Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin CT: Difference between revisions
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{CMG}}; '''Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:''' [[User:Aditya Govindavarjhulla|Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S.]] [mailto:agovi@perfuse.org], [[User:Raviteja Reddy Guddeti|Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S.]] [mailto:rgudetti@perfuse.org] | {{CMG}}; '''Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:''' [[User:Aditya Govindavarjhulla|Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S.]] [mailto:agovi@perfuse.org], [[User:Raviteja Reddy Guddeti|Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S.]] [mailto:rgudetti@perfuse.org] | ||
==CT Scan== | == CT Scan == | ||
CT scan is done to mainly detect | CT scan is done to mainly detect | ||
* Extent of disease. Its very much useful in cases of lesions of oral cavity , tongue, esophagus. | * Extent of disease. Its very much useful in cases of lesions of oral cavity , tongue, esophagus. | ||
* Metastatis to regional lymph nodes can be assessed. | * Metastatis to regional lymph nodes can be assessed. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
'''Advantages:''' | '''Advantages:''' | ||
*CT is less expensive than MRI. | |||
*CT is more sensitive in finding involvement of bones, cartilages. | * CT is less expensive than MRI. | ||
*Safer for patients with implants. | * CT is more sensitive in finding involvement of bones, cartilages. | ||
* Safer for patients with implants. | |||
'''Disadvantages''' | '''Disadvantages''' | ||
*Less sensitive for soft tissue involvement.<ref name="pmid12520232">{{cite journal |author=Yamamoto H |title=[The report of the electromagnetic interference at the medical facilities (questionnaire for the enterprise)] |language=Japanese |journal=Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi |volume=58 |issue=5 |pages=634–9 |year=2002 |month=May |pmid=12520232 |doi= |url=}}</ref> | * Exposure to radiation is main concern. | ||
* Less sensitive for soft tissue involvement.<ref name="pmid12520232">{{cite journal |author=Yamamoto H |title=[The report of the electromagnetic interference at the medical facilities (questionnaire for the enterprise)] |language=Japanese |journal=Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi |volume=58 |issue=5 |pages=634–9 |year=2002 |month=May |pmid=12520232 |doi= |url=}}</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 21:11, 15 June 2012
|
Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin Microchapters |
|
Differentiating Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin from other Diseases |
|---|
|
Diagnosis |
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin CT On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin CT |
|
Directions to Hospitals Treating Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin CT |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aditya Govindavarjhulla, M.B.B.S. [2], Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [3]
CT Scan
CT scan is done to mainly detect
- Extent of disease. Its very much useful in cases of lesions of oral cavity , tongue, esophagus.
- Metastatis to regional lymph nodes can be assessed.
- Perineural invasion in lesions near the nerves especially in oral cavity,nasopharyngeal tumors.
Accuracy of nodal staging with CT scan is fairly good compared to clinical staging, helping in deciding treatment modalities.
Advantages:
- CT is less expensive than MRI.
- CT is more sensitive in finding involvement of bones, cartilages.
- Safer for patients with implants.
Disadvantages
- Exposure to radiation is main concern.
- Less sensitive for soft tissue involvement.[1]
References