Aortic dissection MRI: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
MRI is the imaging modality of choice in the assessment of longstanding aortic disease in a patient who has chronic chest pain who is hemodynamically stable or for the evaluation of a chronic dissection. | |||
== MRI == | == MRI == | ||
*[[Magnetic resonance imaging]] (MRI) is currently the [[gold standard (test)|gold standard test]] for the detection and assessment of aortic dissection, with a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 98%. | *[[Magnetic resonance imaging]] (MRI) is currently the [[gold standard (test)|gold standard test]] for the detection and assessment of aortic dissection, with a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 98%. | ||
*An MRI examination of the aorta will produce a three-dimensional reconstruction of the aorta, allowing the physician to determine the location of the intimal tear, the involvement of branch vessels, and locate any secondary tears. | *An MRI examination of the aorta will produce a three-dimensional reconstruction of the aorta, allowing the physician to determine the location of the intimal tear, the involvement of branch vessels, and locate any secondary tears. | ||
*It is a non-invasive test, does not require the use of iodinated contrast material, and can detect and quantitate the degree of [[aortic insufficiency]]. | *It is a non-invasive test, does not require the use of iodinated contrast material, and can detect and quantitate the degree of [[aortic insufficiency]]. | ||
*The disadvantage of the MRI scan in the face of aortic dissection is that it has limited availability and is often located only in | *The disadvantage of the MRI scan in the face of aortic dissection is that it has limited availability and is often located only in larger hospitals, and the scan is relatively time consuming. | ||
*Due to the high intensity of the magnetic waves used during MRI, an MRI scan is contraindicated in individuals with metallic implants. In addition, many individuals | *Due to the high intensity of the magnetic waves used during MRI, an MRI scan is contraindicated in individuals with metallic implants. *In addition, many individuals develop [[claustrophobia]] while in the MRI scanning tube. | ||
<div align="left"> | <div align="left"> | ||
Revision as of 00:36, 30 October 2012
|
Aortic dissection Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Special Scenarios |
|
Case Studies |
|
|
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] ; Associate Editor-In-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]
Overview
MRI is the imaging modality of choice in the assessment of longstanding aortic disease in a patient who has chronic chest pain who is hemodynamically stable or for the evaluation of a chronic dissection.
MRI
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the gold standard test for the detection and assessment of aortic dissection, with a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 98%.
- An MRI examination of the aorta will produce a three-dimensional reconstruction of the aorta, allowing the physician to determine the location of the intimal tear, the involvement of branch vessels, and locate any secondary tears.
- It is a non-invasive test, does not require the use of iodinated contrast material, and can detect and quantitate the degree of aortic insufficiency.
- The disadvantage of the MRI scan in the face of aortic dissection is that it has limited availability and is often located only in larger hospitals, and the scan is relatively time consuming.
- Due to the high intensity of the magnetic waves used during MRI, an MRI scan is contraindicated in individuals with metallic implants. *In addition, many individuals develop claustrophobia while in the MRI scanning tube.
-
MRI of an aortic dissection. 1 Aorta descendens with dissection. 2 Aortic isthmus.
