Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin CT: Difference between revisions
Created page with "{{Squamous cell carcinoma}} {{CMG}}; '''Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:''' Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [mailto:agovi@perfuse.org], [[User..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{CMG}}; '''Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:''' [[User:Aditya Govindavarjhulla|Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S.]] [mailto:agovi@perfuse.org], [[User:Raviteja Reddy Guddeti|Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S.]] [mailto:rgudetti@perfuse.org] | {{CMG}}; '''Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:''' [[User:Aditya Govindavarjhulla|Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S.]] [mailto:agovi@perfuse.org], [[User:Raviteja Reddy Guddeti|Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S.]] [mailto:rgudetti@perfuse.org] | ||
==CT Scan== | |||
CT scan is done to mainly detect | CT scan is done to mainly detect | ||
* Extent of disease. Its very much useful in cases of lesions of oral cavity , tongue, esophagus. | * Extent of disease. Its very much useful in cases of lesions of oral cavity , tongue, esophagus. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Accuracy of nodal staging with CT scan is fairly good compared to clinical staging, helping in deciding treatment modalities. | Accuracy of nodal staging with CT scan is fairly good compared to clinical staging, helping in deciding treatment modalities. | ||
'''Advantages:''' | '''Advantages:''' | ||
*CT is | *CT is less expensive than MRI. | ||
*CT is more sensitive in finding involvement of bones, cartilages. | *CT is more sensitive in finding involvement of bones, cartilages. | ||
'''Disadvantages''' | '''Disadvantages''' | ||
*Exposure to radiation is main concern. | *Exposure to radiation is main concern. | ||
*Safer for patients with implants. | *Safer for patients with implants. | ||
*Less sensitive for soft tissue involvement | *Less sensitive for soft tissue involvement.<ref name="pmid12520232">{{cite journal |author=Yamamoto H |title=[The report of the electromagnetic interference at the medical facilities (questionnaire for the enterprise)] |language=Japanese |journal=Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi |volume=58 |issue=5 |pages=634–9 |year=2002 |month=May |pmid=12520232 |doi= |url=}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 16:43, 14 June 2012
|
Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin Microchapters |
|
Differentiating Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin from other Diseases |
|---|
|
Diagnosis |
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin CT On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin CT |
|
Directions to Hospitals Treating Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin CT |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2], Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [3]
CT Scan
CT scan is done to mainly detect
- Extent of disease. Its very much useful in cases of lesions of oral cavity , tongue, esophagus.
- Metastatis to regional lymph nodes can be assessed.
- Perineural invasion in lesions near the nerves especially in oral cavity,nasopharyngeal tumors.
Accuracy of nodal staging with CT scan is fairly good compared to clinical staging, helping in deciding treatment modalities. Advantages:
- CT is less expensive than MRI.
- CT is more sensitive in finding involvement of bones, cartilages.
Disadvantages
- Exposure to radiation is main concern.
- Safer for patients with implants.
- Less sensitive for soft tissue involvement.[1]
References