Neurocardiogenic syncope tilt table testing: Difference between revisions
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Depending on patient selection and protocol, the test has high sensitivity (upto 80%) but low specificity. | Depending on patient selection and protocol, the test has high sensitivity (upto 80%) but low specificity. | ||
==[[Tilt table test]]== | |||
To read the main article on Tilt table test, click '''[[Tilt table test|here]]'''. | |||
==Reference== | ==Reference== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} |
Revision as of 02:09, 21 May 2012
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Neurocardiogenic Syncope Microchapters |
Differentiating Neurocardiogenic Syncope From Other Diseases |
---|
Diagnosis |
Treatment |
Neurocardiogenic syncope tilt table testing On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Neurocardiogenic syncope tilt table testing |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Neurocardiogenic syncope tilt table testing |
Overview
The head-up tilt table test mimics the orthostatic stress. The orthostatic stress results in maximal venous pooling, central hypovolaemia and peripheral provocation of vasovagal syncope.
Role in diagnosis of Neurocardiogenic Shock
In-spite of the test being positive in patients with neurocardiogenic shock, it is not considered as a gold standard for diagnosis because of its limited sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility.[1]
Depending on patient selection and protocol, the test has high sensitivity (upto 80%) but low specificity.
Tilt table test
To read the main article on Tilt table test, click here.
Reference
- ↑ Parry SW, Kenny RA (1999). "Tilt table testing in the diagnosis of unexplained syncope". QJM. 92 (11): 623–9. PMID 10542301. Retrieved 2012-05-20. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help)