Aortic dissection diagnosis: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Robot: Changing Category:DiseaseState to Category:Disease) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:Aortic dissection}} | {{Template:Aortic dissection}} | ||
{{CMG}} | {{CMG}}; '''Associate Editor-In-Chief:''' {{CZ}} | ||
'''Associate Editor-In-Chief:''' {{CZ}} | |||
==Overview== | |||
==Diagnosis== | ==Diagnosis== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 11: | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
{{WH}} | {{WH}} | ||
{{WS}} | {{WS}} | ||
Revision as of 17:56, 17 August 2012
|
Aortic dissection Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Special Scenarios |
|
Case Studies |
|
|
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor-In-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]
Overview
Diagnosis
In a study by Spittell et.al. at the Mayo, the initial clinical impression of dissection (after history, physical, chest x-ray and echocardiography) was made in 62% of patients. A correct diagnosis was more commonly made in patients with type I or type II dissections. The differential is quite broad and depends upon the location of dissection, aortic root / coronary involvement, and obstruction of aortic or aortic branch blood flow.