Sandbox:huda: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==FIRE: Focused Initial Rapid Evaluation==
A Focused Initial Rapid Evaluation (FIRE) should be performed to identify patients in need of immediate intervention.
<span style="font-size:85%">Boxes in red signify that an urgent management is needed.</span>
<span style="font-size:85%">'''Abbreviations:''' '''CAD:''' [[coronary artery disease]]; '''DVT:''' [[deep venous thrombosis]]; '''ECG:''' [[electrocardiogram]]; '''ICU:''' [[intensive care unit]]; '''JVD:''' [[jugular venous distension]]; '''LBBB:''' [[left bundle branch block]]; '''NSTEMI:''' [[NSTEMI|non-ST elevation myocardial infarction]]; '''STEMI:''' [[ST elevation myocardial infarction]];  '''TEE:''' [[transesophageal echocardiography]]  </span>
== Acidosis ==
== Acidosis ==



Revision as of 04:00, 6 August 2020

FIRE: Focused Initial Rapid Evaluation

A Focused Initial Rapid Evaluation (FIRE) should be performed to identify patients in need of immediate intervention.

Boxes in red signify that an urgent management is needed.

Abbreviations: CAD: coronary artery disease; DVT: deep venous thrombosis; ECG: electrocardiogram; ICU: intensive care unit; JVD: jugular venous distension; LBBB: left bundle branch block; NSTEMI: non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI: ST elevation myocardial infarction; TEE: transesophageal echocardiography







Acidosis

Historical perspective

PH = 7.3-7.5 [1]




COVID-19 and DM

Diagnosis

  • The gold standard test for the diagnosis of DM in covid-19 microbiologic analysis [2][3][4]



The diagnosis of COVID-19 cannot be made without microbiologic analysis.



COVID-19 Microchapter outline

Pulmonary Complications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pulmonary complications
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
COVID-19 approach to hypoxia/hypoxemia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ARDS
 
Pulmonary embolism
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bacterial pneumonia/super-infection
 
Co-infection (e.g. flue)
 
 
 
 
 
Pulmonary hypertension
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Microchapter Template
 
Microchapter Template
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Microchapter Template
 
Microchapter Template
 
 
 
 
 
Microchapter Template













Scholars

Sumanth Khadke, MD[1]

Rana Aljebzi, MD[2]

Nuha Al-Howthi, MD[3]


Eman Alademi, MD[4]

Tayyaba Ali, M.D.[5]

Asia Alriashi, MD[6]




Medication

Hydroxychloroquine

215 studies worldwide 55 studies in the USA Placebo: Vitamin D, Pacebo: Calcium citrate, Vit C, Mannitol, glucose tablets, Folic Acid, Ascorbic Acid Combination/comparison: Drug: Vitamin D, Zinc sulfate, Azythromycin, Doxycycline,Indomethacin, Zithromax Oral Product, Ivermectin, Camostat Mesilate, Bromhexine, Nitazoxanide, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Sirolimus, Telmisartan, Active Comparator (Ciclesonide inhalor), Favipiravir, diltiazem and niclosamide, Clevudine, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Favipiravir, Interferon-β 1a, Bromhexine, Baricitinib, Nitazoxanide,



Purpose of study:

Primary prevention Post-exposure prophylaxis Treatment Clinical improvement Viral load clearance from Nasopharyngeal sample

Design/Strategy:

Phase 2 vs 3 vs 4 2 arm study vs 4 arm study Dose-based (200 vs 400 vs 600 mg) Frequenc-based ( Once vs twice vs trice per day) Duration-based (5 vs 10 vs 14 ... days)

Hydroxychloroquine

Country Intervention Objective Design&Date Strategy Outcome
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, China Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)

(Preprint article)

Treatment efficacy evaluation
  • February 4 to February 28, 2020
  • 62 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis
  • Participants were randomized in a parallel-group trial
  • Males: 46.8%; Female: 53.2%; Mean age: 44.7 years. age and sex were adjusted between the control group and the HCQ group
  • 31 patients treatment group
  • A 5-day HCQ (400 mg/d) treatment
  • The HCQ effect was evaluated at baseline and 5 days after treatment by assessing the following:
    • Time to clinical recovery (TTCR), clinical characteristics, and radiological results
  • TTCR, the body temperature recovery time and the cough remission time were significantly shortened in the HCQ treatment group
  • (80.6%, 25 of 31of patients with improved pneumonia in the HCQ treatment group compared with the control group (54.8%, 17 of 31)
  • 4 patients progressed to severe illness that occurred in the control group
  • 2 patients with mild adverse reactions in the HCQ treatment group
  • Conclusion: The use of HCQ could significantly shorten TTCR and promote the absorption of pneumonia in patients with COVID-19
Méditerranée Infection University Hospital Institute in Marseille, France Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin Treatment efficacy evaluation
  • Early March to March 16th
  • 36 out of 42 patients meeting the inclusion criteria
  • 6 lost to follow up
  • 20 hydroxychloroquine-treated patients
  • 16 control patients
  • Patients were included in a single-arm protocol
  • Inclusion criteria:
    • Age >12 years
    • PCR documented SARS-CoV-2 carriage in nasopharyngeal sample at admission regardless of the clinical status
  • Control was untreated patients from another center and cases refusing the protocol
  • Endpoint: presence and absence of virus at Day6-post inclusion
  • 600mg of HCQ daily
    • 200 mg, three times per day for ten days
  • Viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs was tested daily in a hospital setting

Azithromycin:

  • Added depending on the clinical presentation
  • 500mg on day1 followed by 250mg per day, the next four days
  • To prevent bacterial super-infection under daily electrocardiogram control
  • There was a statistically significant difference between treated patients and controls at days 3-4-5 and 6 (negative PCR)
  • At day 6, 70% of HCQ-treated patients were virologically cured comparing with 12.5% in the control group (p= 0.001)

HCQ vs HCQ-Azithromycin combination

  • There was a statistically significant difference between treated patients and controls at days 3-4-5 and 6 (negative PCR)
  • At day 6, 100% of patients treated with HCQ and azithromycin combination were virologically cured comparing with 57.1% in patients treated with HCQ only, and 12.5% in the control group (p < 0.001)

Conclusion:

  • HCQ is significantly associated with viral load reduction/disappearance in COVID-19 patients and its effect is reinforced by azithromycin
Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Cantabria, Spain HDQ Chemoprophylaxis
  • Start scheduled for the second week of May 2020
  • Prospective, single center, double blind, randomised, controlled trial (RCT)
  • 450 Adult health-care professionals (18-65 years)
  • Working in areas of high exposure and high risk of transmission of SARS-COV-2
  • Oral Hydroxychloroquine 200mg, once-daily, for two months (HC group) or placebo (P group)
    1. Intervention: (n = 225): One 200 mg hydroxychloroquine sulfate coated tablet once daily for two months.
    2. Comparator (control group) (n = 225): One hydroxychloroquine placebo tablet (identical to that of the drug) once daily for two months
  • In addition to the protective measures appropriate to the level of exposure established by the hospital.
  • A serological evaluation every 15 days with PCR in case of seroconversion, symptoms or risk exposure.
Eight hospitals in Spain Melatonin Prophylaxis Recruitement (May 21-31)

450 participants

225 in the experimental arm

225 in the placebo arm.

Experimental: Melatonin (Circadin®, 2 mg of melatonin orally before bedtime for 12 weeks.

Comparator: Identical looking placebo, orally before bedtime for 12 weeks.

References

  1. Yeomans ER, Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC, Strickland DM (1985). "Umbilical cord pH, PCO2, and bicarbonate following uncomplicated term vaginal deliveries". Am J Obstet Gynecol. 151 (6): 798–800. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(85)90523-x. PMID 3919587.
  2. Wu Z, McGoogan JM (2020). "Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention". JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2648. PMID 32091533 Check |pmid= value (help).
  3. Wu, Zunyou; McGoogan, Jennifer M. (2020). "Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China". JAMA. 323 (13): 1239. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2648. ISSN 0098-7484.
  4. Wu Z, McGoogan JM (2020). "Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention". JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2648. PMID 32091533 Check |pmid= value (help).