Bias of an estimator

WikiDoc Resources for Bias of an estimator
Articles
Most recent articles on Bias of an estimator Most cited articles on Bias of an estimator Review articles on Bias of an estimator Articles on Bias of an estimator in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ
Media
Powerpoint slides on Bias of an estimator Images of Bias of an estimator Photos of Bias of an estimator Podcasts & MP3s on Bias of an estimator Videos on Bias of an estimator
Evidence Based Medicine
Cochrane Collaboration on Bias of an estimator Bandolier on Bias of an estimator TRIP on Bias of an estimator
Clinical Trials
Ongoing Trials on Bias of an estimator at Clinical Trials.gov Trial results on Bias of an estimator Clinical Trials on Bias of an estimator at Google
Guidelines / Policies / Govt
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Bias of an estimator NICE Guidance on Bias of an estimator NHS PRODIGY Guidance FDA on Bias of an estimator CDC on Bias of an estimator
Books
Books on Bias of an estimator
News
Bias of an estimator in the news Be alerted to news on Bias of an estimator News trends on Bias of an estimator
Commentary
Blogs on Bias of an estimator
Definitions
Definitions of Bias of an estimator
Patient Resources / Community
Patient resources on Bias of an estimator Discussion groups on Bias of an estimator Patient Handouts on Bias of an estimator Directions to Hospitals Treating Bias of an estimator Risk calculators and risk factors for Bias of an estimator
Healthcare Provider Resources
Symptoms of Bias of an estimator Causes & Risk Factors for Bias of an estimator Diagnostic studies for Bias of an estimator Treatment of Bias of an estimator
Continuing Medical Education (CME)
CME Programs on Bias of an estimator
International
Bias of an estimator en Espanol Bias of an estimator en Francais
Business
Bias of an estimator in the Marketplace Patents on Bias of an estimator
Experimental / Informatics
List of terms related to Bias of an estimator

Overview

In statistics, the difference between an estimator's expected value and the true value of the parameter being estimated is called the bias. An estimator or decision rule having nonzero bias is said to be biased.

Although the term bias sounds pejorative, it is not necessarily used in that way in statistics. Biased estimators may have desirable properties. Not only do they sometimes have a smaller mean squared error than any unbiased estimator, but in some cases the only unbiased estimators are not even within the convex hull of the parameter space, so their use is absurd.

Definition

Suppose we are trying to estimate the parameter <math>\theta</math> using an estimator <math>\widehat{\theta}</math> (that is, some function of the observed data). Then the bias of <math>\widehat{\theta}</math> is defined to be

<math>

\operatorname{E}(\widehat{\theta})-\theta.\, </math>

In words, this would be "the expected value of the estimator <math>\widehat{\theta}</math> minus the true value <math>\theta</math>." This may be rewritten as

<math>

\operatorname{E}(\widehat{\theta}-\theta).\, </math>

which would read "the expected value of the difference between the estimator and the true value" (the expected value of <math>\theta</math> is precisely <math>\theta</math>).

Examples

Estimating variance

Suppose X₁, ..., X_n are independent and identically distributed normal random variables with expectation μ and variance σ². Let

<math>\overline{X}=(X_1+\cdots+X_n)/n</math>

be the "sample average", and let

<math>S^2=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n(X_i-\overline{X}\,)^2</math>

be a "sample variance". Then S² is a "biased estimator" of σ² because

<math>\operatorname{E}(S^2)=\frac{n-1}{n}\sigma^2\neq\sigma^2.</math>

Note that when a transformation is applied to an unbiased estimator, the result is not necessarily itself an unbiased estimate of its corresponding population statistic. That is, for a non-linear function f and an unbiased estimator U of a parameter p, f(U) is usually not an unbiased estimator of f(p). For example the square root of the unbiased estimator of the population variance is not an unbiased estimator of the population standard deviation.

Bias is not the only consideration when choosing a statistic, however. Bias refers to the central tendency of the sampling distribution of a statistic, but the variance of the sampling distribution can also be an important consideration. Specifically, statistics with smaller sampling variances will yield greater statistical power. For example, while S² above is more biased than the traditional sample calculation

<math>S_\mathrm{unbiased}^2=\frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^n(X_i-\overline{X}\,)^2,</math>

S² has a lower estimation variability than S²_unbiased because the denominator dividing the sum of squares is larger in the calculation of S², resulting in a smaller scale of final values, and therefore lower estimation variability, than that of S²_unbiased. Practically, this demonstrates that for some applications (where the amount of bias can be equated between groups/conditions) it is possible that a biased estimator can prove to be a more powerful, and therefore useful, statistic. The use of n − 1 rather than n is sometimes called Bessel's correction.

Estimating a Poisson probability

A far more extreme case of a biased estimator being better than any unbiased estimator is well-known: Suppose X has a Poisson distribution with expectation λ. It is desired to estimate

<math>\operatorname{P}(X=0)^2=e^{-2\lambda}.\quad</math>

(For example, when incoming calls at a telephone switchboard are modeled as a Poisson process, and λ is the average number of calls per minute, then e^−2λ is the probability that no calls arrive in the next two minutes.)

The only function of the data constituting an unbiased estimator is

<math>\delta(X)=(-1)^X.\quad</math>

If the observed value of X is 100, then the estimate is 1, although the true value of the quantity being estimated is obviously very likely to be near 0, which is the opposite extreme. And if X is observed to be 101, then the estimate is even more absurd: it is −1, although the quantity being estimated obviously must be positive.

The (biased) maximum likelihood estimator

<math>e^{-2X}\quad</math>

is far better than this unbiased estimator. Not only is its value always positive, but it is also more accurate in the sense that its mean squared error

<math>e^{-4\lambda}-2e^{\lambda(1/e^2-3)}+e^{\lambda(1/e^4-1)}</math>

is smaller; compare the unbiased estimator's MSE of

<math>1-e^{-4\lambda}</math>

The MSE is a function of the true value λ. The bias of the maximum-likelihood estimator is:

<math>e^{-2\lambda}-e^{\lambda(1/e^2-1)}</math>.

Maximum of a discrete uniform distribution

The bias of maximum-likelihood estimators can be substantial. Consider a case where n tickets numbered from 1 through to n are placed in a box and one is selected at random, giving a value X. If n is unknown, then the maximum-likelihood estimator of n is X, even though the expectation of X is only (n + 1)/2; we can only be certain that n is at least X and is probably more. In this case, the natural unbiased estimator is 2X − 1.

See also

• Omitted-variable bias
• Cognitive bias

External links

• An Illuminating Counterexample

Template:WH Template:WS