in the news

Blogs on Third degree AV block surgery

Directions to Hospitals Treating Third degree AV block

Risk calculators and risk factors for Third degree AV block surgery

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]; Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [3] Soroush Seifirad, M.D.[4]

Surgery

Implantation of permanent pacemakers in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients is usually done. Asymptomatic Mobitz II are prone to be converted to symptomatic or third degree heart AV block. Thus, they should be considered for a pacemaker even if asymptomatic.

Pacemaker Indications

The American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the Heart Rhythm Society (ACC/AHA/HRS) have published guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers. Some of these indications are certain, while others require considerable expertise and judgment.

The ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines divided these guidelines for pacemaker implantation into three specific categories.

Class I – Conditions in which permanent pacing is definitely recommended, beneficial, and useful.

Class II – Conditions in which permanent pacing may be reasonable, but there is conflicting evidence and/or divergence opinion.

Class III – Conditions in which permanent pacing is not beneficial/useful and, in some cases, maybe harmful.


Class-I

  • Patients with symptomatic atrioventricular block as a consequence of guideline-directed management for which there is no alternative treatment and continued treatment is clinically necessary; a permanent pacemaker is recommended to improve symptoms.
  • Symptomatic sinus bradycardia (usually with a heart rate below 40 beats per minute)
  • Symptomatic chronotropic incompetence
  • Patients with symptomatic atrioventricular block as a consequence of guideline-directed management for which there is no alternative treatment and continued treatment is clinically necessary; a permanent pacemaker is recommended to improve symptoms.
  • Complete heart block with or without sysmptoms
  • Symptomatic second degree AV block, Mobitz type II
  • Symptomatic second degree AV block, Mobitz type I
  • Exercise induced second or third degree AV block in absence of myocardial ischemia
  • Advanced second degree AV block (block of two or more consecutive P waves)

Class-II


  • Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and symptomatic bradycardia.
  • Patients with acquired second-degree Mobitz type II heart block, third-degree atrioventricular block not attributable to reversible causes, require a permanent pacemaker regardless of symptoms.
  • Patients with the following neuromuscular diseases with evidence of second-degree and third-degree atrioventricular block require permanent pacemaker regardless of the symptoms.
    • Myotonic dystrophy type 1
    • Kearns-Sayre Syndrome
  • .
  • Patients with infiltrative cardiomyopathies, such as cardiac sarcoidosis or amyloidosis, and second-degree Mobitz type II atrioventricular block, high-grade atrioventricular block, or third-degree atrioventricular block with a life expectancy of greater than one years; permanent pacemaker is reasonable.
  • Patients with marked first-degree or second-degree Mobitz type 1 AV block with symptoms that are attributable to the atrioventricular block, permanent pacing is reasonable.
  • Patients with alternating bundle branch block.
  • Patients with Anderson-Fabry disease and QRS prolongation more significant than 110 ms with a meaning life expectancy greater than one year, a permanent pacemaker can be considered.
  • Patients with postoperative sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block associated with persistent symptoms that do not resolve after isolated coronary artery bypass surgery, permanent pacing is recommended.
  • Patients with postoperative sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block associated with persistent symptoms that do not resolve after mitral valve repair or replacement surgery, permanent pacing is recommended before discharge.
  • Patients who have new postoperative sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block associated with persistent symptoms that do not resolve after aortic valve replacement, permanent pacing is recommended before discharge.
  • Patients who have a new atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement associated with symptoms that do not resolve, permanent pacing is recommended.

Pacing Mode

VVI pacing mode was widely used in the past. But this mode has been shown to be associated with AV dyssynchrony leading to pacemaker syndrome. A dual chamber DDD pacemaker is preferred over a single chambered VVI pacemakers as it maintains physiologic AV synchrony. A dual-chamber artificial pacemaker is a type of device that typically listens for a pulse from the SA node and sends a pulse to the AV node at an appropriate interval, essentially completing the connection between the two nodes. Pacemakers in this role are usually programmed to enforce a minimum heart rate and to record instances of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation , two common secondary conditions that can accompany third degree AV block.

References

Template:WikiDoc Sources