Rivaroxaban FDA review of ROCKET AF data: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
An upper bound of the 95% CI of the [[hazard ratio]] was set at 1.38 by the FDA to establish non-inferiority. In no subgroup did the comparison come near the [[non-inferiority]] margin, and non-inferiority was clearly observed in all treatment subgroups and in all forms of analysis. | An upper bound of the 95% CI of the [[hazard ratio]] was set at 1.38 by the FDA to establish non-inferiority. In no subgroup did the comparison come near the [[non-inferiority]] margin, and non-inferiority was clearly observed in all treatment subgroups and in all forms of analysis. | ||
==Primary Endpoint== | ==Primary Efficacy Endpoint== | ||
The primary endpoint was [[stroke]]0 and [[systemic embolization]]. The efficacy in the trial was driven by a reduction in [[hemorrhagic stroke]] and [[systemic embolization]]. | The primary efficacy endpoint was [[stroke]]0 and [[systemic embolization]]. The efficacy in the trial was driven by a reduction in [[hemorrhagic stroke]] and [[systemic embolization]]. | ||
==Secondary Endpoints== | ==Secondary Efficacy Endpoints== | ||
There were fewer non-fatal [[myocardial infarctions]] in the [[Rivaroxaban]] group. | There were fewer non-fatal [[myocardial infarctions]] in the [[Rivaroxaban]] group. | ||
==Safety Endpoint(s)== | |||
There were more major bleeding events in the [[rivaroxaban]] group, however, the risk of fatal bleeds and hemorrhagic strokes was reduced in the [[rivaroxaban]] group. |
Revision as of 12:59, 8 September 2011
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
The FDA conducted an advisory committee review regarding the approvability of rivaroxaban for reduction of stroke and systemic embolization in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation on September 8th, 2011.
Non-Inferiority Margin
An upper bound of the 95% CI of the hazard ratio was set at 1.38 by the FDA to establish non-inferiority. In no subgroup did the comparison come near the non-inferiority margin, and non-inferiority was clearly observed in all treatment subgroups and in all forms of analysis.
Primary Efficacy Endpoint
The primary efficacy endpoint was stroke0 and systemic embolization. The efficacy in the trial was driven by a reduction in hemorrhagic stroke and systemic embolization.
Secondary Efficacy Endpoints
There were fewer non-fatal myocardial infarctions in the Rivaroxaban group.
Safety Endpoint(s)
There were more major bleeding events in the rivaroxaban group, however, the risk of fatal bleeds and hemorrhagic strokes was reduced in the rivaroxaban group.