Deep vein thrombosis diagnostic approach: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Diagnosis Approach== | ==Diagnosis Approach== | ||
A number of invasive (venography) and non-invasive tests (impedance plethysmography, compression ultrasonography, D-dimer testing) are available for diagnosis. Compression ultrasonography is the noninvasive diagnosis of choice for patients with a first episode of suspected DVT. | A number of invasive (venography) and non-invasive tests (impedance plethysmography, compression ultrasonography, D-dimer testing) are available for diagnosis. Compression ultrasonography is the noninvasive diagnosis of choice for patients with a first episode of a suspected DVT. | ||
In a patient population with high prevalence of [[VTE]], a negative [[D-dimer]] assay may be insufficient to rule out DVT as a single test, | In a patient population with a high prevalence of [[VTE]], a negative [[D-dimer]] assay may be insufficient to rule out DVT as a single test, furthermore, not all D-dimer assays are validated for this. However, a D-dimer level <500 ng/mL by ELISA along with a low clinical probability ([[Wells score calculator for DVT|Wells score]])<ref name="pmid10744147">{{cite journal |author=Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J |title=Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer |journal=Thromb. Haemost. |volume=83 |issue=3 |pages=416–20 |year=2000 |month=March |pmid=10744147 |doi=|url=http://www.schattauer.de/index.php?id=1268&L=1&pii=th00030416&no_cache=1 |accessdate=2012-05-01}}</ref> or other negative non-invasive tests may be useful in excluding DVT, without doing ultrasound. | ||
Compression ultrasonography has a positive predictive value of 94 percent (95% CI: 87-98 percent). If the clinical suspicion of DVT is high even after a negative CUS, a repeat study should be done within a week. Complete lower extremity ultrasonography may eliminate the need for repeat testing, but a positive CUS demands user expertise, and requires specialized instrumentation. The algorithm below presents a possible diagnostic approach. | Compression ultrasonography has a positive predictive value of 94 percent (95% CI: 87-98 percent). If the clinical suspicion of DVT is high even after a negative CUS, a repeat study should be done within a week. Complete lower extremity ultrasonography may eliminate the need for repeat testing, but a positive CUS demands user expertise, and requires specialized instrumentation. The algorithm below presents a possible diagnostic approach. | ||
[[Image: DVT_diagnosis.jpg]] | [[Image: DVT_diagnosis.jpg]] | ||
CUS stands for Compression Ultrasonography; [[D-dimer]] is the highly sensitive assay. | CUS stands for Compression Ultrasonography; [[D-dimer]] is the highly sensitive assay. | ||
Clinical judgement and local availability should be considered in patients with moderate probability of [[DVT]]. CUS may be preferred in patients with comorbid conditions associated with elevated D-dimer levels. | Clinical judgement and local availability should be considered in patients with a moderate probability of [[DVT]]. CUS may be preferred in patients with comorbid conditions associated with elevated D-dimer levels. | ||
Adapted from ACCP guidelines<ref name="pmid22315267">{{cite journal |author=Bates SM, Jaeschke R, Stevens SM, ''et al.'' |title=Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines |journal=Chest |volume=141 |issue=2 Suppl |pages=e351S–418S |year=2012 |month=February |pmid=22315267 |doi=10.1378/chest.11-2299 |url=}}</ref>. | Adapted from ACCP guidelines<ref name="pmid22315267">{{cite journal |author=Bates SM, Jaeschke R, Stevens SM, ''et al.'' |title=Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines |journal=Chest |volume=141 |issue=2 Suppl |pages=e351S–418S |year=2012 |month=February |pmid=22315267 |doi=10.1378/chest.11-2299 |url=}}</ref>. | ||
| Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
* Whole-leg ultrasound may be preferred in those who have severe symptoms of calf DVT or are unable to come for serial testing. | * Whole-leg ultrasound may be preferred in those who have severe symptoms of calf DVT or are unable to come for serial testing. | ||
* CT scan venography, MR venography, or MR direct thrombus imaging may be used in those patients in whom ultrasound is not practical (leg cast, excessive edema) or non-diagnostic. | * CT scan venography, MR venography, or MR direct thrombus imaging may be used in those patients in whom ultrasound is not practical (leg cast, excessive edema) or non-diagnostic. | ||
* The diagnostic approach may be modified based on clinical condition of the patient and [[Deep vein thrombosis specific situations|specific situations]]. | * The diagnostic approach may be modified based on clinical condition of the patient and [[Deep vein thrombosis specific situations|specific situations]]. | ||
Revision as of 16:12, 12 October 2012
Editor(s)-In-Chief: The APEX Trial Investigators, C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2] ; Kashish Goel, M.D.; Assistant Editor(s)-In-Chief: Justine Cadet
|
Deep Vein Thrombosis Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Special Scenario |
|
Trials |
|
Case Studies |
|
Deep vein thrombosis diagnostic approach On the Web |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Deep vein thrombosis diagnostic approach |
Overview
Diagnosis Approach
A number of invasive (venography) and non-invasive tests (impedance plethysmography, compression ultrasonography, D-dimer testing) are available for diagnosis. Compression ultrasonography is the noninvasive diagnosis of choice for patients with a first episode of a suspected DVT.
In a patient population with a high prevalence of VTE, a negative D-dimer assay may be insufficient to rule out DVT as a single test, furthermore, not all D-dimer assays are validated for this. However, a D-dimer level <500 ng/mL by ELISA along with a low clinical probability (Wells score)[1] or other negative non-invasive tests may be useful in excluding DVT, without doing ultrasound.
Compression ultrasonography has a positive predictive value of 94 percent (95% CI: 87-98 percent). If the clinical suspicion of DVT is high even after a negative CUS, a repeat study should be done within a week. Complete lower extremity ultrasonography may eliminate the need for repeat testing, but a positive CUS demands user expertise, and requires specialized instrumentation. The algorithm below presents a possible diagnostic approach.
CUS stands for Compression Ultrasonography; D-dimer is the highly sensitive assay. Clinical judgement and local availability should be considered in patients with a moderate probability of DVT. CUS may be preferred in patients with comorbid conditions associated with elevated D-dimer levels.
Adapted from ACCP guidelines[2].
Considerations
- Whole-leg ultrasound may be preferred in those who have severe symptoms of calf DVT or are unable to come for serial testing.
- CT scan venography, MR venography, or MR direct thrombus imaging may be used in those patients in whom ultrasound is not practical (leg cast, excessive edema) or non-diagnostic.
- The diagnostic approach may be modified based on clinical condition of the patient and specific situations.
References
- ↑ Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie AG, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J (2000). "Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer". Thromb. Haemost. 83 (3): 416–20. PMID 10744147. Retrieved 2012-05-01. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Bates SM, Jaeschke R, Stevens SM; et al. (2012). "Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines". Chest. 141 (2 Suppl): e351S–418S. doi:10.1378/chest.11-2299. PMID 22315267. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help)