Duplicated collecting system: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
==Diagnostic Findings== | ==Diagnostic Findings== | ||
*Excretory urography may demonstrate the duplicated anatomy. Limitation is that a poorly functioning system may not excrete contrast and may resemble a mass. | *Excretory urography may demonstrate the duplicated anatomy. Limitation is that a poorly functioning system may not excrete contrast and may resemble a mass. | ||
*The drooping lily sign: inferolateral displacement of the opacified lower pole moiety in a duplex kidney from an obstructed (unopacified) upper pole moeity. | *The drooping lily sign: inferolateral displacement of the opacified lower pole moiety in a duplex kidney from an obstructed (unopacified) upper pole moeity. | ||
| Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
*MR urography may demonstrate the typical anatomic findings, but is an expensive alternative. | *MR urography may demonstrate the typical anatomic findings, but is an expensive alternative. | ||
*Renal scintigraphy can show the anatomy as well as evaluate for renal function. | *Renal scintigraphy can show the anatomy as well as evaluate for renal function. | ||
[http://www.radswiki.net Images courtesy of RadsWiki] | |||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
Image:Duplicated-collecting-system-001.jpg | Image:Duplicated-collecting-system-001.jpg|Duplicated collecting system | ||
Image:Duplicated-collecting-system-002.jpg | Image:Duplicated-collecting-system-002.jpg|Duplicated collecting system | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | |||
{{SIB}} | {{SIB}} | ||
Revision as of 19:36, 14 March 2009
| Duplicated collecting system | |
 |
|---|
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.
Overview
Duplicated collecting system is the most common upper urinary tract anomaly, affecting nearly 15% of the population.
Embryologically occurs when 2 separate ureteric buds arise from a single wolffian duct. The future lower pole ureter separates from Wolffian duct earlier and migrates superiorly and laterally as the urogenital sinus grows.
Weigert-Meyer rule for bladder insertion: the upper pole ureter inserts inferior and medial to lower ureter.
Alternatively, the 2 ureters may fuse to form a single ureter prior to inserting into the bladder, termed a bifid system.
The lower pole system is usually dominant, while the upper system may drain a single or few calices.
The upper pole ureter may demonstrate a ureterocele, which is associated with ureteral obstruction and recurrent UTIs in children. The upper pole ureter may also be ectopic or stenotic.
Symptoms
- Most patients are symptomatic and are diagnosed as an incidental finding.
- Vesicoureteral reflux
- Recurrent UTIs, with resultant parenchymal scarring
- Ureteropelvic junction obstruction
- Hydronephrosis, which may be severe enough to cause a palpable mass and hypertension
- Urinary incontinence with ectopic insertion in female
Diagnostic Findings
- Excretory urography may demonstrate the duplicated anatomy. Limitation is that a poorly functioning system may not excrete contrast and may resemble a mass.
- The drooping lily sign: inferolateral displacement of the opacified lower pole moiety in a duplex kidney from an obstructed (unopacified) upper pole moeity.
- Voiding cystourethrogram is usually diagnostic and may demonstrate ectopic insertion and reflux.
- Ultrasound is an easy, noninvasive exam that may show the duplex kidney and hydronephrosis. May not be able to differentiate between complete duplication and a bifid system.
- CT urography may demonstrate the duplicated system and show the location of bladder insertion for each moiety.
- MR urography may demonstrate the typical anatomic findings, but is an expensive alternative.
- Renal scintigraphy can show the anatomy as well as evaluate for renal function.
-
Duplicated collecting system
-
Duplicated collecting system
