Determinants of Sapheous Vein Graft Patency: Difference between revisions
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Graft patency is dependent on a number of factors, including the type of graft used ([[internal thoracic artery]], [[radial artery]], or [[great saphenous vein]]), the size or the [[coronary artery]] that the graft is anastomosed with, and, of course, the skill of the surgeon(s) performing the procedure. Arterial grafts (e.g. left internal mammary (LIMA), radial) are far more sensitive to rough handling than the [[saphenous vein]]s and may go into spasm if handled improperly. | Graft patency is dependent on a number of factors, including the type of graft used ([[internal thoracic artery]], [[radial artery]], or [[great saphenous vein]]), the size or the [[coronary artery]] that the graft is anastomosed with, and, of course, the skill of the surgeon(s) performing the procedure. Arterial grafts (e.g. left internal mammary (LIMA), radial) are far more sensitive to rough handling than the [[saphenous vein]]s and may go into spasm if handled improperly. | ||
==Systemic Risk Factors for SVG Failure== | |||
[[Diabetes]],[[hyperlipidemia]],[[smoking]], and to variable degrees [[hypertension]] are all risk facotrs for SVG failure <ref name="pmid6333635">{{cite journal | author = Campeau L, Enjalbert M, Lespérance J, Bourassa MG, Kwiterovich P, Wacholder S, Sniderman A | title = The relation of risk factors to the development of atherosclerosis in saphenous-vein bypass grafts and the progression of disease in the native circulation. A study 10 years after aortocoronary bypass surgery | journal = [[The New England Journal of Medicine]] | volume = 311 | issue = 21 | pages = 1329–32 | year = 1984 | month = November | pmid = 6333635 | doi = 10.1056/NEJM198411223112101 | url = http://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJM198411223112101?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed | issn = | accessdate = 2010-11-09}}</ref>. There is some data to suggest that lipoprotein subfractions may be associated with SVG failure such as [[HDL]] cholesterol and plasma [[LDL]] [[apoprotein B]]. | |||
==In-situ vs Free Grafts== | ==In-situ vs Free Grafts== | ||
Generally the best patency rates are achieved with the in-situ (the proximal end is left connected to the [[subclavian artery]]) left [[internal thoracic artery]] (a LIMA) with the distal end being anastomosed with the [[coronary artery]] (typically the [[left anterior descending artery]] or a diagonal branch artery). Lesser patency rates can be expected with [[radial artery]] grafts and "free" [[internal thoracic artery]] grafts (where the proximal end of the thoracic artery is excised from its origin from the [[subclavian artery]] and re-anastomosed with the [[ascending aorta]]). | Generally the best patency rates are achieved with the in-situ (the proximal end is left connected to the [[subclavian artery]]) left [[internal thoracic artery]] (a LIMA) with the distal end being anastomosed with the [[coronary artery]] (typically the [[left anterior descending artery]] or a diagonal branch artery). Lesser patency rates can be expected with [[radial artery]] grafts and "free" [[internal thoracic artery]] grafts (where the proximal end of the thoracic artery is excised from its origin from the [[subclavian artery]] and re-anastomosed with the [[ascending aorta]]). | ||
==Venous vs Arterial Conduits== | ==Venous vs Arterial Conduits== | ||
Revision as of 17:28, 9 November 2010
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [2]
Please Join in Editing This Page and Apply to be an Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [3] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.
Graft patency is dependent on a number of factors, including the type of graft used (internal thoracic artery, radial artery, or great saphenous vein), the size or the coronary artery that the graft is anastomosed with, and, of course, the skill of the surgeon(s) performing the procedure. Arterial grafts (e.g. left internal mammary (LIMA), radial) are far more sensitive to rough handling than the saphenous veins and may go into spasm if handled improperly.
Systemic Risk Factors for SVG Failure
Diabetes,hyperlipidemia,smoking, and to variable degrees hypertension are all risk facotrs for SVG failure [1]. There is some data to suggest that lipoprotein subfractions may be associated with SVG failure such as HDL cholesterol and plasma LDL apoprotein B.
In-situ vs Free Grafts
Generally the best patency rates are achieved with the in-situ (the proximal end is left connected to the subclavian artery) left internal thoracic artery (a LIMA) with the distal end being anastomosed with the coronary artery (typically the left anterior descending artery or a diagonal branch artery). Lesser patency rates can be expected with radial artery grafts and "free" internal thoracic artery grafts (where the proximal end of the thoracic artery is excised from its origin from the subclavian artery and re-anastomosed with the ascending aorta).
Venous vs Arterial Conduits
Saphenous vein grafts have poorer patency rates than arterial grafts, but are more available, as the patients can have multiple segments of the saphenous vein used to bypass different arteries.
LITA grafts are longer-lasting than vein grafts, both because the artery is more robust than a vein and because, being already connected to the arterial tree, the LITA need only be grafted at one end. The LITA is usually grafted to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) because of its superior long-term patency when compared to saphenous vein grafts.[2][3]
Impact of Harvesting Method on Saphenous Vein Graft Patency
The method of harvesting vein grafts may be associated with late vein graft patency at 12-18 months.[4] In a non-randomized subgroup analysis from the PREVENT IV study, harvesting of vein-grafts with the use of endoscopy (endoscopic harvesting) was associated with a higher rate of saphenous vein graft failure compared with open harvesting of the veins under direct visualization (46.7% vs. 38.0%, P<0.001 at 12-18 months). Likewise, clinical outcomes were worse at 3 years: use of endoscopy was associated with higher rates of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization (20.2% vs. 17.4%; p=0.04), death or myocardial infarction (9.3% vs. 7.6%; p=0.01), and death (7.4% vs. 5.8%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.04; p=0.005). Although these observational data are provocative, further randomized clinical trials would be needed to compare the safety and effectiveness of the two harvesting technique.
Pharmacotherapy
In a relatively modest sized study, there was a significant improvement in SVG patency to 91.6% (219/239) among patients treated with both aspirin and clopidogrel versus 85.7% (198/231) in those patients treated with aspirin alone (relative risk: 1.707; 95% confidence interval: 1.010 to 2.886; multivariat p = 0.043)[5]
Impact of Initial CABG Results and Runoff
Greater runoff, and higher mean graft flow have been associated with improved SVG patency, whereas the pulsatile index has been associated with worse patency[6].
Potential for Pre-Operative SVG Failure
It should be noted that studies of SVGs that are not implanted show that about 1% of veins are already stenosed by > 50% before implantation[7].
References
- ↑ Campeau L, Enjalbert M, Lespérance J, Bourassa MG, Kwiterovich P, Wacholder S, Sniderman A (1984). "The relation of risk factors to the development of atherosclerosis in saphenous-vein bypass grafts and the progression of disease in the native circulation. A study 10 years after aortocoronary bypass surgery". The New England Journal of Medicine. 311 (21): 1329–32. doi:10.1056/NEJM198411223112101. PMID 6333635. Retrieved 2010-11-09. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Kitamura S, Kawachi K, Kawata T, Kobayashi S, Mizuguchi K, Kameda Y, Nishioka H, Hamada Y, Yoshida Y. [Ten-year survival and cardiac event-free rates in Japanese patients with the left anterior descending artery revascularized with internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein graft: a comparative study] Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1996 Mar;97(3):202-9. PMID 8649330.
- ↑ Arima M, Kanoh T, Suzuki T, Kuremoto K, Tanimoto K, Oigawa T, Matsuda S. Serial Angiographic Follow-up Beyond 10 Years After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Circ J. 2005 Aug;69(8):896-902. PMID 16041156. [1].
- ↑ Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED, Harrington RA, Mehta RH, Gibson CM, Mack MJ, Kouchoukos NT, Califf RM, Alexander JH (2009). "Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery". The New England Journal of Medicine. 361 (3): 235–44. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0900708. PMID 19605828. Retrieved 2010-07-12. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Gao G et al. Aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy increases early venous graft patency after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1639–43.
- ↑ Gao G et al. Aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy increases early venous graft patency after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1639–43.
- ↑ Waller BF, Roberts WC (1985). "Remnant saphenous veins after aortocoronary bypass grafting: analysis of 3,394 centimeters of unused vein from 402 patients". The American Journal of Cardiology. 55 (1): 65–71. PMID 3871302. Retrieved 2010-11-09. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help)