Phimosis overview: Difference between revisions
m (Bot: Removing from Primary care) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
{{WikiDoc Help Menu}} | |||
{{WikiDoc Sources}} | |||
[[Category:Andrology]] | [[Category:Andrology]] | ||
[[Category:Circumcision debate]] | [[Category:Circumcision debate]] | ||
[[Category:Penis]] | [[Category:Penis]] | ||
[[Category:Urology]] | [[Category:Urology]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:42, 29 July 2020
Phimosis Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Phimosis overview On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Phimosis overview |
Steven C. Campbell, M.D., Ph.D.
Overview
Phimosis is a medical condition in which the foreskin of the penis of a male cannot be fully retracted. The word derives from the Greek phimos (Template:Unicode, "muzzle"). The term is confusing because it is used to denote both a physiological stage of development (i.e. not a disease), and a pathological condition (i.e. a condition that causes problems for a person). Elasticity and ambiguity of definition are especially common when referring to infants. Conflicting incidence reports and widely varying post-neonatal circumcision rates reflect looseness in the diagnostic criteria.[1][2] Phimosis has become a topic of contention in circumcision debates[3]
References
- ↑ Cantu Jr. S. Phimosis and paraphimosis emedicine.com. Excellent Emedicine overview.
- ↑ Dewan PA.Treating phimosis Med J Austral 178:148-150, 2003. Discussion of physiological and pathological phimosis in childhood and use of diagnosis to justify surgery for parents' sake. Pictures of infant penises with and without phimosis.
- ↑ Multiple authors."Matters arising" Med J Austral 178:587-90, 2003. Letters to the Med J Austral debating the phimosis statistics of Spilsbury and the treatment recommendations of Dewan from both proponents and opponents of circumcision.