Brugada syndrome classification: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:




[[Image:Brugada 3.1.jpg|center|thumb|400px|right|ECG pattern in Brugada syndrome. According to a recent consensus document, type 1 ST segment elevation either spontaneously present or induced with [[Ajmaline]]/[[Flecainide]] test is considered diagnostic. Type 1 and 2 may lead to suspicion but drug challenge is required for diagnosis. The ECGs in the right and left panels are from the same patient before (right panel, type 1) and after (left panel, type 1) endovenous administration of 1 mg/kg of Ajmaline during 10 minutes.]]
[[Image:Brugada 3.1.jpg|left|thumb|400px|right|ECG pattern in Brugada syndrome. According to a recent consensus document, type 1 ST segment elevation either spontaneously present or induced with [[Ajmaline]]/[[Flecainide]] test is considered diagnostic. Type 1 and 2 may lead to suspicion but drug challenge is required for diagnosis. The ECGs in the right and left panels are from the same patient before (right panel, type 1) and after (left panel, type 1) endovenous administration of 1 mg/kg of Ajmaline during 10 minutes.]]


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 13:38, 31 August 2012

Brugada syndrome Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Differentiating Brugada syndrome from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Examples of Type I Brugada Syndrome

Chest X Ray

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Electrophysiologic Studies

Genetic Testing

Treatment

Treatment

Drugs to Avoid

Drugs to Preferably Avoid

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Brugada syndrome classification On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Brugada syndrome classification

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Brugada syndrome classification

CDC on Brugada syndrome classification

Brugada syndrome classification in the news

Blogs on Brugada syndrome classification

Directions to Hospitals Treating Brugada syndrome

Risk calculators and risk factors for Brugada syndrome classification

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

Classification

  1. Type 1 ST segment elevation is diagnostic of Brugada syndrome and is characterized by a coved ST-segment elevation ≥2 mm (0.2 mV) followed by a negative T wave.
  2. Type 2 ST-segment elevation has a saddleback appearance with a high take-off ST-segment elevation of ≥2 mm followed by a trough displaying ≥1 mm ST elevation followed by either a positive or biphasic T wave.
  3. Type 3 ST-segment elevation has either a saddleback or coved appearance with an ST-segment elevation of <1 mm.


File:Brugada 3.1.jpg
ECG pattern in Brugada syndrome. According to a recent consensus document, type 1 ST segment elevation either spontaneously present or induced with Ajmaline/Flecainide test is considered diagnostic. Type 1 and 2 may lead to suspicion but drug challenge is required for diagnosis. The ECGs in the right and left panels are from the same patient before (right panel, type 1) and after (left panel, type 1) endovenous administration of 1 mg/kg of Ajmaline during 10 minutes.

References

Template:WH Template:WS