Rocky Mountain spotted fever secondary prevention: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Rocky Mountain spotted fever}} {{CMG}} ==Overview== ==Secondary Prevention== '''Tick Control''' Strategies to reduce populations of vector ticks through area-wide applicat...") |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
Secondary prevention focuses on methods of inhibiting and controlling tick activity in endemic areas. | |||
==Secondary Prevention== | ==Secondary Prevention== | ||
'''Tick Control''' | '''Tick Control''' | ||
* Strategies to reduce populations of vector ticks through area-wide application of acaricides (chemicals that will kill ticks and mites) and control of tick habitats (e.g., leaf litter and brush) have been effective in small-scale trials. | |||
Strategies to reduce populations of vector ticks through area-wide application of acaricides (chemicals that will kill ticks and mites) and control of tick habitats (e.g., leaf litter and brush) have been effective in small-scale trials. New methods being developed include applying acaricides to animal hosts by using baited tubes, boxes, and feeding stations in areas where these pathogens are endemic. Biological control with fungi, parasitic nematodes, and parasitic wasps may play supportive roles in integrated tick control efforts. Community-based, integrated, tick-management strategies may prove to be an effective public health response to reduce the incidence of tick-borne infections. However, limiting exposure to ticks is currently the most effective method of prevention of tick-transmitted diseases. | * New methods being developed include applying acaricides to animal hosts by using baited tubes, boxes, and feeding stations in areas where these pathogens are endemic. Biological control with fungi, parasitic nematodes, and parasitic wasps may play supportive roles in integrated tick control efforts. | ||
* Community-based, integrated, tick-management strategies may prove to be an effective public health response to reduce the incidence of tick-borne infections. | |||
* However, limiting exposure to ticks is currently the most effective method of prevention of tick-transmitted diseases. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|2}} | {{Reflist|2}} | ||
Revision as of 15:51, 5 January 2016
|
Rocky Mountain spotted fever Microchapters |
|
Differentiating Rocky Mountain spotted fever from other Diseases |
|---|
|
Diagnosis |
|
Treatment |
|
Case Studies |
|
Rocky Mountain spotted fever secondary prevention On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Rocky Mountain spotted fever secondary prevention |
|
Rocky Mountain spotted fever secondary prevention in the news |
|
Directions to Hospitals Treating Rocky Mountain spotted fever |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Rocky Mountain spotted fever secondary prevention |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
Secondary prevention focuses on methods of inhibiting and controlling tick activity in endemic areas.
Secondary Prevention
Tick Control
- Strategies to reduce populations of vector ticks through area-wide application of acaricides (chemicals that will kill ticks and mites) and control of tick habitats (e.g., leaf litter and brush) have been effective in small-scale trials.
- New methods being developed include applying acaricides to animal hosts by using baited tubes, boxes, and feeding stations in areas where these pathogens are endemic. Biological control with fungi, parasitic nematodes, and parasitic wasps may play supportive roles in integrated tick control efforts.
- Community-based, integrated, tick-management strategies may prove to be an effective public health response to reduce the incidence of tick-borne infections.
- However, limiting exposure to ticks is currently the most effective method of prevention of tick-transmitted diseases.