Deep vein thrombosis diagnostic approach: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{{familytree/end}} | {{familytree/end}} | ||
===Considerations=== | |||
*Positive predictive value for compression ultrasonography is 94 percent (95% CI) | |||
*Venography is used only | |||
**when noninvasive testing is not clinically feasible | |||
**The results are equivocal | |||
*A negative D-dimer assay, as a stand-alone test may be insufficient to rule out DVT, especially in patient with a high venous thromboembolism prevalence. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
Revision as of 15:36, 19 October 2011
Editors-in-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. Associate Editor-In-Chief: Ujjwal Rastogi, MBBS [1]
|
Deep Vein Thrombosis Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Special Scenario |
|
Trials |
|
Case Studies |
|
Deep vein thrombosis diagnostic approach On the Web |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Deep vein thrombosis diagnostic approach |
Overview
| Suspected (Symptomatic) Acute DVT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compression Ultrasonography | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Normal | Inconclusive study | DVT present | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Serial Ultrasound or impedance plethysmography | Venography or MRI | Treatment | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Negative for DVT | DVT present | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DVT Absent | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No Treatment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DVT present | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Treatment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Considerations
- Positive predictive value for compression ultrasonography is 94 percent (95% CI)
- Venography is used only
- when noninvasive testing is not clinically feasible
- The results are equivocal
- A negative D-dimer assay, as a stand-alone test may be insufficient to rule out DVT, especially in patient with a high venous thromboembolism prevalence.