Pulmonary embolism special scenario cancer: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(/* Patients With Cancer in the Outpatient Setting (DO NOT EDIT){{cite journal| author=Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, Gutterman DD, Schuünemann HJ, American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Panel| title=Ex...)
Line 57: Line 57:
| colspan="1" style="text-align:center; background:LemonChiffon"| [[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Classification of Recommendations|Class II]]
| colspan="1" style="text-align:center; background:LemonChiffon"| [[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Classification of Recommendations|Class II]]
|-
|-
|bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''1.''' In outpatients with cancer who have no additional risk factors for VTE, we suggest against routine prophylaxis with LMWH or LDUH. ''([[American College of Chest Physicians#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: B]])''<nowiki>"</nowiki>
|bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''1.''' In outpatients with cancer who have no additional risk factors for [[VTE]], we suggest against routine prophylaxis with [[LMWH]] or [[LDUH]]. ''([[American College of Chest Physicians#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: B]])''<nowiki>"</nowiki>
|-
|-
|bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''2.''' In outpatients with solid tumors who have additional risk factors for VTE and who are at low risk of bleeding, we suggest prophylactic-dose LMWH or LDUH over no prophylaxis. ''([[American College of Chest Physicians#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: B]])''<nowiki>"</nowiki>
|bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''2.''' In outpatients with [[solid tumor]]s who have additional risk factors for [[VTE]] and who are at low risk of [[bleeding]], we suggest prophylactic-dose [[LMWH]] or [[LDUH]] over no prophylaxis. ''([[American College of Chest Physicians#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: B]])''<nowiki>"</nowiki>
|-
|-
|bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''3.''' In outpatients with cancer and indwelling central venous catheters, we suggest against routine prophylaxis with LMWH or LDUH ''([[American College of Chest Physicians#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: B]])'' and suggest against the prophylactic use of VKAs ''([[American College of Chest Physicians#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])''. <nowiki>"</nowiki>
|bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''3.''' In outpatients with [[cancer]] and indwelling central venous catheters, we suggest against routine prophylaxis with [[LMWH]] or [[LDUH]] ''([[American College of Chest Physicians#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: B]])'' and suggest against the prophylactic use of VKAs ''([[American College of Chest Physicians#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])''. <nowiki>"</nowiki>
|-
|-
|}
|}

Revision as of 16:07, 13 July 2014



Resident
Survival
Guide

Pulmonary Embolism Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Pulmonary Embolism from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Triggers

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic criteria

Assessment of Clinical Probability and Risk Scores

Pulmonary Embolism Assessment of Probability of Subsequent VTE and Risk Scores

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Arterial Blood Gas Analysis

D-dimer

Biomarkers

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

Ventilation/Perfusion Scan

Echocardiography

Compression Ultrasonography

CT

MRI

Treatment

Treatment approach

Medical Therapy

IVC Filter

Pulmonary Embolectomy

Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy

Discharge Care and Long Term Treatment

Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Follow-Up

Support group

Special Scenario

Pregnancy

Cancer

Trials

Landmark Trials

Case Studies

Case #1

Pulmonary embolism special scenario cancer On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Pulmonary embolism special scenario cancer

CDC on Pulmonary embolism special scenario cancer

Pulmonary embolism special scenario cancer in the news

Blogs on Pulmonary embolism special scenario cancer

Directions to Hospitals Treating Pulmonary embolism special scenario cancer

Risk calculators and risk factors for Pulmonary embolism special scenario cancer

Editor(s)-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1], The APEX Trial Investigators; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rim Halaby, M.D. [2]

Overview

2012 Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (DO NOT EDIT)[1]

Long-term Treatment of Patients With PE (DO NOT EDIT)[1]

Class I
"1. In patients with PE who are treated with VKA, we recommend a therapeutic INR range of 2.0 to 3.0 (target INR of 2.5) over a lower (INR < 2) or higher (INR 3.0-5.0) range for all treatment durations. (Level of Evidence: B)"
"2. In patients with PE and active cancer, if there is a low or moderate bleeding risk, we recommend extended anticoagulant therapy over 3 months of therapy. (Level of Evidence: B)"
Class II
"1. In patients with PE and active cancer, if there is a high bleeding risk, we suggest extended anticoagulant therapy. (Level of Evidence: B)"
"2. In patients with PE and no cancer, we suggest VKA therapy over LMWH for long-term therapy (Level of Evidence: C). For patients with PE and no cancer who are not treated with VKA therapy, we suggest LMWH over dabigatran or rivaroxaban for long-term therapy. (Level of Evidence: C)"
"3. In patients with PE and cancer, we suggest LMWH over VKA therapy (Level of Evidence: B). In patients with PE and cancer who are not treated with LMWH, we suggest VKA over dabigatran or rivaroxaban for long-term therapy (Level of Evidence: C). "

Patients Undergoing General, GI, Urological, Gynecologic, Bariatric, Vascular, Plastic, or Reconstructive Surgery (DO NOT EDIT)[1]

Class I
"1. For high-VTE-risk patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer who are not otherwise at high risk for major bleeding complications, we recommend extended-duration pharmacologic prophylaxis (4 weeks) with LMWH over limited-duration prophylaxis. (Level of Evidence: B)"

Patients With Cancer in the Outpatient Setting (DO NOT EDIT)[1]

Class I
"1. In outpatients with cancer who have no additional risk factors for VTE, we recommend against the prophylactic use of VKAs. (Level of Evidence: B)"
Class II
"1. In outpatients with cancer who have no additional risk factors for VTE, we suggest against routine prophylaxis with LMWH or LDUH. (Level of Evidence: B)"
"2. In outpatients with solid tumors who have additional risk factors for VTE and who are at low risk of bleeding, we suggest prophylactic-dose LMWH or LDUH over no prophylaxis. (Level of Evidence: B)"
"3. In outpatients with cancer and indwelling central venous catheters, we suggest against routine prophylaxis with LMWH or LDUH (Level of Evidence: B) and suggest against the prophylactic use of VKAs (Level of Evidence: C). "

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, Gutterman DD, Schuünemann HJ, American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Panel (2012). "Executive summary: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines". Chest. 141 (2 Suppl): 7S–47S. doi:10.1378/chest.1412S3. PMC 3278060. PMID 22315257.

Template:WH Template:WS