Sandbox2: Difference between revisions
Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
{{familytree | | | |!| | | | | |!| | | | }} | {{familytree | | | |!| | | | | |!| | | | }} | ||
{{familytree | | | E01 | | | | E02 | | | | E01= <div style="float: left; text-align: left"> ❑ Assess the [[ECG]] </div>| | {{familytree | | | E01 | | | | E02 | | | | E01= <div style="float: left; text-align: left"> ❑ Assess the [[ECG]] </div>| | ||
E02= <div style="float: left; text-align: left; width: 24em"> | E02= <div style="float: left; text-align: left; width: 24em"><br> | ||
<br> | |||
❑ [[Catheter ablation]] ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence B]])<br> | ❑ [[Catheter ablation]] ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence B]])<br> | ||
❑ Urgent electrical [[cardioversion]] ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence C]])<br> | ❑ Urgent electrical [[cardioversion]] ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence C]])<br> | ||
Line 136: | Line 135: | ||
{{familytree | F01 | | F02 | | | | | F01= '''Orthodromic AVRT'''| F02= '''Antidromic AVRT'''}} | {{familytree | F01 | | F02 | | | | | F01= '''Orthodromic AVRT'''| F02= '''Antidromic AVRT'''}} | ||
{{familytree | |!| | | |!| | | | | |}} | {{familytree | |!| | | |!| | | | | |}} | ||
{{familytree | G01 | | G02 | | | | G01= <div style="float: left; text-align: left; width: 24em; padding:1em;"> '''Treatment | {{familytree | G01 | | G02 | | | | G01= <div style="float: left; text-align: left; width: 24em; padding:1em;"> '''Treatment'''<br> | ||
❑ Use [[vagal maneuvers]] ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence B]])<br> | ❑ Use [[vagal maneuvers]] ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence B]])<br> | ||
:❑ [[Carotid sinus massage]] <br> | :❑ [[Carotid sinus massage]] <br> | ||
:❑ [[Valsalva maneuver]] <br> | :❑ [[Valsalva maneuver]] <br> | ||
<br>''If not effective initiate IV AV nodal blocking agent''<br><br> | <br>''If not effective initiate IV AV nodal blocking agent''<br><br> | ||
❑ Administer [[adenosine]], 6 mg (initial dose) that could be followed by 12 mg if initial dose not effective | ❑ Administer [[adenosine]], 6 mg (initial dose) that could be followed by 12 mg if initial dose not effective <br> | ||
:❑ Administer IV followed by 10 cc of saline solution ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence A]])<br> | :❑ Administer IV followed by 10 cc of saline solution ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence A]])<br> | ||
:<span style="font-size:85%;color:red">Contraindications: second- or third-degree A-V block, sinus node disease</span><br> | :<span style="font-size:85%;color:red">Contraindications: second- or third-degree A-V block, sinus node disease</span><br> | ||
<br>''If not effective''<br><br> | <br>''If not effective''<br><br> | ||
❑ Administer [[verapamil]], given in boluses of 5 mg every two to three minutes up to cumulative 15 mg ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence A]]) | ❑ Administer [[verapamil]], given in boluses of 5 mg every two to three minutes up to cumulative 15 mg ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence A]])<br> | ||
:❑ Additional ECG monitoring should be perforemed in patients with renal insufficiency | :❑ Additional ECG monitoring should be perforemed in patients with renal insufficiency<br> | ||
:❑ In cirrhosis, reduce dose to 20% and 50% of normal<br> | :❑ In cirrhosis, reduce dose to 20% and 50% of normal<br> | ||
:<span style="font-size:85%;color:red">Contraindications: hypotension (systolic pressure less than 90 mm Hg) or cardiogenic shock, patients with known hypersensitivity to verapamil hydrochloride</span><br> | :<span style="font-size:85%;color:red">Contraindications: hypotension (systolic pressure less than 90 mm Hg) or cardiogenic shock, patients with known hypersensitivity to verapamil hydrochloride</span><br> | ||
<br>''If not effective''<br><br> | <br>''If not effective''<br><br> | ||
❑ Administer [[procainamide]], give intravenusly 20 to 50 mg/minute until the arrythmia is controlled or reach 17 mg/kg.<br> | ❑ Administer [[procainamide]], give intravenusly 20 to 50 mg/minute until the arrythmia is controlled or reach 17 mg/kg.<br> | ||
:❑ Must monitor blood pressure every 5 to 10 minnutes ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence B]]) | :❑ Must monitor blood pressure every 5 to 10 minnutes ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence B]]) <br> | ||
:❑ Reduce the loading dose to 12 mg/kg in severe renal impairment | :❑ Reduce the loading dose to 12 mg/kg in severe renal impairment<br> | ||
:❑ Reduce the dosage to 50% in hepatic impaiment<br> | :❑ Reduce the dosage to 50% in hepatic impaiment<br> | ||
:<span style="font-size:85%;color:red">Contraindications: complete heart block, lupus erythematosus, idiosyncratic hypersensitivity, torsades de pointes</span><br> | :<span style="font-size:85%;color:red">Contraindications: complete heart block, lupus erythematosus, idiosyncratic hypersensitivity, torsades de pointes</span><br> | ||
</div> | | </div> | | ||
G02= <div style="float: left; text-align: left; width: 24em; padding:1em;"> '''Treatment | G02= <div style="float: left; text-align: left; width: 24em; padding:1em;"> '''Treatment'''<br> | ||
❑ Administer: | ❑ Administer: | ||
:❑ [[ibutilide]] is the prefered treatment, 1 mg in an infusion over 10 minutes ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence B]])<br> | :❑ [[ibutilide]] is the prefered treatment, 1 mg in an infusion over 10 minutes ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|class I, level of evidence B]])<br> |
Revision as of 20:54, 24 March 2014
.
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome Resident Survival Guide Microchapters |
---|
Overview |
Causes |
Diagnosis |
Management |
Do's |
Don'ts |
Overview
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW) is a syndrome of pre-excitation of the ventricles of the heart due to an accessory pathway known as the Bundle of Kent. The diagnosis is made when a patient with pre-existing WPW patern in the ECG, developes an arrythmia which involves an accessory pathway. The treatment is focused on recovering sinus rythm. Atrial Fibrillation in a patient with WPW is lifethretening and should be managed urgently.
Causes
Life Threatening Causes
Life-threatening causes include conditions which result in death or permanent disability within 24 hours if left untreated. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome can be a life-threatening condition and must be treated as such irrespective of the underlying cause.
Common Causes
WPW is a congenic disease
Diagnosis
Shown below is an algorithm summarizing the initial approach to Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome according to the 2003 ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias.[1]
AVRT: AV reentrant tachycardia
Characterize the symptoms: ❑ Asymptomatic | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Identify possible triggers: ❑ Infection | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Examine the patient: ❑ Patient may apear cool and diaphoretic | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Order studies: ❑ ECG | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Orthodromic AVRT The impulse travels from the atrium to the ventricle through the AV node and returns to the atrium through the accessory pathway. 90-95% of WPW EKG findings: | Antidromic AVRT The impulse travels from the atrium to the ventricle through the accessory pathway and from the ventricle to the atrium through the AV node. Less than 10% of WPW EKG findings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Management
Shown below is an algorithm summarizing the initial approach to Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome according to the 2003 ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias.[1]
Initial approach ❑ Determine blood pressure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stable patient | Unstable patient | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
❑ Assess the ECG | ❑ Catheter ablation (class I, level of evidence B) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orthodromic AVRT | Antidromic AVRT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treatment ❑ Use vagal maneuvers (class I, level of evidence B)
| Treatment ❑ Administer:
❑ adenosine should be used with caution because may produce AF
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term Management
Long term management | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Single or infrequent episodes ❑ No treatment (class I, level of evidence C) | Prevention of recurrent AVRT | Asymptomatic ❑ No treatment (class I, level of evidence C) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orthodromic AVRT ❑ class IC antiarrhythmic drugs such as flecainide and propofenone | Antidromic AVRT ❑ Catheter ablation is the prefered therapy
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with Atrial fibrillation
Shown below is an algorithm summarizing the managment of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with Atrial fibrillation according to the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.[2]
Initial approach ❑ Control ventricular response | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stable patient | Unstable patient | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
❑ Restore sinus rythm (class I, level of evidence C)
❑ Avoid AV blocking agents (class III, level of evidence B), such as:
| ❑ Urgent electric cardioversion (class I, level of evidence B) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Do's
❑ Perform catheter ablation of the accessory pathway if possible (class I, level of evidence B).
❑ Electrical cardioversion can be performed in cases of WPW with AF with rapid ventricular response (class II, level of evidence A).
❑ In asymptomatic patients, either no intervantion (class I, level of evidence C) or catheter ablation (class IIb, level of evidence B) could be performed.
❑ Prescribe propofenone over flecainide for the prefvention of recurrence orthodromic AVRT as it has also a mild beta blocking activity.
❑ Schedule exccercise test and electrophysiology tests for the sudden cardiac death statification (class IIa, level of evidence B).
❑ Consider catheter ablation in asymptomatic patients with structural heart disease (class IIb, level of evidence C)
Don'ts
❑ Don't use AV blocking agents in patients with WPW and antidromic AVRT as it will promote promote conduction down the accessory pathway (class III, level of evidence C).[3]
[4]
[5]
❑ Avoid the usage of AV blocking agents in patients with WPW and AF (class III, level of evidence B).
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 "ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias—Executive Summary". Retrieved 15 August 2013.
- ↑ Fuster, V.; Rydén, LE.; Cannom, DS.; Crijns, HJ.; Curtis, AB.; Ellenbogen, KA.; Halperin, JL.; Le Heuzey, JY.; Kay, GN. (2006). "ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society". Circulation. 114 (7): e257–354. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.177292. PMID 16908781. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Garratt, C.; Antoniou, A.; Ward, D.; Camm, AJ. (1989). "Misuse of verapamil in pre-excited atrial fibrillation". Lancet. 1 (8634): 367–9. PMID 2563516. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ Gulamhusein, S.; Ko, P.; Carruthers, SG.; Klein, GJ. (1982). "Acceleration of the ventricular response during atrial fibrillation in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome after verapamil". Circulation. 65 (2): 348–54. PMID 7053894. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help) - ↑ McGovern, B.; Garan, H.; Ruskin, JN. (1986). "Precipitation of cardiac arrest by verapamil in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome". Ann Intern Med. 104 (6): 791–4. PMID 3706931. Unknown parameter
|month=
ignored (help)