Otitis media medical therapy: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 40: Line 40:
|}
|}
|}
|}


{| style="background: #FFFFFF;"
{| style="background: #FFFFFF;"

Revision as of 22:57, 28 January 2014

Otitis media Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Pathophysiology

Causes

Classification

Differentiating Otitis Media from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

CT or MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Case Studies

Case #1

Otitis media medical therapy On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Otitis media medical therapy

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA onOtitis media medical therapy

CDC on Otitis media medical therapy

media medical therapy in the news

on Otitis media medical therapy

Directions to Hospitals Treating Otitis media

Risk calculators and risk factors for Otitis media medical therapy

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [3]

Medical Therapy

Acute Otitis Media

Treatment of acute otitis media is controversial. Much of the controversy centers around the difficulty of distinguishing viral infection from bacterial infection and the fact that viral infection can progress to bacterial infection at any time. Primary care providers, such as general practitioners and pediatricians, often have a monocular otoscope and perhaps a tympanometer as their only diagnostic tools, which makes this distinction difficult, especially if the canal is small and there is wax in the ear that obscures a clear view of the eardrum. Also, an upset child's crying can cause the eardrum to look inflamed due to causing distention of the small blood vessels on it, mimicking the redness associated with otitis media. Because of a tradition of inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics for viral acute otitis media, their use has recently been condemned by many primary care practitioners for most cases of acute otitis media. Ear specialists tend to disagree with this philosophy and promote efforts to distinguish between viral and bacterial infection, so as to optimize treatment results by giving antibiotics only for bacterial infection. Acute bacterial otitis media can cause pain that leads to sleepless nights for both children and parents, can cause eardrum perforations, not all of which heal, and can spread to cause mastoiditis and/or meningitis, brain abscess, and even death if a severe infection goes untreated long enough. High fever can occur and can cause febrile seizures. Appropriate antibiotic administration prevents most such complications. On the other hand, it is generally agreed that acute otitis media that is purely viral will usually resolve without antibiotic treatment, although associated persistent middle ear effusions may require medical intervention.[1][2][3]

Many guidelines now suggest deferring the start of antibiotics for one to three days[4] avoiding the need for antibiotics for two out of three children[5] without adverse effect on longterm outcomes for those whose treatment is deferred.[6] First line antibiotic treatment, if warranted, is amoxicillin. If the bacteria is resistant, then amoxicillin-clavulanate or another penicillin derivative plus beta lactamase inhibitor is used.

Antibiotics Used in the Treatment of Otitis Media
Preferred Regimen
Amoxicillin 80 to 90 mg per kg per day, given orally in two divided doses
Recurrent or persistent acute otitis media, those used amoxicillin, or antibiotics within the previous month, or with concurrent purulent conjunctivitis
Amoxicillin-clavulanate 90 mg of amoxicillin per kg per day; 6.4 mg of clavulanate per kg per day, given orally in two divided doses
For patients with penicillin allergy
Azithromycin 30 mg per kg, given orally one dose
For recurrent acute otitis media
Azithromycin 20 mg per kg once daily, given orally x 3 days
For penicillin allergy type 1 hypersensitivity
Azithromycin 5 to 10 mg per kg once daily, given orally x 5 days
For patients with penicillin allergy excluding type 1 hypersensitivity
Cefdinir 14 mg per kg per day, given orally in one or two doses
OR
Cefpodoxime 30 mg per kg once daily, given orally
OR
Ceftriaxone 50 mg per kg once daily, IM or IV. One dose for initial episode of otitis media, three doses for recurrent infections
OR
Cefuroxime 30 mg per kg per day, given orally in two divided doses
OR
Clarithromycin 15 mg per kg per day, given orally in three divided doses
OR
Clindamycin 30 to 40 mg per kg per day, given orally in four divided doses
Topical agents
ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone 3 drops twice daily
OR
Ofloxacin 5 drops twice daily (10 drops in patients older than 12 years)
OR
Hydrocortisone/neomycin/polymyxin B 4 drops three to four times daily

Chronic Otitis Media with Effusion

In chronic cases or with effusions present for months, surgery is sometimes performed. It is possible to use the Valsalva maneuver to reestablish middle ear ventilation, although repeated use of the Valsalva maneuver can cause infected matter to enter the eye cavity and cause conjunctivitis.

Alternative Therapies

Alternatives to conventional medical approaches include chiropractic and osteopathic spinal manipulations, targeted to relieve muscle tension to enhance lymphatic flow and allow normal opening of the Eustachian tube. Such alternatives are becoming increasingly widely used. Otitis Media has also been found to respond to homeopathic remedies.[7] Eardoc treatment reduces the fluids in the middle ear by opening the Eustachian tube. Its efficiency can be viewed and tested with a tympanometer.

References

  1. Damoiseaux R, van Balen F, Hoes A, Verheij T, de Melker R (2000). "Primary care based randomised, double blind trial of amoxicillin versus placebo for acute otitis media in children aged under 2 years". BMJ. 320 (7231): 350–4. PMID 10657332.
  2. Arroll B (2005). "Antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: an overview of Cochrane reviews". Respir Med. 99 (3): 255–61. PMID 15733498.
  3. Rovers MM, Glasziou P, Appelman CL, Burke P, McCormick DP, Damoiseaux RA, Gaboury I, Little P, Hoes AW. (2006). "Antibiotics for acute otitis media: a meta-analysis with individual patient data". Lancet. 368 (9545): 1429–35. PMID 17055944.
  4. Damoiseaux R (2005). "Antibiotic treatment for acute otitis media: time to think again". CMAJ. 172 (5): 657–8. PMID 15738492.
  5. Marchetti F, Ronfani L, Nibali S, Tamburlini G (2005). "Delayed prescription may reduce the use of antibiotics for acute otitis media: a prospective observational study in primary care". Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 159 (7): 679–84. PMID 15997003.
  6. Little P, Moore M, Warner G, Dunleavy J, Williamson I (2006). "Longer term outcomes from a randomised trial of prescribing strategies in otitis media". Br J Gen Pract. 56 (524): 176–82. PMID 16536957.
  7. Michael A. Schmidt (2003). Childhood Ear Infections: A Parent's Guide to Alternative Treatments. North Atlantic Books. ISBN 1556434421. [1] [2]

Template:WH Template:WS